Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Canon EOS 6D Mark II vs EOS R6 Comparison

Storage & Battery

Canon EOS 6D Mark II

canon eos 6d mark ii

Canon EOS R6

canon eos r6
Canon EOS 6D Mark II
Canon EOS R6
EOS 6D Mark II
Announcement Date
June 29, 2017
August 27, 2020
Camera Type
Camera Size
Camera Weight

The Canon EOS R6 is the winner in this comparison, scoring 80/100 compared to the Canon EOS 6D Mark II‘s score of 71/100. Both cameras share specifications like their announcement and release years (2017 and 2020), launch prices ($2000 and $2499), and camera sizes (144 x 111 x 75mm and 138 x 98 x 88mm). The EOS R6 is better due to its mirrorless design, resulting in a higher score. The EOS 6D Mark II, however, is lighter at 453g compared to the R6’s 680g, making it more portable. Despite the weight advantage, the EOS R6’s superior performance and features make it the better choice for photographers.

Canon EOS 6D Mark II vs EOS R6 Overview and Optics

The Canon EOS R6 wins the optics comparison with a score of 79/100, while the Canon EOS 6D Mark II scores 69/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, including a full-frame CMOS sensor and a shooting speed of 6.5 frames per second. However, the EOS R6 outperforms the 6D Mark II in several aspects.

The EOS R6 has a higher DXOMARK score for its sensor at 90, compared to the 6D Mark II’s score of 85. This means the R6 has a better sensor performance, contributing to higher image quality. The R6 also features a faster shooting speed of 20 frames per second, allowing for better action and sports photography. Additionally, the R6 has a more advanced processor, the Digic X, which enables faster image processing and better noise reduction. The lens mount on the R6 is Canon RF, which allows users to utilize the new RF lenses that offer better optical performance and faster autofocus. Furthermore, the R6 offers image stabilization, providing sharper images in low light situations or with longer focal lengths.

On the other hand, the 6D Mark II has a higher megapixel count at 26.2, compared to the R6’s 20.1. This results in larger image files and more detailed images for large prints or heavy cropping. The 6D Mark II also features the Canon EF lens mount, which is compatible with a vast range of Canon lenses.

In the optics comparison, the Canon EOS R6 is the clear winner due to its better sensor performance, faster shooting speed, advanced processor, and image stabilization. However, the Canon EOS 6D Mark II still holds value with its higher megapixel count and compatibility with the extensive EF lens lineup.

26.2 MP
20.1 MP
Image Resolution
6240 x 4160 px
5472 x 3648 px
Sensor Type
Sensor Size
24 x 35.9 mm
23.9 x 35.9 mm
Sensor Format
Full Frame
Full Frame
Frame Rate
6.5 fps
20 fps
Lens Mount
Canon EF
Canon RF
Image Processor
Digic 7
Digic X
Aspect Ratio
Minimum ISO (Native)
Maximum ISO (Native)
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 4000 s
1/ 8000 s
Autofocus Points
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder Resolution
3,690,000 dots

Canon EOS 6D Mark II vs EOS R6 Video Performance

The Canon EOS R6 surpasses the Canon EOS 6D Mark II in video capabilities with a significant 34-point difference in their video scores, 91/100 and 57/100 respectively. Both cameras share some common video features, such as built-in time-lapse functionality. However, the R6 stands out as a superior video camera in several aspects.

One major advantage of the EOS R6 is its maximum video resolution. The R6 can record in 4K, offering video dimensions of 3840 x 2160, while the 6D Mark II is limited to Full HD with dimensions of 1920 x 1080. This means that the R6 can capture videos with a higher level of detail and clarity compared to the 6D Mark II.

Additionally, the EOS R6 boasts a higher maximum video frame rate, reaching up to 120fps, allowing for smoother video playback and better slow-motion capabilities. In contrast, the 6D Mark II’s maximum frame rate is 30fps, which may not be sufficient for capturing fast-paced action or creating smooth slow-motion footage.

While the 6D Mark II falls short in comparison to the R6, it still offers decent video performance for those who do not require 4K resolution or high frame rates. Its Full HD resolution and 30fps frame rate are suitable for casual video recording and content creation.

Considering the differences in video capabilities, the Canon EOS R6 is the clear winner in this comparison. Its 4K resolution and 120fps frame rate make it a more powerful and versatile video camera. The 6D Mark II, while not as advanced, remains a reliable option for those with less demanding video needs.

Max Video Resolution
Full HD
Max Video Dimensions
1920 x 1080 px
3840 x 2160 px
Max Video Frame Rate
60 p
120 p
Time-Lapse Built In
Video File Format

Canon EOS 6D Mark II vs EOS R6 Features and Benefits

The Canon EOS R6 emerges as the winner in this comparison, with a feature score of 85/100 as opposed to the Canon EOS 6D Mark II’s score of 83/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, including a 3-inch touchscreen, flip screen, WIFI, and Bluetooth capabilities.

The Canon EOS R6 outperforms the 6D Mark II in screen resolution, boasting 1,620,000 dots compared to the 6D Mark II’s 1,040,000 dots. This higher resolution provides the R6 with sharper and more detailed image previews and menu navigation, enhancing the overall user experience.

On the other hand, the Canon EOS 6D Mark II possesses a GPS feature, which the R6 lacks. This allows the 6D Mark II to geotag images, making it easier for photographers to keep track of shooting locations. This advantage may appeal to landscape and travel photographers who value this added functionality.

Taking into account the differences in feature scores and specifications, the Canon EOS R6 stands out as a superior camera due to its higher screen resolution. However, the Canon EOS 6D Mark II offers the unique advantage of GPS functionality, which could be a deciding factor for certain photographers. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras will depend on the individual’s preferences and priorities in terms of features and functionality.

Built-in Flash
External Flash
Weather Sealing
Screen Type
Touch Screen
Screen Size
Screen Resolution
1,040,000 dots
1,620,000 dots
Flip Screen
Live View

Canon EOS 6D Mark II vs EOS R6 Storage and Battery

The Canon EOS R6 outperforms the Canon EOS 6D Mark II in storage and battery, scoring 68/100 compared to the 6D Mark II’s 45/100. Both cameras accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards, but the R6 has two memory card slots and supports faster UHS-II cards, while the 6D Mark II has only one slot and is limited to UHS-I cards. This gives the R6 an advantage in storage capacity and speed.

The 6D Mark II has a longer battery life, offering 1200 shots per charge compared to the R6’s 360 shots. However, the R6 uses the newer LP-E6NH battery type and features USB charging, which provides more flexibility and convenience for on-the-go photographers.

Despite the 6D Mark II’s superior battery life, the Canon EOS R6’s dual memory card slots, faster card support, and USB charging capabilities make it the better choice in terms of storage and battery.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible)
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible)
Dual Memory Card Slots
Battery Type
Battery Life
1,200 shots
360 shots
USB Charging
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Overall Score
Portrait (Color Depth)
24.4 bits
24.2 bits
Landscape (Dynamic Range)
11.9 EVs
14.3 EVs
Sports (Low-Light ISO)

Canon EOS 6D Mark II vs EOS R6 – Our Verdict

Canon EOS 6D Mark II vs EOS R6 Comparison image.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS 6D Mark II or the Canon EOS R6:

User Scores
Spotted a mistake with these specs? Please let us know so we can update it!