Side-by-side specs, scores and live prices. Start over
|
✓ WINNER
 75
SCORE
|
 70
SCORE
|
|
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Brand | Canon | Sony |
| Model | EOS 5D Mark IV | a7R II |
Released ⓘRefers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. |
2016 | 2015 |
Announcement date ⓘRefers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. |
25/08/2016 | 10/06/2015 |
| Camera type | DSLR | Mirrorless |
| Camera size | 151 x 116 x 76 mm | 127 x 96 x 60 mm |
| Camera weight | 890 g | 625 g |
| Optics | ||
Megapixels ⓘThe higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. |
30.4 MP050 | 42.4 MP050 |
Image resolution ⓘImage resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. |
6720 x 4480 | 7952 x 5304 |
Sensor type ⓘThe camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. |
CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size ⓘThe sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. |
24 x 36 | 24 x 35.9 |
Sensor format ⓘRefers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |
Full Frame | Full Frame |
Continuous shooting ⓘThe number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. |
7 fps045 | 5 fps045 |
Lens mount ⓘThe lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. |
Canon EF | Sony FE |
Image processor ⓘThe image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. |
Digic 6+ | Bionz X |
Aspect ratio ⓘThe aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |
3:2 | 3:2 |
Min ISO ⓘRefers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. |
10030200 | 10030200 |
Max ISO ⓘRefers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. |
320003003280000 | 256003003280000 |
Min ISO (expanded) ⓘExpanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. |
5030200 | 5030200 |
Max ISO (expanded) ⓘExpanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. |
1024003003280000 | 1024003003280000 |
Minimum shutter speed ⓘThe minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. |
3044080 | 3044080 |
Max shutter speed ⓘThe maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. |
800080032000 | 800080032000 |
Autofocus points ⓘAutofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. |
610300 | 3990300 |
In-body stabilisation ⓘIn-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |
✗ | ✓ |
Viewfinder type ⓘThe viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. |
Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder dots | N/A | 235929609900000 |
| Video | ||
Video ⓘIndicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |
✓ | ✓ |
Max video resolution ⓘThe best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |
4K | 4K |
Max video format ⓘVideo resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. |
4096 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
Max video frame rate ⓘHow many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. |
120 fps | 30 fps |
Timelapse built in ⓘA built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |
✓ | ✗ |
Video file format ⓘDifferent cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. |
MOV, MP4 | XAVCS, AVCHD, MP4 |
| Features | ||
Builtin flash ⓘA built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |
✗ | ✗ |
External flash ⓘExternal flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |
✓ | ✓ |
GPS ⓘGPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |
✓ | ✗ |
Weather sealing ⓘWeather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Screen type | TFT LCD | LCD |
Touch screen ⓘTouchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |
✓ | ✗ |
| Screen size | 3.2" | 3" |
Screen dots ⓘScreen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. |
16200001150001500000 | 12288001150001500000 |
Flip screen ⓘA flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |
✗ | ✓ |
Live view ⓘLive View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |
✓ | ✓ |
Wi-Fi ⓘBuilt-in Wi-Fi allows you to connect your camera and share images wirelessly. |
✓ | ✓ |
Bluetooth ⓘBluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |
✗ | ✗ |
| Storage & battery | ||
| Memory card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible), Compact Flash | SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro-HG Duo |
| Dual memory card slots | ✓ | ✗ |
| Battery type | LP-E6N | NP-FW50 |
Battery life ⓘApproximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. |
900 shots1505000 | 290 shots1505000 |
| USB charging | ✗ | ✗ |
The Canon EOS 5D Mark IV outperforms the Sony a7R II with a score of 75/100 compared to 70/100. Both cameras were released in the mid-2010s, with the Canon 5D Mark IV launching in 2016 at $3500 and the Sony a7R II in 2015 at $3198. They share some common specifications, such as their full-frame sensors.
The Canon 5D Mark IV has the advantage of being a DSLR, which typically provides better battery life and faster autofocus performance. Additionally, it is slightly larger and heavier at 151 x 116 x 76mm and 890g, which may offer a more stable shooting experience for some users.
On the other hand, the Sony a7R II is a mirrorless camera, which makes it lighter and more compact at 127 x 96 x 60mm and 625g. This can be beneficial for photographers who prioritize portability and a smaller form factor.
Considering these factors, the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV proves to be a more versatile and reliable camera for various shooting scenarios, while the Sony a7R II offers a more compact and lightweight option for those who value portability.
The Sony a7R II outperforms the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV in optics, scoring 81/100 compared to the Canon’s 76/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as a full-frame CMOS sensor, which provides excellent image quality and low-light performance. They also share compatibility with their respective native lens mounts – Canon EF for the 5D Mark IV and Sony FE for the a7R II.
The Sony a7R II excels with its 42.4-megapixel resolution, allowing for more detailed images than the Canon’s 30.4 megapixels. Furthermore, the a7R II has a higher DXOMARK sensor score of 98, compared to the 5D Mark IV’s 91, indicating superior image quality. The a7R II also features in-body image stabilization, which helps to reduce camera shake and improve handheld shooting.
On the other hand, the Canon 5D Mark IV has a faster shooting speed of 7 frames per second (fps) compared to the Sony’s 5 fps. This makes it better suited for action and sports photography. Its Digic 6+ processor also ensures fast performance and efficient handling of large image files.
Weighing the strengths and weaknesses of both cameras, the Sony a7R II stands out in optics with its higher resolution, better sensor performance, and image stabilization. However, the Canon 5D Mark IV offers advantages in shooting speed and processing power. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras should be based on the specific needs and priorities of the photographer.
The Canon EOS 5D Mark IV outperforms the Sony a7R II in video capabilities, scoring 91/100 compared to the Sony’s 56/100. Both cameras share common features, such as 4K video resolution. However, the Canon 5D Mark IV surpasses the Sony a7R II in several key aspects, leading to its higher score.
Firstly, the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV has a higher maximum video dimension of 4096 x 2160, while the Sony a7R II’s maximum is 3840 x 2160. This difference allows the Canon to produce larger, more detailed videos. Additionally, the Canon boasts a maximum video frame rate of 120fps, compared to the Sony’s 30fps. The higher frame rate enables the Canon to capture smoother, more professional-looking videos, particularly during fast-paced action or sports scenes.
Another advantage of the Canon 5D Mark IV is its built-in time-lapse functionality, which the Sony a7R II lacks. This feature allows users to create stunning time-lapse videos without the need for additional equipment or software.
Despite these advantages, the Sony a7R II still has some merits. For instance, its lower score does not necessarily mean it is a poor camera for video capture. In fact, it offers 4K video resolution and may be sufficient for casual users or those with less demanding video requirements.
To sum up, the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV clearly excels in video capabilities, making it a superior choice for videographers and professionals who require advanced features. On the other hand, the Sony a7R II, while not as impressive in this area, may still be suitable for users with less demanding video needs.
The Canon EOS 5D Mark IV is the winner in the features comparison, with a score of 74/100, while the Sony a7R II scores 57/100. Both cameras share some specifications, such as a WIFI connection and the absence of Bluetooth. However, the Canon camera excels in certain areas, making it the better choice in terms of features.
The Canon EOS 5D Mark IV has a larger screen size of 3.2 inches compared to the Sony a7R II’s 3 inches. The Canon also has a higher screen resolution of 1,620,000 dots, compared to the Sony’s 1,228,800 dots. Furthermore, the Canon camera has a touchscreen, while the Sony does not. The presence of GPS in the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV is an advantage over the Sony a7R II, which lacks this feature.
On the other hand, the Sony a7R II has a flip screen, which the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV does not possess. This feature can be useful for photographers who need to take pictures from different angles. However, this advantage is not enough to outweigh the benefits of the Canon camera.
In this comparison, the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV is the better camera in terms of features. Its larger screen size, higher screen resolution, touchscreen, and GPS make it a more versatile and user-friendly option than the Sony a7R II. While the Sony camera has the advantage of a flip screen, it falls short in other areas, resulting in a lower overall score.
The Canon EOS 5D Mark IV outperforms the Sony a7R II in storage and battery, scoring 71/100 to Sony’s 16/100. Both cameras accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards, with the Canon 5D Mark IV also supporting Compact Flash and the Sony a7R II accommodating Memory Stick Duo, Pro Duo, and Pro-HG Duo cards. The 5D Mark IV offers two memory card slots, while the a7R II has only one.
A significant advantage of the Canon 5D Mark IV is its battery life, providing 900 shots per charge compared to the Sony a7R II’s 290 shots. The 5D Mark IV uses an LP-E6N battery, while the a7R II relies on an NP-FW50 battery. Neither camera offers USB charging.
In storage and battery performance, the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV clearly surpasses the Sony a7R II with its longer battery life and additional memory card slot. Despite the a7R II’s compatibility with Memory Stick cards, it falls short in overall storage and battery capabilities.
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV or the Sony a7R II:
