Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs EOS Rebel T100 / 4000D Comparison

The Canon EOS M50 Mark II outperforms the Canon EOS Rebel T100 / 4000D with a score of 59/100 compared to 41/100. Both cameras share similarities such as being released in recent years (M50 Mark II in 2020 and Rebel T100 in 2018) and having a similar launch price range ($750 for M50 Mark II and $400 for Rebel T100).

The M50 Mark II has the advantage of being a mirrorless camera, which makes it lighter (387g / 0.85lbs) and more compact (116 x 88 x 59mm) than the Rebel T100, a DSLR camera weighing 475g / 1.05lbs with dimensions of 129 x 102 x 77mm. This makes the M50 Mark II more portable and convenient for travel and everyday use.

On the other hand, the Rebel T100’s lower launch price makes it more accessible for those on a tighter budget. However, its DSLR nature means it is bulkier and heavier than the M50 Mark II.

Taking these specifications into account, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II offers better portability and convenience, while the Canon EOS Rebel T100 / 4000D provides a more budget-friendly option.

Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs EOS Rebel T100 / 4000D Overview and Optics

The Canon EOS M50 Mark II wins in the optics comparison with a score of 59/100, while the Canon EOS Rebel T100 / 4000D scores 39/100. Both cameras share some common specifications: they have CMOS sensors, APS-C sensor sizes, and no image stabilization. However, there are notable differences that give the M50 Mark II an advantage.

Firstly, the M50 Mark II has a higher megapixel count at 24, compared to the T100 / 4000D’s 18 megapixels. This means the M50 Mark II can capture more detail and produce higher resolution images. Additionally, the M50 Mark II boasts a significantly faster shooting speed of 10 frames per second, while the T100 / 4000D only manages 3 frames per second. This makes the M50 Mark II better suited for capturing fast-moving subjects and action shots.

Moreover, the M50 Mark II features a more advanced Digic 8 processor, which contributes to faster processing and better overall performance. On the other hand, the T100 / 4000D has a lower-performing Digic 4+ processor. The lens mount on the M50 Mark II is Canon EF-M, while the T100 / 4000D uses Canon EF-S.

Despite its lower overall score, the T100 / 4000D does have a higher DXOMARK sensor score of 63, compared to the M50 Mark II’s score of 58. This indicates that the T100 / 4000D’s sensor performs slightly better in terms of image quality.

Taking these factors into account, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II is the superior camera in terms of optics, with better resolution, shooting speed, and processing. However, the Canon EOS Rebel T100 / 4000D does have a marginally better sensor performance, which could be a consideration for some users.

The Canon EOS M50 Mark II outperforms the Canon EOS Rebel T100 / 4000D in video capabilities, scoring 91/100 compared to the T100’s 43/100. Both cameras share some common video specifications, including the ability to record in different resolutions and frame rates. However, the M50 Mark II surpasses the T100 in various aspects, making it the superior choice for video recording.

The M50 Mark II boasts a maximum video resolution of 4K (3840 x 2160), whereas the T100 can only reach Full HD (1920 x 1080). This results in significantly higher video quality with the M50 Mark II, providing more detail and clarity for professional and casual videographers alike. Additionally, the M50 Mark II offers a maximum video frame rate of 120fps, enabling smooth slow-motion footage. In comparison, the T100’s maximum frame rate is limited to 30fps.

Another advantage the M50 Mark II has over the T100 is its built-in time-lapse functionality, which allows users to create captivating time-lapse videos without needing external software or equipment. The T100 lacks this feature, making it less versatile for those interested in time-lapse photography.

Despite its lower score, the T100 may still be a suitable option for those with limited budgets or beginner photographers who do not require advanced video features. However, it is important to note that the camera’s video capabilities are significantly inferior to those of the M50 Mark II.

Given the substantial difference in video scores and the M50 Mark II’s superior specifications, it is evident that the Canon EOS M50 Mark II is the better choice for those prioritizing video capabilities. While the T100 may suffice for basic video needs, the M50 Mark II offers a more comprehensive and versatile video recording experience.

The Canon EOS M50 Mark II outperforms the Canon EOS Rebel T100 / 4000D with a feature score of 70/100 compared to 47/100. Both cameras share some specifications, including the lack of GPS, and the presence of WIFI and Bluetooth connectivity.

The EOS M50 Mark II excels with a larger screen size of 3 inches and a higher screen resolution of 1,040,000 dots, providing a clearer and more enjoyable viewing experience. Additionally, it features a touchscreen, making menu navigation and settings adjustments more intuitive. The M50 Mark II also boasts a flip screen, allowing for versatile shooting angles and aiding in self-portraits or vlogging.

On the other hand, the EOS Rebel T100 / 4000D has a smaller 2.7-inch screen with a lower resolution of 230,000 dots, which results in less clarity and detail. It lacks a touchscreen and flip screen, limiting its ease of use and shooting flexibility.

While the EOS M50 Mark II is clearly superior in features, the EOS Rebel T100 / 4000D may still hold some appeal to budget-conscious buyers or those seeking a more basic, entry-level camera. It shares essential connectivity options with the M50 Mark II, ensuring that users can still transfer images wirelessly and control the camera remotely.

To conclude, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II is a better camera in terms of features, offering a larger and higher-resolution touchscreen, along with a flip screen for added versatility. The EOS Rebel T100 / 4000D, while more limited in features, may still be suitable for beginners or those on a tight budget.

The Canon EOS Rebel T100 / 4000D outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in storage and battery with a score of 27/100, compared to the M50 Mark II’s 21/100. Both cameras share some common specifications: they each have one memory card slot and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards. Additionally, neither camera supports USB charging.

The Rebel T100 / 4000D has a longer battery life, providing 500 shots per charge, while the M50 Mark II only offers 305 shots. This makes the Rebel T100 / 4000D more suitable for extended photography sessions. Moreover, the Rebel T100 / 4000D uses an LP-E10 battery type, whereas the M50 Mark II uses an LP-E12.

Despite the M50 Mark II’s lower score, it accepts UHS-I compatible memory cards, allowing for faster data transfer. This could benefit photographers who require swift access to their files.

Considering the storage and battery aspects, the Canon EOS Rebel T100 / 4000D proves to be a better choice for extended use, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II offers a slight advantage in memory card compatibility.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS M50 Mark II or the Canon EOS Rebel T100 / 4000D:

• Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs EOS R10
• Canon EOS M50 vs EOS M50 Mark II
• Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs EOS R50
• Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a6400
• Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony ZV-E10
• Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs EOS M6 Mark II