CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs EOS R7 Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Canon EOS M50 Mark II

canon eos m50 mark ii
59%

Canon EOS R7

canon eos r7
Winner!
83%
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
vs
Canon EOS R7
Price
750
1500
Brand
Canon
Canon
Model
EOS M50 Mark II
EOS R7
Released
2020
2022
Announcement Date
14/10/2020
24/05/2022
Camera Type
Mirrorless
Mirrorless
Camera Size
116 x 88 x 59 mm
132 x 90 x 92 mm
Camera Weight
387
612
Compare

The Canon EOS R7 outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II with a score of 83/100 compared to 59/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were released in 2020 and 2022, respectively. They share similarities in size and weight, with the R7 being slightly larger and heavier at 132 x 90 x 92mm and 612g, while the M50 Mark II measures 116 x 88 x 59mm and weighs 387g.

The EOS R7’s higher score indicates its superior performance. With a launch price of $1500, it offers more advanced features and better image quality than the M50 Mark II, priced at $750. However, the M50 Mark II has its own advantages, such as being more compact and lightweight, which makes it easier to carry around.

When considering the specifications, the Canon EOS R7 is the clear winner in terms of performance, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II may suit those looking for a more affordable and portable option.

Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs EOS R7 Overview and Optics

The Canon EOS R7 outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in optics, with a score of 82/100 compared to the M50 Mark II’s 59/100. Both cameras share several similarities in their specifications, including a CMOS sensor type, APS-C sensor size, and compatibility with Canon lenses through their respective lens mounts – the M50 Mark II with the Canon EF-M mount, and the EOS R7 with the Canon RF mount.

The EOS R7’s superior performance in optics is due to several factors. It has a higher megapixel count at 33 compared to the M50 Mark II’s 24, allowing for greater image detail and resolution. The shooting speed of the R7 is also faster at 15 frames per second, compared to the M50 Mark II’s 10 frames per second. This allows for capturing more images in a shorter amount of time, such as in action or sports photography. The R7 also benefits from a more advanced processor, the Digic X, and a significantly higher DXOMARK score for the sensor at 97, as opposed to the M50 Mark II’s Digic 8 processor and sensor score of 58. Furthermore, the EOS R7 has built-in image stabilization, which the M50 Mark II lacks.

The M50 Mark II, however, does have some advantages. Its EF-M lens mount is compatible with a wider range of lenses, providing more options for photographers. Additionally, the lower megapixel count can result in better low-light performance and faster image processing.

Considering these factors, the Canon EOS R7 is the clear winner in terms of optics, offering higher resolution images, faster shooting speeds, and better overall image quality. The M50 Mark II, while not as strong in this category, still provides versatility through its lens compatibility.

Optics
Optics
59%
82%
Megapixels
24 MP
33 MP
Image Resolution
6000 x 4000 px
6960 x 4640 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
14.9 x 22.3 mm
22.2 x 14.8 mm
Sensor Format
APS-C
APS-C
Frame Rate
10 fps
15 fps
Lens Mount
Canon EF-M
Canon RF
Image Processor
Digic 8
Digic X
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Native)
25600
32000
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
51200
51200
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 4000 s
1/ 8000 s
Autofocus Points
143
651
In-body Stabilization
1
Viewfinder Type
Electronic
Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution
2360000 dots
2360000 dots

Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs EOS R7 Video Performance

The Canon EOS M50 Mark II and the Canon EOS R7 both receive a video score of 91/100, indicating that their video capabilities are on par with each other. They share several key specifications, making them equally competitive in the realm of video performance.

Both cameras possess a maximum video resolution of 4K, and their maximum video dimensions are identical at 3840 x 2160. This means that users can expect high-resolution video output from either camera. Additionally, both cameras have a maximum video frame rate of 120fps, enabling smooth and seamless motion capture for various video projects. The presence of built-in time-lapse functionality in both cameras further enhances their video capabilities, providing users with more creative options for their projects.

Although the Canon EOS M50 Mark II and the Canon EOS R7 share the same video score and specifications, it is essential to consider other factors, such as price, sensor size, and lens compatibility, to determine which camera better suits a user’s specific needs. However, based solely on video capabilities, both cameras prove to be strong contenders.

Given their identical video scores and specifications, it is difficult to declare a definitive winner between the Canon EOS M50 Mark II and the Canon EOS R7. Users must evaluate their individual requirements and preferences to determine the most suitable camera for their video projects. Regardless of their choice, both cameras offer impressive video performance that will satisfy the needs of various users.

Video
Video
91%
91%
Video
1
1
Max Video Resolution
4K
4K
Max Video Dimensions
3840 x 2160 px
3840 x 2160 px
Max Video Frame Rate
120 p
120 p
Time-Lapse Built In
1
1
Video File Format
MPEG-4
MPEG-4, MOV

Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs EOS R7 Features and Benefits

The Canon EOS R7 wins the features comparison with a score of 85/100, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II scores 70/100. Both cameras share several common specifications. They both have a 3-inch touchscreen, flip screen, and lack GPS. Additionally, they come equipped with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity.

The Canon EOS R7 outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in screen resolution, offering 1,620,000 dots compared to the M50 Mark II’s 1,040,000 dots. This higher resolution provides the R7 with a sharper and clearer display, allowing for better image preview and review. This advantage makes the R7 a more suitable choice for photographers who value high-quality image preview.

On the other hand, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has no clear advantages over the Canon EOS R7 in terms of features. Both cameras share the same screen size, flip screen, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and lack of GPS. This similarity in features means that the M50 Mark II does not offer any additional benefits over the R7 in this category.

Considering the higher feature score and superior screen resolution, the Canon EOS R7 is the better camera in terms of features. The M50 Mark II does not provide any significant advantages over the R7, making the R7 the more appealing choice for photographers seeking a camera with excellent features.

Features
Features
70%
85%
Built-in Flash
1
External Flash
1
1
GPS
Weather Sealing
1
Screen Type
TFT LCD
TFT LCD
Touch Screen
1
1
Screen Size
3
3
Screen Resolution
1040000 dots
1620000 dots
Flip Screen
1
1
Live View
1
1
Wi-Fi
1
1
Bluetooth
1
1

Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs EOS R7 Storage and Battery

The Canon EOS R7 outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in storage and battery with a score of 79/100, compared to the M50 Mark II’s 21/100. Both cameras accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards. However, the R7 is UHS-II compatible, while the M50 Mark II is only UHS-I compatible.

The R7 surpasses the M50 Mark II with two memory card slots, doubling storage capacity. Additionally, the R7 has a longer battery life of 660 shots, compared to the M50 Mark II’s 305 shots. The R7 uses the LP-E6NH battery type and offers USB charging, making it more convenient for on-the-go use.

On the other hand, the M50 Mark II has a limited advantage in storage and battery. It has only one memory card slot and a shorter battery life of 305 shots, using the LP-E12 battery type. Furthermore, it lacks USB charging capabilities.

Considering these points, the Canon EOS R7 clearly excels in storage and battery performance, offering more memory card slots, better compatibility, longer battery life, and USB charging. This makes it a superior choice for photographers seeking convenience and extended shooting capabilities.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
21%
79%
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible)
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible)
Dual Memory Card Slots
1
Battery Type
LP-E12
LP-E6NH
Battery Life
305 shots
660 shots
USB Charging
1
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Scores
Main Features
Extra Features
Construction and Durability
Handling and Ergonomics
Value for Money
Total Score

Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs EOS R7 – Our Verdict

Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs EOS R7 Comparison image.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS M50 Mark II or the Canon EOS R7:

User Scores
B&H photo video
1
1
amazon
Spotted a mistake with these specs? Please let us know so we can update it!