CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II vs EOS 1D X Mark III Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II

Canon EOS 1D Mark II
73%

Canon EOS 1D X Mark III

Canon EOS 1D X Mark III
Winner!
75%
Canon EOS 1D X Mark II
vs
Canon EOS 1D X Mark III
Price
Brand
Canon
Canon
Model
EOS 1D X Mark II
EOS 1D X Mark III
Released
Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale.
2016
2020
Announcement Date
Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera.
February 02, 2016
January 07, 2020
Camera Type
DSLR
DSLR
Camera Size
Camera Weight

The Canon EOS 1D X Mark III emerges as the winner with a score of 75/100, a slight lead over the Canon EOS 1D X Mark II, which scored 73/100. Both cameras are DSLRs and share the same dimensions (158 x 168 x 83mm) and launch prices ($6,000 for Mark II and $6,500 for Mark III).

The Mark III has the advantage of being a newer model, released in 2020, which gives it a fresher approach to technology compared to the 2016 release of the Mark II. The winning camera also boasts a significant weight reduction, weighing in at 738g (1.63lbs), making it easier to carry and handle compared to the Mark II’s 1530g (3.37lbs) weight.

However, the Mark II might still appeal to some photographers due to its lower launch price. Despite the difference in scores, both cameras offer great quality and performance, making them suitable for various photography needs. The choice ultimately depends on individual preferences and budget considerations.

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II vs EOS 1D X Mark III Overview and Optics

The Canon EOS 1D X Mark III wins the optics comparison with a score of 74/100, while the Canon EOS 1D X Mark II scores 72/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a full-frame CMOS sensor, Canon EF lens mount, and lack of image stabilization. However, there are differences that set the Mark III apart as the better camera.

The Mark III’s advantages include a faster shooting speed of 20 frames per second (fps) compared to the Mark II’s 16 fps. This enables the Mark III to capture fast-moving subjects more efficiently. Additionally, the Mark III has a superior processor, the Digic X, which contributes to its improved performance. The Mark III also boasts a higher DXOMARK score for its sensor at 91, compared to the Mark II’s score of 88, indicating better overall image quality.

The Mark II has a slightly higher megapixel count of 20.2, compared to the Mark III’s 20.1, but this difference is negligible and does not significantly impact image quality. As such, the Mark II does not hold a clear advantage over the Mark III in any aspect of optics.

Considering these points, the Canon EOS 1D X Mark III is the better camera in terms of optics due to its faster shooting speed, advanced processor, and higher sensor score. The Mark II does not offer any notable advantages over the Mark III. Thus, for photographers seeking superior optical performance, the Canon EOS 1D X Mark III is the clear choice.

Optics
Optics
72%
74%
Megapixels
The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture.
20.2 MP
20.1 MP
Image Resolution
Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution.
5472 x 3648 px
5472 x 3648 px
Sensor Type
The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality.
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture.
24 x 36 mm
24 x 36 mm
Sensor Format
Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes.
Full Frame
Full Frame
Frame Rate
The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode.
16 fps
20 fps
Lens Mount
The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras.
Canon EF
Canon EF
Image Processor
The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card.
Dual Digic 6+
Digic X
Aspect Ratio
The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3.
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image.
100
100
Maximum ISO (Native)
Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise.
51,200
102,400
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary.
50
50
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary.
409600
819200
Minimum Shutter Speed
The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory.
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries.
1/ 8000 s
1/ 8000 s
Autofocus Points
Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings.
61
191
In-body Stabilization
In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake.
Viewfinder Type
The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens.
Optical (pentaprism)
Optical (pentaprism)

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II vs EOS 1D X Mark III Video Performance

The Canon EOS 1D X Mark III outperforms the Canon EOS 1D X Mark II in video capabilities, with a difference of 22 points in their video scores – 91/100 and 69/100, respectively. Both cameras share common specifications, such as 4K maximum video resolution and 4096 x 2160 maximum video dimensions.

The 1D X Mark III surpasses its predecessor in two significant aspects. First, it has a maximum video frame rate of 120fps, doubling the 1D X Mark II’s 60fps. This higher frame rate allows for smoother and more detailed slow-motion footage, making the 1D X Mark III more versatile for various video applications. Second, the 1D X Mark III features built-in time-lapse functionality, which the 1D X Mark II lacks. This addition enables photographers to create stunning time-lapse videos without needing external equipment or software.

On the other hand, the 1D X Mark II does not have any video features that are superior to the 1D X Mark III. Its lower video score reflects this fact, as it lacks the advanced frame rate and time-lapse functionality found in the newer model.

Evaluating both cameras’ video capabilities, it is clear that the Canon EOS 1D X Mark III is the superior choice for photographers and videographers who require high-quality video performance. Its higher video score, doubled frame rate, and built-in time-lapse functionality make it a more capable and versatile camera for capturing professional-grade video content.

Video
Video
69%
91%
Video
Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video.
Max Video Resolution
The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video.
4K
4K
Max Video Dimensions
Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video.
4096 x 2160 px
4096 x 2160 px
Max Video Frame Rate
How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect.
60 p
120 p
Time-Lapse Built In
A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video.
Video File Format
Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files.
MOV, MP4
MPEG-4, MOV

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II vs EOS 1D X Mark III Features and Benefits

The Canon EOS 1D X Mark III wins in the features comparison with a score difference of 22 points. Both cameras have a 3.2-inch touchscreen and GPS functionality but differ in their screen resolution and connectivity options.

The Canon EOS 1D X Mark II and Canon EOS 1D X Mark III share some specifications. Both cameras have a 3.2-inch touchscreen, making it easy for users to navigate through settings and review images. Additionally, they both have GPS functionality, which is useful for geotagging photos and tracking locations.

The Canon EOS 1D X Mark III is the superior camera in terms of features. Its screen resolution is 2,100,000 dots, which is higher than the Mark II’s 1,620,000 dots. This higher resolution provides a clearer and more detailed image on the screen. The Mark III also has Wi-Fi connectivity, which the Mark II lacks. This allows for easier sharing of images and remote control of the camera through a smartphone or tablet.

On the other hand, the Canon EOS 1D X Mark II does not have any features that make it better than the Mark III. It has a lower screen resolution and lacks Wi-Fi connectivity. These factors contribute to the lower feature score of the Canon EOS 1D X Mark II.

As a result, the Canon EOS 1D X Mark III is the clear winner in this comparison. Its higher screen resolution and Wi-Fi connectivity make it a more versatile and user-friendly camera. The Canon EOS 1D X Mark II, while still a powerful camera, falls short in comparison due to its lower screen resolution and lack of Wi-Fi.

Features
Features
74%
74%
Built-in Flash
A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it.
External Flash
External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera.
GPS
GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs.
Weather Sealing
Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions.
Screen Type
LCD
TFT LCD
Touch Screen
Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons.
Screen Size
3.2"
3.2"
Screen Resolution
Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel.
1,620,000 dots
2,100,000 dots
Flip Screen
A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles.
Live View
Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens.
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices.

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II vs EOS 1D X Mark III Storage and Battery

The Canon EOS 1D X Mark III outperforms the Canon EOS 1D X Mark II in storage and battery, scoring 87/100 compared to 79/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as having two memory card slots and using the LP-E19 battery type. Neither camera offers USB charging.

The 1D X Mark III excels with its impressive battery life of 2850 shots, which is more than double the 1D X Mark II’s 1210 shots. Additionally, the Mark III supports the CFexpress Type B memory card, which provides faster read and write speeds compared to the Mark II’s Compact Flash and CFast 2.0 memory cards.

On the other hand, the 1D X Mark II has the advantage of accepting both Compact Flash and CFast 2.0 memory cards, offering more flexibility in storage options. However, this benefit is outweighed by the superior battery life and faster memory card support of the 1D X Mark III.

Ultimately, the Canon EOS 1D X Mark III is the better choice for storage and battery performance, ensuring longer shooting sessions and quicker data transfer.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
79%
87%
Memory Card
Compact Flash, CFast 2.0
CFexpress Type B
Dual Memory Card Slots
Battery Type
LP-E19
LP-E19
Battery Life
Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take.
1,210 shots
2,850 shots
USB Charging
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Overall Score
DXOMARK overall sensor score.
88%
91%
Portrait (Color Depth)
As described by DXOMARK 'The Portrait score in our camera sensor reviews defines color depth performance and its unit is a number of bits. A color depth of 22 bits is excellent; differences below 1 bit are barely noticeable.'
24.1 bits
24.1 bits
Landscape (Dynamic Range)
As described by DXOMARK 'The Landscape score in our camera sensor tests defines the maximum dynamic range of the camera sensor and its unit is an exposure value (EV). A value of 12 EV is excellent with differences below 0.5 EV usually not noticeable.'
13.5 EVs
13.5 EVs
Sports (Low-Light ISO)
Described by DXOMARK as 'The maximal value of ISO sensitivity needed to reach a given value of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The greater the value, the better'
3207
3207
Scores

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II vs EOS 1D X Mark III – Our Verdict

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II vs EOS 1D X Mark III Comparison image.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS 1D X Mark II or the Canon EOS 1D X Mark III:

User Scores
B&H photo video
Spotted a mistake with these camera specs? Please let us know so we can update it!