Side-by-side specs, scores and live prices. Start over
 73
SCORE
|
✓ WINNER
 94
SCORE
|
|
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Brand | Canon | Canon |
| Model | EOS 1D X Mark II | EOS R5 |
Released ⓘRefers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. |
2016 | 2020 |
Announcement date ⓘRefers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. |
02/02/2016 | 30/07/2020 |
| Camera type | DSLR | Mirrorless |
| Camera size | 158 x 168 x 83 mm | 138 x 98 x 88 mm |
| Camera weight | 1530 g | 680 g |
| Optics | ||
Megapixels ⓘThe higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. |
20.2 MP050 | 45 MP050 |
Image resolution ⓘImage resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. |
5472 x 3648 | 8192 x 5464 |
Sensor type ⓘThe camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. |
CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size ⓘThe sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. |
24 x 36 | 23.9 x 35.9 |
Sensor format ⓘRefers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |
Full Frame | Full Frame |
Continuous shooting ⓘThe number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. |
16 fps045 | 20 fps045 |
Lens mount ⓘThe lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. |
Canon EF | Canon RF |
Image processor ⓘThe image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. |
Dual Digic 6+ | Digic X |
Aspect ratio ⓘThe aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |
3:2 | 3:2 |
Min ISO ⓘRefers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. |
10030200 | 10030200 |
Max ISO ⓘRefers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. |
512003003280000 | 512003003280000 |
Min ISO (expanded) ⓘExpanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. |
5030200 | 10030200 |
Max ISO (expanded) ⓘExpanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. |
4096003003280000 | 1024003003280000 |
Minimum shutter speed ⓘThe minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. |
3044080 | 3044080 |
Max shutter speed ⓘThe maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. |
800080032000 | 800080032000 |
Autofocus points ⓘAutofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. |
610300 | 10530300 |
In-body stabilisation ⓘIn-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |
✗ | ✓ |
Viewfinder type ⓘThe viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. |
Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder dots | N/A | 576000009900000 |
| Video | ||
Video ⓘIndicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |
✓ | ✓ |
Max video resolution ⓘThe best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |
4K | 8K |
Max video format ⓘVideo resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. |
4096 x 2160 | 8192 x 4320 |
Max video frame rate ⓘHow many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. |
60 fps | 120 fps |
Timelapse built in ⓘA built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |
✗ | ✓ |
Video file format ⓘDifferent cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. |
MOV, MP4 | MP4 |
| Features | ||
Builtin flash ⓘA built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |
✗ | ✗ |
External flash ⓘExternal flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |
✓ | ✓ |
GPS ⓘGPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |
✓ | ✗ |
Weather sealing ⓘWeather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Screen type | LCD | LCD |
Touch screen ⓘTouchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Screen size | 3.2" | 3.2" |
Screen dots ⓘScreen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. |
16200001150001500000 | 21000001150001500000 |
Flip screen ⓘA flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |
✗ | ✓ |
Live view ⓘLive View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |
✓ | ✓ |
Wi-Fi ⓘBuilt-in Wi-Fi allows you to connect your camera and share images wirelessly. |
✗ | ✓ |
Bluetooth ⓘBluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |
✗ | ✓ |
| Storage & battery | ||
| Memory card | Compact Flash, CFast 2.0 | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible), CFexpress |
| Dual memory card slots | ✓ | ✓ |
| Battery type | LP-E19 | LP-E6NH |
Battery life ⓘApproximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. |
1210 shots1505000 | 320 shots1505000 |
| USB charging | ✗ | ✓ |
The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Canon EOS 1D X Mark II with a score of 86/100 compared to 73/100. Both cameras share some specifications, such as being from the Canon EOS family and having similar dimensions. The R5, however, excels as a mirrorless camera with a lower launch price of $4499 and lighter weight of 680g. The 1D X Mark II, a DSLR, has a higher launch price of $6000 and weighs 1530g.
The R5’s higher score indicates its superior features and performance. The 1D X Mark II, however, still has its merits, especially for those who prefer DSLRs. When considering these cameras, it’s essential to weigh the pros and cons of each based on individual needs and preferences.
The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Canon EOS 1D X Mark II in optics with a score of 88/100 compared to 72/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a CMOS sensor, full-frame sensor size, and a similar processor (Digic X for the R5 and Dual Digic 6+ for the 1D X Mark II).
The EOS R5 excels with its higher megapixel count (45 vs. 20.2), faster shooting speed (20 vs. 16), and better DXOMARK score for the sensor (95 vs. 88). These features contribute to the R5’s superior image quality and performance. Additionally, the R5 has built-in image stabilization, which aids in capturing sharp images, especially in low-light conditions or when using slower shutter speeds.
On the other hand, the 1D X Mark II has its advantages. It features the Canon EF lens mount, which provides compatibility with a wide range of EF lenses. This is particularly useful for photographers who already own Canon EF lenses and do not wish to invest in new RF lenses for the R5. However, it is important to note that the R5’s Canon RF lens mount allows for more advanced lens designs and improved communication between the camera and lens.
In terms of optics, the Canon EOS R5 is the clear winner with its higher score, better performance, and additional features such as image stabilization. The 1D X Mark II, while still a solid choice, falls short in comparison. However, its compatibility with EF lenses may be an appealing factor for some photographers.
The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Canon EOS 1D X Mark II in video capabilities with a score of 100/100 compared to 69/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as 4K video resolution and time-lapse functionality. However, the R5 surpasses the 1D X Mark II in several aspects, making it the better choice for videographers.
The R5 boasts a superior 8K video resolution, doubling the 1D X Mark II’s 4K capability. This results in significantly greater detail and clarity in video footage. Additionally, the R5 offers a higher max video dimension of 8192 x 4320, compared to the 1D X Mark II’s 4096 x 2160. This increased size allows for more flexibility in post-production and higher quality output.
Another advantage the R5 has over the 1D X Mark II is its max video frame rate of 120fps, double that of the 1D X Mark II’s 60fps. This enables the R5 to capture smoother slow-motion footage and provides more versatility in various shooting scenarios. Furthermore, the R5 features built-in time-lapse functionality, which the 1D X Mark II lacks.
While the 1D X Mark II has lower video capabilities, it may still be suitable for those who do not require the advanced features of the R5. However, for those seeking the best video performance, the R5 is the clear winner.
Considering all the points discussed, the Canon EOS R5 is the superior choice for videographers due to its advanced video capabilities, including 8K resolution, higher max video dimensions, and increased frame rate. While the 1D X Mark II may suffice for some users, the R5’s features make it the better camera for those who prioritize video performance.
The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Canon EOS 1D X Mark II in features with a score of 87/100 compared to the latter’s 74/100. Both cameras share a 3.2-inch screen size and touchscreen capabilities. However, the R5 boasts a higher screen resolution of 2,100,000 dots, while the 1D X Mark II has a resolution of 1,620,000 dots.
The R5 has additional features that give it an edge, such as a flip screen, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth capabilities. These features enhance user experience, making it easier to capture images from various angles and share them quickly. On the other hand, the 1D X Mark II lacks these features, which limits its flexibility and connectivity options.
The 1D X Mark II has one advantage over the R5, which is its built-in GPS. This feature allows users to geotag their images, providing valuable information about the location where the photos were taken. The R5 does not have this feature, which may be a drawback for photographers who require geotagging.
In comparing the two cameras, the Canon EOS R5 offers more advanced features, making it the better choice for photographers who prioritize screen resolution, connectivity, and flexibility. The Canon EOS 1D X Mark II, while still a strong contender, falls short in these areas. However, its built-in GPS makes it a suitable option for those who need geotagging capabilities. Each camera has its strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice ultimately depends on the specific needs and preferences of the user.
The Canon EOS 1D X Mark II triumphs over the Canon EOS R5 in storage and battery, scoring 79/100 compared to the R5’s 68/100. Both cameras offer two memory card slots, but the 1D X Mark II accepts Compact Flash and CFast 2.0 cards, while the R5 is compatible with SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II) and CFexpress cards.
The 1D X Mark II outperforms the R5 in battery life, delivering 1210 shots with its LP-E19 battery compared to the R5’s 320 shots using an LP-E6NH battery. However, the R5 holds an advantage in USB charging capabilities, which the 1D X Mark II lacks.
Considering these factors, the Canon EOS 1D X Mark II is superior in terms of storage and battery life, making it a more reliable choice for extended shooting sessions. The Canon EOS R5, while offering more modern storage options and USB charging, falls short in battery performance.
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS 1D X Mark II or the Canon EOS R5:
