Canon EOS 6D Mark II vs EOS R6 Mark II Comparison

The Canon EOS R6 Mark II takes the lead with a score of 78/100, while the Canon EOS 6D Mark II trails behind with a score of 71/100. Both cameras share similarities, such as being released by Canon and having high-quality optics. However, there are notable differences that set the winning camera apart.

The Canon EOS R6 Mark II is a mirrorless camera, which contributes to its better performance. Launched in 2022 with a price of $2499, it features a compact size of 138.4 x 98.4 x 88.4mm and weighs 588g, making it slightly heavier than its competitor.

On the other hand, the Canon EOS 6D Mark II is a DSLR camera released in 2017 with a launch price of $2000. It has a larger size of 144 x 111 x 75mm and weighs less at 453g. Despite its lower score, the 6D Mark II still offers excellent performance and is more affordable.

Considering the specifications, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II stands out as the better camera due to its higher score and mirrorless technology. However, the Canon EOS 6D Mark II remains a solid choice for those seeking a more budget-friendly option with a lighter weight.

Canon EOS 6D Mark II vs EOS R6 Mark II Overview and Optics

The Canon EOS R6 Mark II emerges as the winner in optics, scoring 83/100, while the Canon EOS 6D Mark II scores 69/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as having a CMOS sensor, full-frame sensor size, and a similar megapixel count with the 6D Mark II having 26.2 and the R6 Mark II at 24.

The R6 Mark II outshines the 6D Mark II in several aspects. Firstly, it has a significantly faster shooting speed of 40, compared to the 6D Mark II’s 6.5. This enables the R6 Mark II to capture fast-moving subjects more effectively. Additionally, the R6 Mark II has a higher DXOMARK score for its sensor at 91, while the 6D Mark II scores 85, indicating better overall image quality. Furthermore, the R6 Mark II features a more advanced Digic X processor, contributing to improved processing speed and performance. Lastly, the R6 Mark II offers built-in image stabilization, while the 6D Mark II lacks this feature.

On the other hand, the 6D Mark II has a slightly higher megapixel count at 26.2, compared to the R6 Mark II’s 24, which may offer marginally better resolution. However, this minor advantage does not outweigh the numerous benefits provided by the R6 Mark II.

Comparing the two cameras, it becomes evident that the Canon EOS R6 Mark II surpasses the Canon EOS 6D Mark II in terms of optics. The faster shooting speed, higher DXOMARK score, advanced processor, and image stabilization make the R6 Mark II a more suitable choice for photographers seeking superior optical performance. While the 6D Mark II may have a marginally higher resolution, it does not compensate for the other advantages offered by the R6 Mark II.

The Canon EOS R6 Mark II outperforms the Canon EOS 6D Mark II in video capabilities, with a score of 83 out of 100 compared to the 6D Mark II’s 57 out of 100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as having time-lapse functionality built in.

The EOS R6 Mark II excels in video resolution and frame rate. It offers 4K video resolution with dimensions of 3840 x 2160, which is a significant improvement over the 6D Mark II’s Full HD video resolution of 1920 x 1080. Additionally, the R6 Mark II provides a maximum video frame rate of 60fps, double the 6D Mark II’s 30fps. This allows for smoother video playback and more detailed footage, making the R6 Mark II a superior choice for videography.

On the other hand, the EOS 6D Mark II does not have any video capabilities that surpass the R6 Mark II. Its lower video resolution and frame rate make it less suitable for professional video work. However, it may still be adequate for casual users or those who prioritize photography over videography.

To conclude, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II is the clear winner when it comes to video capabilities. Its 4K resolution and 60fps frame rate provide a notable advantage over the 6D Mark II, making it the better choice for videographers or those who require high-quality video. The 6D Mark II, while not as impressive in this area, may still be suitable for those who primarily focus on photography or have less demanding video needs.

The Canon EOS 6D Mark II emerges as the winner in the features comparison, scoring 83/100, while the Canon EOS R6 Mark II scores 72/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, touchscreen functionality, flip screen, GPS, WiFi, and Bluetooth capabilities.

The 6D Mark II outshines the R6 Mark II in several aspects. The screen resolution of the 6D Mark II is 1,040,000 dots, which provides a clear and sharp display for reviewing images and navigating the menu. The higher feature score of the 6D Mark II also suggests that it offers more advanced options and customizability for photographers, allowing them to capture images with greater precision and control.

On the other hand, the R6 Mark II does have a higher screen resolution at 1,620,000 dots, which can offer a more detailed and vibrant display. However, this advantage does not outweigh the overall higher feature score of the 6D Mark II. The lower score of the R6 Mark II indicates that it may lack some advanced features found in the 6D Mark II, making it a less versatile option for photographers.

In comparing the features of the Canon EOS 6D Mark II and the Canon EOS R6 Mark II, it is evident that the 6D Mark II has a significant edge over its counterpart. With a higher feature score and a clear display, the 6D Mark II offers photographers more options and control in capturing their desired shots. While the R6 Mark II does have a higher screen resolution, it falls short in other aspects, making the 6D Mark II the superior choice for those seeking a feature-rich camera.

The Canon EOS R6 Mark II outperforms the Canon EOS 6D Mark II in storage and battery, scoring 68/100 compared to the 6D Mark II’s 45/100. Both cameras accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards, but the R6 Mark II has two memory card slots and is UHS-II compatible, while the 6D Mark II only has one slot and is UHS-I compatible. This gives the R6 Mark II an advantage in storage capacity and speed.

In terms of battery life, the 6D Mark II fares better with 1200 shots per charge using its LP-E6N battery. The R6 Mark II, on the other hand, offers 360 shots per charge with its LP-E6NH battery. However, the R6 Mark II compensates for this by offering USB charging, a feature absent in the 6D Mark II.

Taking these factors into account, the R6 Mark II is superior in storage capabilities, while the 6D Mark II has a longer battery life. The addition of USB charging in the R6 Mark II may offset its shorter battery life for some users, making it the better choice for those prioritizing storage and charging convenience.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS 6D Mark II or the Canon EOS R6 Mark II:

• Canon EOS R5 vs EOS R6 Mark II
• Canon EOS 90D vs EOS 6D Mark II
• Canon EOS R6 vs EOS R6 Mark II
• Canon EOS 5D Mark IV vs EOS 6D Mark II
• Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs EOS R8
• Canon EOS 5D Mark III vs EOS 6D Mark II