Canon EOS 5D Mark III vs EOS R Comparison

The Canon EOS R outperforms the Canon EOS 5D Mark III with a score of 74/100 compared to the latter’s 65/100. Both cameras share some similarities, such as being part of the Canon EOS series and having a full-frame sensor. However, the EOS R, a mirrorless camera, has several advantages. It is lighter, weighing 485g compared to the 5D Mark III’s 950g, and more compact, with dimensions of 136 x 98 x 84mm versus the 5D Mark III’s 152 x 116 x 76mm. Moreover, the EOS R offers a lower launch price of $2300, while the 5D Mark III was initially priced at $3499.

On the other hand, the 5D Mark III, a DSLR camera, has its own benefits. It was released in 2012, providing users with a longer track record and more established reputation. Despite having a higher score, the EOS R does not necessarily make the 5D Mark III obsolete. Both cameras serve different purposes and cater to different preferences. Ultimately, the choice between the Canon EOS R and Canon EOS 5D Mark III depends on the individual photographer’s needs and priorities.

Canon EOS 5D Mark III vs EOS R Overview and Optics

The Canon EOS R emerges as the winner in optics with a score of 73/100, outperforming the Canon EOS 5D Mark III, which scored 67/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, including a CMOS sensor, full-frame sensor size, and an absence of image stabilization.

The EOS R excels with its higher megapixel count of 30.3, compared to the 5D Mark III’s 22.3 megapixels. This increased resolution allows for more detailed and sharper images. Additionally, the EOS R boasts a superior shooting speed of 8 frames per second versus the 5D Mark III’s 6 frames per second, enabling better capture of fast-moving subjects. Furthermore, the EOS R’s Digic 8 processor and higher DXOMARK sensor score of 89 contribute to improved overall image quality and performance.

However, the 5D Mark III has its advantages as well, particularly in terms of lens compatibility. The camera uses the Canon EF lens mount, which supports a vast range of lenses. On the other hand, the EOS R utilizes the newer Canon RF mount, which has a more limited lens selection at present.

In terms of optics, the Canon EOS R outperforms the 5D Mark III with its higher resolution, faster shooting speed, and better overall image quality. Nevertheless, the 5D Mark III may still appeal to those who prioritize lens compatibility and the availability of a wider selection of lenses.

The Canon EOS R outperforms the Canon EOS 5D Mark III in terms of video capabilities, scoring 70 out of 100 compared to the 5D Mark III’s score of 56. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as the ability to record video at high frame rates. However, the EOS R has several advantages over the 5D Mark III, which contribute to its higher score.

One of the key differences between the two cameras is their maximum video resolutions. The EOS R can record 4K video with dimensions of 3840 x 2160, while the 5D Mark III is limited to Full HD with dimensions of 1920 x 1080. This means that the EOS R can capture more detail in its videos, making it a better choice for those who prioritize video quality. Additionally, the EOS R has built-in time-lapse functionality, which allows users to create stunning time-lapse videos without the need for additional equipment or software.

Despite these advantages, the 5D Mark III does have one edge over the EOS R: its maximum video frame rate. The 5D Mark III can record video at up to 60fps, while the EOS R is limited to 30fps. This higher frame rate allows for smoother video playback and can be beneficial for certain applications, such as sports or action photography.

Taking all of these factors into consideration, the Canon EOS R is the clear winner in terms of video capabilities. Its higher resolution and built-in time-lapse functionality make it a more versatile option for videographers. However, the 5D Mark III’s higher frame rate may still be appealing to some users, depending on their specific needs.

The Canon EOS R outperforms the Canon EOS 5D Mark III in terms of features, scoring 87 out of 100, compared to the 5D Mark III’s 59. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as a 3.2-inch screen size and the lack of GPS. However, the EOS R surpasses the 5D Mark III in several aspects that contribute to its higher score.

The EOS R boasts a significantly higher screen resolution of 2,100,000 dots, compared to the 5D Mark III’s 1,040,000 dots. This results in a sharper and clearer display, which is essential for reviewing photos and navigating menus. Additionally, the EOS R features a touchscreen, making it more intuitive and user-friendly. The flip screen on the EOS R allows for greater flexibility when composing shots, especially in challenging angles or for vlogging purposes.

Connectivity is another area where the EOS R outshines the 5D Mark III. The EOS R is equipped with both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth capabilities, allowing for seamless photo transfers and remote camera control via compatible devices. The 5D Mark III lacks these features, which may limit its usability for some users.

Despite the lower score, the 5D Mark III remains a reliable camera for specific purposes. It may be preferred by those who prioritize a simpler interface without touchscreen functionality, or those who do not require advanced connectivity options.

By examining the features of both cameras, it is clear that the Canon EOS R offers a more advanced and versatile experience for users. The EOS R’s higher screen resolution, touchscreen, flip screen, and connectivity options contribute to its superior score, making it a better choice for photographers seeking these features. The 5D Mark III, while lacking in these areas, may still suit the needs of users who prefer simplicity over advanced functionality.

The Canon EOS 5D Mark III outperforms the Canon EOS R in storage and battery with a score of 76/100 compared to the latter’s 35/100. Both cameras share similarities, such as accepting SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards. However, the 5D Mark III has two memory card slots, while the EOS R has only one, which is UHS-II compatible.

The 5D Mark III also boasts a longer battery life, providing 950 shots per charge with its LP-E6 battery type. In contrast, the EOS R offers 370 shots using an LP-E6N battery. Despite this advantage, the EOS R does have USB charging capabilities, which the 5D Mark III lacks.

Considering these factors, the Canon EOS 5D Mark III is superior in storage and battery life, offering more memory card slots and longer shooting time. However, the Canon EOS R provides the convenience of USB charging, which may appeal to some users.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS 5D Mark III or the Canon EOS R:

• Canon EOS R vs EOS R6
• Canon EOS R vs EOS R10
• Canon EOS R vs EOS R7
• Canon EOS R vs Nikon Z5
• Canon EOS 5D Mark III vs EOS 6D Mark II
• Canon EOS 5D Mark III vs EOS 5D Mark IV