If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything).
Prices last updated on .
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything).
Prices last updated on .
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
The Canon EOS R50 outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II with a score of 70/100 compared to 59/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were released in 2020 and 2023, respectively. They share similar dimensions, with the R50 being slightly lighter at 375g compared to the M50 Mark II’s 387g.
The EOS R50 excels due to its lower launch price of $679, while the M50 Mark II was introduced at $750. Despite the price difference, the R50 offers better overall performance. However, the M50 Mark II has a slightly smaller depth, making it more compact.
Considering the specifications and scores, the Canon EOS R50 is the better camera option, offering superior performance at a lower price. The M50 Mark II’s advantage lies in its marginally smaller size.
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs EOS R50 Overview and Optics
The Canon EOS R50 emerges as the winner in the optics comparison, scoring 73/100, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II scores 59/100. Both cameras share some similarities in their specifications, such as having 24-megapixel sensors, CMOS sensor types, APS-C sensor sizes, and a lack of image stabilization. However, there are key differences that set the EOS R50 apart as the superior camera in terms of optics.
The Canon EOS R50 has a faster shooting speed of 12 frames per second compared to the M50 Mark II’s 10 frames per second. This allows the R50 to capture fast-moving subjects more effectively. Moreover, the R50 has a more advanced Digic X processor, which contributes to faster processing and better overall image quality. The R50’s significantly higher DXOMARK score of 94 for the sensor compared to the M50 Mark II’s 58 indicates the former’s superior image quality and performance.
Additionally, the EOS R50 features a Canon RF lens mount, which is compatible with a wider range of high-quality lenses compared to the M50 Mark II’s EF-M lens mount. This gives photographers more flexibility and options when choosing lenses for various shooting situations.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II does not have any distinct advantages in terms of optics when compared to the EOS R50. Both cameras lack image stabilization, which could be a drawback for users who require steadier shots in certain situations.
Considering these factors, the Canon EOS R50 outperforms the M50 Mark II in terms of optics, making it a better choice for photographers seeking superior image quality, faster shooting speeds, and greater lens compatibility.
Optics
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
Canon EOS R50
Megapixels
24 MP
24 MP
Image Resolution
6000 x 4000 px
6000 x 4000 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
14.9 x 22.3 mm
22.3 x 14.9 mm
Sensor Format
APS-C
APS-C
Frame Rate
10 fps
12 fps
Lens Mount
Canon EF-M
Canon RF
Image Processor
Digic 8
Digic X
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Native)
25,600
32,000
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
51200
51200
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 4000 s
1/ 4000 s
Autofocus Points
143
651
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
Electronic
Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution
2,360,000 dots
2,360,000 dots
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs EOS R50 Video Performance
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II and the Canon EOS R50 both have a video score of 91/100, making them equally strong contenders in terms of video capabilities. Both cameras share impressive specs, including a maximum video resolution of 4K (3840 x 2160) and a maximum video frame rate of 120fps. Additionally, both cameras have built-in time-lapse functionality, a feature that is highly appreciated by videographers.
Since both cameras have the same video score, it is essential to look at their individual strengths. The Canon EOS M50 Mark II offers excellent video quality, with crisp and vibrant colors. It is also compact and lightweight, making it a great choice for those who need a portable camera for travel and on-the-go video recording.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS R50 also provides top-notch video quality, but it stands out with its superior autofocus system. This feature ensures that the subjects remain in focus even when they are moving, which is crucial for professional videographers and content creators.
However, it is worth noting that the Canon EOS M50 Mark II is more affordable than the Canon EOS R50. This price difference may be a deciding factor for those on a budget or just starting their journey in videography.
Both cameras excel in video capabilities, but the choice ultimately depends on the user’s priorities. If portability and affordability are the main concerns, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II is the better option. Meanwhile, if autofocus performance is a higher priority, the Canon EOS R50 is the more suitable choice.
Video
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
Canon EOS R50
Video
Max Video Resolution
4K
4K
Max Video Dimensions
3840 x 2160 px
3840 x 2160 px
Max Video Frame Rate
120 p
120 p
Time-Lapse Built In
Video File Format
MPEG-4
MP4, H.264, H.265
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs EOS R50 Features and Benefits
The Canon EOS R50 wins in the comparison of features with a score of 72/100, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II scores 70/100. Both cameras share several specifications, making them similar in some aspects. They both have a 3-inch screen, touchscreen capabilities, flip screens, GPS, WIFI, and Bluetooth connectivity.
The EOS R50 stands out due to its superior screen resolution of 1,620,000 dots, compared to the EOS M50 Mark II’s 1,040,000 dots. This higher resolution provides clearer and more detailed image previews, making it easier for photographers to review their shots. The R50’s advantage in this aspect contributes to its higher feature score.
The EOS M50 Mark II, despite having a lower feature score, still has some strengths. It shares many features with the EOS R50, making it a competitive option for those seeking a camera with similar capabilities. However, it does not excel in any specific area compared to the EOS R50, and its lower screen resolution may be a drawback for some users.
Taking all of these factors into account, the Canon EOS R50 is the better camera in terms of features due to its higher screen resolution. This advantage makes it the preferred choice for photographers who value image clarity and detail. On the other hand, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II remains a viable option for those who are content with its shared features and are not particularly concerned about screen resolution.
Features
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
Canon EOS R50
Built-in Flash
External Flash
GPS
Weather Sealing
Screen Type
TFT LCD
LCD
Touch Screen
Screen Size
3"
3"
Screen Resolution
1,040,000 dots
1,620,000 dots
Flip Screen
Live View
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs EOS R50 Storage and Battery
The Canon EOS R50 outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in storage and battery, scoring 35/100 compared to the M50 Mark II’s 21/100. Both cameras have a single memory card slot and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards. However, the R50 is compatible with both UHS-I and II cards, while the M50 Mark II only supports UHS-I cards.
The R50 also provides a longer battery life of 370 shots, using the LP-E17 battery type. In contrast, the M50 Mark II offers 305 shots with its LP-E12 battery. Additionally, the R50 features USB charging, which the M50 Mark II lacks.
Despite the lower score, the M50 Mark II still provides adequate storage and battery performance for casual users. However, the R50’s compatibility with faster memory cards, longer battery life, and USB charging make it a better choice for those who need more storage and power capabilities.
If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything).
Prices last updated on .
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything).
Prices last updated on .
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.