Canon EOS 6D Mark II vs Nikon D3300 Comparison

The Canon EOS 6D Mark II outperforms the Nikon D3300 with a score of 71/100 compared to 55/100. Both cameras are DSLR models, released in 2017 and 2014 respectively, with the Canon being more expensive at $2000 while the Nikon costs $650. They share similar dimensions and weight, with the Canon measuring 144 x 111 x 75mm and weighing 453g, and the Nikon at 124 x 98 x 76mm and 430g.

The Canon EOS 6D Mark II’s higher score reflects its superior features, making it a better camera. On the other hand, the Nikon D3300 may appeal to those on a tighter budget, as it is significantly cheaper. However, the price difference comes with a compromise in performance and features. Therefore, the Canon EOS 6D Mark II is the better choice for those seeking a more advanced camera, while the Nikon D3300 is suitable for beginners or those with budget constraints.

Canon EOS 6D Mark II vs Nikon D3300 Overview and Optics

The Canon EOS 6D Mark II outperforms the Nikon D3300 in optics with a score of 69/100 compared to 64/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as a CMOS sensor type, absence of image stabilization, and similar megapixel counts (26.2 for Canon and 24.2 for Nikon).

The Canon EOS 6D Mark II excels in several areas. It has a higher shooting speed of 6.5 compared to the Nikon D3300’s 5, allowing for faster continuous shooting. Additionally, the Canon model features a Digic 7 processor, which contributes to better image processing and overall performance. The EOS 6D Mark II also boasts a full-frame sensor size, resulting in higher image quality and better low-light performance. Its DXOMARK sensor score of 85 surpasses the Nikon D3300’s 82. Moreover, the Canon camera uses the Canon EF lens mount, providing access to a vast range of high-quality lenses.

On the other hand, the Nikon D3300 has some advantages. Its APS-C sensor size makes the camera body smaller and lighter, which is beneficial for travel and portability. The Nikon F DX lens mount also offers a variety of lens options, although not as extensive as the Canon EF mount.

Considering the optics, the Canon EOS 6D Mark II stands out as the better camera with its higher score, faster shooting speed, superior processor, full-frame sensor, and broader lens compatibility. However, the Nikon D3300 may be more suitable for those prioritizing a compact and lightweight camera with adequate optics performance.

The Canon EOS 6D Mark II narrowly outperforms the Nikon D3300 in video capabilities, with a score of 57/100 to the D3300’s 56/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as Full HD maximum video resolution and 1920 x 1080 maximum video dimensions.

The 6D Mark II has an advantage over the D3300 in its built-in time-lapse functionality. This feature allows users to create stunning time-lapse videos without the need for additional equipment or software, providing more creative options and convenience.

On the other hand, the Nikon D3300 surpasses the 6D Mark II in terms of maximum video frame rate, offering 60fps compared to the 6D Mark II’s 30fps. This higher frame rate is beneficial for capturing fast-moving subjects or creating slow-motion effects, providing smoother and more fluid video playback.

To sum up, the Canon EOS 6D Mark II is slightly better in video capabilities due to its built-in time-lapse functionality, which adds a creative edge and convenience for users. However, the Nikon D3300 holds its own with a higher maximum video frame rate, making it suitable for capturing fast action or creating slow-motion effects. Both cameras offer Full HD resolution and share the same maximum video dimensions, making them solid choices for video enthusiasts.

The Canon EOS 6D Mark II outperforms the Nikon D3300 with a feature score of 83/100 compared to 41/100. Both cameras have a 3-inch screen, but the Canon 6D Mark II has a higher screen resolution of 1,040,000 dots, while the Nikon D3300 has 921,000 dots. This means the Canon 6D Mark II provides a clearer display for reviewing images and menu navigation.

The Canon 6D Mark II offers a touchscreen, which the Nikon D3300 lacks. This feature makes it easier to navigate menus, change settings, and select focus points. Additionally, the Canon 6D Mark II has a flip screen, allowing for more versatile shooting angles and easier self-portraits. The Nikon D3300 does not have this feature.

In terms of connectivity, the Canon 6D Mark II has GPS, WIFI, and Bluetooth capabilities, while the Nikon D3300 does not offer any of these features. This means the Canon 6D Mark II allows for easier sharing of images, remote control of the camera, and geotagging of photos.

Despite the lower feature score, the Nikon D3300 is still a capable camera, especially for beginners or those on a budget. It shares the same screen size as the Canon 6D Mark II and has a decent screen resolution. However, it lacks the advanced features and connectivity options found in the Canon 6D Mark II.

After evaluating the features of both cameras, it is clear that the Canon EOS 6D Mark II offers more advanced options and better connectivity, making it the superior choice. The Nikon D3300 is a suitable option for those seeking a more affordable and beginner-friendly camera, but it does not compare to the Canon 6D Mark II in terms of features.

The Canon EOS 6D Mark II outperforms the Nikon D3300 in storage and battery with a score of 45/100, compared to the Nikon’s 32/100. Both cameras have a single memory card slot and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards. Neither camera offers USB charging.

The Canon EOS 6D Mark II excels with its battery life, providing 1200 shots per charge using the LP-E6N battery. In contrast, the Nikon D3300’s battery life falls short at 700 shots per charge with the EN-EL14a battery. This makes the Canon EOS 6D Mark II more suitable for extended shooting sessions without frequent battery changes.

However, the Nikon D3300 is not without its advantages. It accepts a wider range of memory cards, including non-UHS-I SDXC cards. This flexibility allows users to utilize various cards they may already own, potentially saving on additional costs.

Ultimately, the Canon EOS 6D Mark II’s superior battery life makes it the better choice for photographers who require more shots per charge. The Nikon D3300’s broader memory card compatibility may appeal to some users, but its shorter battery life limits its practicality in comparison.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS 6D Mark II or the Nikon D3300:

• Canon EOS 90D vs EOS 6D Mark II
• Canon EOS 5D Mark IV vs EOS 6D Mark II
• Canon EOS 5D Mark III vs EOS 6D Mark II
• Canon EOS 6D vs EOS 6D Mark II
• Canon EOS 6D Mark II vs EOS R6 Mark II
• Canon EOS 6D Mark II vs EOS Rebel T8i / 850D