Canon EOS M200 vs EOS M50 Comparison

The Canon EOS M200 and the Canon EOS M50 are both mirrorless cameras with a close overall score. Released in 2019 and 2018 respectively, they share similar features.

Both cameras perform well, but the EOS M200 stands out due to its compact size, measuring 108 x 67 x 35mm and weighing only 229g (0.50lbs). This makes it more portable and convenient for users.

The EOS M50 is slightly larger and heavier, measuring 116 x 88 x 59mm and weighing 390g (0.86lbs). This might be better for those who prefer a more substantial grip on their camera.

Taking these factors into account, the Canon EOS M200 is a better choice for users seeking affordability and portability, while the Canon EOS M50 may suit those who prefer a larger and more robust feel.

Canon M200 vs M50 Overview and Optics

The Canon EOS M200 wins the optics comparison with a score of 62/100, a few points ahead of the Canon EOS M50. Both cameras share several specifications, including 24 megapixels, a CMOS sensor, Digic 8 processor, an APS-C sensor size, a Canon EF-M lens mount, and no image stabilization.

The Canon EOS M50 outperforms the M200 in terms of shooting speed, offering a faster rate of 10 frames per second compared to the M200’s 6.1. This advantage allows the M50 to capture fast-moving subjects and action scenes more effectively. The M50’s slightly higher optics score reflects this improved performance.

The Canon EOS M50 outperforms the Canon EOS M200 in video capabilities with a score of 91/100 compared to the M200’s 83/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as a maximum video resolution of 4K and video dimensions of 3840 x 2160. Both cameras have time-lapse functionality built in.

The Canon EOS M50 takes the lead with its higher maximum video frame rate of 120fps, which is double the M200’s 60fps. This allows the M50 to capture smoother slow-motion footage and provides more flexibility in post-production. The faster frame rate makes the M50 a superior choice for those who prioritize video performance and need the ability to record high-quality, slow-motion footage.

While the Canon EOS M200 falls short in terms of video frame rate, it still offers solid video capabilities. Its 4K resolution and time-lapse functionality make it a suitable choice for casual video shooters who do not require the advanced slow-motion features of the M50. The M200 remains a viable option for those who value a balance between video performance and affordability.

Comparing the video capabilities of the Canon EOS M50 and the Canon EOS M200, the M50 is the clear winner due to its higher video frame rate. This advantage makes it the better choice for users who need advanced video features, such as slow-motion recording. The M200 still offers a decent video performance for casual users who do not require the additional capabilities provided by the M50.

The Canon EOS M200 and the Canon EOS M50 both have a feature score of 70/100, making them equal in terms of features. Both cameras share many specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, a screen resolution of 1,040,000 dots, a touchscreen, a flip screen, and connectivity options like GPS, WIFI, and Bluetooth.

The Canon EOS M200 excels in its compact size and lightweight design, making it a more portable option for photographers on the go. Additionally, it has a user-friendly interface, making it ideal for beginners who are just starting in photography.

On the other hand, the Canon EOS M50 offers more advanced features that may appeal to more experienced photographers. It has a better autofocus system, providing faster and more accurate focus for both stills and video. Furthermore, the M50 has a viewfinder, which can be helpful for composing shots in bright sunlight or when using longer lenses.

When comparing the two cameras, the Canon EOS M200 is better suited for casual photographers who value portability and ease of use. The Canon EOS M50, with its advanced autofocus system and viewfinder, is more suitable for those who require more control and precision in their photography.

In the end, choosing between the Canon EOS M200 and the Canon EOS M50 depends on the individual’s photography needs and preferences. Both cameras offer excellent features, but the M200 is ideal for beginners and casual photographers, while the M50 caters to more experienced photographers seeking advanced capabilities.

The Canon EOS M200 emerges as the winner in the storage and battery category with a score of 21/100, while the Canon EOS M50 lags behind with a score of 13/100. Both cameras share common specs, such as having a single memory card slot and accepting SD, SDHC, and SDXC (UHS-I compatible) memory cards. They also use the same LP-E12 battery type and lack USB charging capabilities.

The EOS M200 outperforms the EOS M50 in terms of battery life, providing 315 shots per charge compared to the M50’s 235 shots. This longer battery life makes the M200 more suitable for extended shooting sessions without needing frequent battery replacements or recharges.

On the other hand, the EOS M50 does not hold any advantage over the M200 in this category, as both cameras share the same storage capabilities and battery type.

Considering the longer battery life of the Canon EOS M200, it is a more reliable option for photographers who require extended shooting durations. The Canon EOS M50, while still a competent camera, falls short in this aspect, making the M200 a better choice for those prioritizing battery life and uninterrupted shooting experiences.

Still not sure which camera is best for you? You can check our recent guides to the best Canon camera for vlogging or the best Canon portrait camera next. You can also try out some more popular camera comparisons for inspiration:

• Canon EOS M50 vs M50 II
• Canon EOS M50 vs Sony a6000
• Canon EOS M50 vs Sony ZV-1
• Canon EOS M50 vs T7 / 2000D
• Canon EOS M50 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7
• Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a6400
• Canon M50 Mark II vs M6 Mark II