Side-by-side specs, scores and live prices. Start over
 62
SCORE
|
✓ WINNER
 65
SCORE
|
|
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Brand | Canon | Sony |
| Model | EOS M200 | ZV-1 |
Released ⓘRefers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. |
2019 | 2020 |
Announcement date ⓘRefers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. |
25/09/2019 | 26/05/2020 |
| Camera type | Mirrorless | Compact |
| Camera size | 108 x 67 x 35 mm | 105 x 60 x 44 mm |
| Camera weight | 229 g | 294 g |
| Optics | ||
Megapixels ⓘThe higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. |
24 MP050 | 20 MP050 |
Image resolution ⓘImage resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. |
6000 x 4000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Sensor type ⓘThe camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. |
CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size ⓘThe sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. |
14.9 x 22.3 | 13.2 x 8.8 |
Sensor format ⓘRefers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |
APS-C | 1" |
Continuous shooting ⓘThe number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. |
6.1 fps045 | 24 fps045 |
Lens mount ⓘThe lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. |
Canon EF-M | Fixed |
Image processor ⓘThe image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. |
Digic 8 | Bionz X |
Aspect ratio ⓘThe aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |
3:2 | 3:2 |
Min ISO ⓘRefers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. |
10030200 | 12530200 |
Max ISO ⓘRefers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. |
256003003280000 | 128003003280000 |
Min ISO (expanded) ⓘExpanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. |
10030200 | 12530200 |
Max ISO (expanded) ⓘExpanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. |
256003003280000 | 256003003280000 |
Minimum shutter speed ⓘThe minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. |
3044080 | 3044080 |
Max shutter speed ⓘThe maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. |
400080032000 | 200080032000 |
Autofocus points ⓘAutofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. |
1430300 | 3150300 |
In-body stabilisation ⓘIn-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |
✗ | ✓ |
Viewfinder type ⓘThe viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. |
None | None |
| Viewfinder dots | N/A | N/A |
| Video | ||
Video ⓘIndicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |
✓ | ✓ |
Max video resolution ⓘThe best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |
4K | 4K |
Max video format ⓘVideo resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. |
3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
Max video frame rate ⓘHow many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. |
60 fps | 120 fps |
Timelapse built in ⓘA built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |
✓ | ✓ |
Video file format ⓘDifferent cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. |
MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Features | ||
Builtin flash ⓘA built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |
✓ | ✓ |
External flash ⓘExternal flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |
✗ | ✗ |
GPS ⓘGPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |
✗ | ✗ |
Weather sealing ⓘWeather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |
✗ | ✗ |
| Screen type | TFT LCD | LCD |
Touch screen ⓘTouchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen dots ⓘScreen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. |
10400001150001500000 | 9216001150001500000 |
Flip screen ⓘA flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |
✓ | ✓ |
Live view ⓘLive View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |
✓ | ✓ |
Wi-Fi ⓘBuilt-in Wi-Fi allows you to connect your camera and share images wirelessly. |
✓ | ✓ |
Bluetooth ⓘBluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Storage & battery | ||
| Memory card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo / Pro-HG Duo |
| Dual memory card slots | ✗ | ✗ |
| Battery type | LP-E12 | NP-BX1 |
Battery life ⓘApproximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. |
315 shots1505000 | 260 shots1505000 |
| USB charging | ✗ | ✓ |
The Sony ZV-1 outperforms the Canon EOS M200 with a score of 65/100 compared to the latter’s 59/100. Both cameras were released in 2019 and 2020, with the Canon EOS M200 being a mirrorless type and the Sony ZV-1 being a compact type. They have similar sizes, with the Canon EOS M200 measuring 108 x 67 x 35mm and weighing 229g, while the Sony ZV-1 measures 105 x 60 x 44mm and weighs 294g.
The Sony ZV-1 excels due to its compact design and better overall performance, justifying its higher launch price of $800 compared to the Canon EOS M200’s $599. On the other hand, the Canon EOS M200 has a lighter weight which could be an advantage for those prioritizing portability.
Taking these factors into account, the Sony ZV-1 is the superior choice for those seeking better performance and compactness, while the Canon EOS M200 may suit those who prefer a lighter camera.
The Sony ZV-1 emerges as the winner in the optics comparison, scoring 67/100, which is 9 points higher than the Canon EOS M200’s score of 58/100. Both cameras share common specifications such as a CMOS sensor and a similar megapixel count, with the M200 having 24 megapixels and the ZV-1 having 20 megapixels. Despite this, the ZV-1 outperforms the M200 in several aspects.
The Sony ZV-1 boasts a faster shooting speed of 24 frames per second, compared to the M200’s 6.1 frames per second. Additionally, the ZV-1 features a Bionz X processor and a higher DXOMARK score of 82 for its sensor, while the M200 has a Digic 8 processor and a DXOMARK score of 58. Furthermore, the ZV-1 has image stabilization, providing users with steadier shots, whereas the M200 lacks this feature.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS M200 has an APS-C sensor size, which is larger than the ZV-1’s 1″ sensor size. This could potentially work in the M200’s favor, providing better image quality in certain situations. Additionally, the M200 has a Canon EF-M lens mount, allowing users to change lenses, while the ZV-1 has a fixed lens mount.
Taking these points into consideration, it is clear that the Sony ZV-1 is superior in terms of optics, due to its faster shooting speed, better image processor, and image stabilization. However, the Canon EOS M200 has some advantages, such as a larger sensor size and the ability to change lenses. Therefore, the choice between these two cameras ultimately depends on the user’s priorities and preferences.
The Sony ZV-1 outperforms the Canon EOS M200 in video capabilities with a score of 91/100 compared to the M200’s 83/100. Both cameras share common specifications, such as 4K max video resolution and 3840 x 2160 max video dimensions. Additionally, they both have built-in time-lapse functionality.
The Sony ZV-1 excels due to its higher max video frame rate of 120fps, doubling the Canon EOS M200’s 60fps. This increased frame rate allows for smoother video capture and superior slow-motion effects. The higher score of the ZV-1 signifies its advantage in video performance.
However, the Canon EOS M200 is not without its merits. Although its video score is lower, it still offers 4K resolution and time-lapse functionality, making it a decent option for casual videographers. The 60fps frame rate may be adequate for users with basic video needs.
In comparing the two cameras, the Sony ZV-1 proves to be the superior choice for those focused on video capabilities due to its higher score and doubled frame rate. The Canon EOS M200, while not as impressive in this category, still presents a viable option for casual users. In the end, the choice depends on the individual’s specific needs and priorities.
The Canon EOS M200 emerges as the winner in the features comparison with a score of 70/100, while the Sony ZV-1 scores 68/100. Both cameras share several specifications, making them quite similar in terms of features. They both have a 3-inch screen, touchscreen capabilities, a flip screen, GPS, WiFi, and Bluetooth connectivity.
The Canon EOS M200 has an edge over the Sony ZV-1 when it comes to screen resolution. With 1,040,000 dots, the EOS M200 offers a clearer and sharper display compared to the ZV-1’s 921,600 dots. This advantage allows users to better review their photos and videos on the camera itself, leading to a more enjoyable and efficient user experience.
However, the Sony ZV-1 does not lag far behind. Despite having a slightly lower features score and screen resolution, it matches the Canon EOS M200 in all other aspects. This means that users can still enjoy the convenience of a touchscreen, flip screen, and various connectivity options. The small difference in screen resolution may not be significant enough to sway some users’ preference, especially if they prioritize other factors like optics or video performance.
Ultimately, the Canon EOS M200 offers a marginally better features package due to its higher screen resolution. However, the Sony ZV-1 remains a strong contender, as it matches the EOS M200 in all other feature specifications. Users should carefully consider their priorities and preferences when choosing between these two cameras, as both offer a solid set of features.
The Sony ZV-1 outperforms the Canon EOS M200 in storage and battery with a score of 29/100, while the Canon EOS M200 scores 21/100. Both cameras have a single memory card slot and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards. However, the Sony ZV-1 also supports Memory Stick Pro Duo and Pro-HG Duo cards, providing additional storage options.
The Canon EOS M200 has a longer battery life of 315 shots, compared to the Sony ZV-1’s 260 shots. Despite this advantage, the Sony ZV-1 offers USB charging, making it more convenient for on-the-go users who need to recharge their camera without swapping batteries.
In terms of storage and battery, the Sony ZV-1’s additional memory card compatibility and USB charging feature make it a better choice for users who prioritize flexibility and convenience. On the other hand, the Canon EOS M200 offers a longer battery life, which may be more suitable for users who require extended shooting sessions without recharging.
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS M200 or the Sony ZV-1:
