Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Rebel EOS SL3 / 250D Comparison

Canon M50 Mark II vs Rebel SL3 Overview and Optics

The Canon Rebel EOS SL3 wins in the optics comparison with a score of 61/100, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II scores 59/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, including 24 megapixels, a CMOS sensor, a Digic 8 processor, and an APS-C sensor size.

The SL3 / 250D outperforms the M50 Mark II in two key areas. First, it has a higher DXOMARK score for the sensor, 64 compared to 58, which contributes to better image quality. Second, the SL3 / 250D features image stabilisation, providing steadier and sharper images. Additionally, the SL3 / 250D has a Canon EF/EF-S lens mount, offering a wider range of compatible lenses for photographers to choose from.

On the other hand, the M50 Mark II has a faster shooting speed of 10 frames per second, compared to the SL3 / 250D’s 5 frames per second. This advantage allows the M50 Mark II to capture fast-moving subjects more effectively. However, the M50 Mark II has a Canon EF-M lens mount, which has fewer lens options compared to the Canon EF/EF-S mount.

Considering the points mentioned above, the Canon SL3 / 250D proves to be the better option in terms of optics due to its higher sensor score and image stabilisation feature. Meanwhile, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II offers an advantage in shooting speed, making it suitable for capturing fast action. Ultimately, the choice between the two cameras depends on the photographer’s specific needs and priorities.

The Canon EOS M50 Mark II emerges as the winner in the video capabilities comparison, with a score of 91 out of 100, as opposed to the Canon Rebel EOS SL3 / 250D, which scores 83. Both cameras share some common specifications, including 4K maximum video resolution, 3840 x 2160 video dimensions, and built-in time-lapse functionality.

The EOS M50 Mark II outperforms the Rebel SL3 / 250D in terms of maximum video frame rate, offering 120fps compared to the latter’s 60fps. This higher frame rate allows for smoother video playback and better slow-motion capabilities, making the M50 Mark II a more versatile option for videographers.

While the Rebel SL3 / 250D falls short in the frame rate department, it still delivers quality video performance with its 4K resolution and built-in time-lapse functionality. For casual users and those who do not require exceptionally high frame rates, the SL3 / 250D remains a solid option.

To sum up, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II takes the lead in video performance due to its superior maximum video frame rate, making it a more suitable choice for videographers who require smooth and slow-motion capabilities. On the other hand, the Canon Rebel EOS SL3 / 250D remains a reliable option for those who prioritize 4K resolution and time-lapse functionality without the need for a higher frame rate.

The Canon EOS M50 Mark II and the Canon Rebel EOS SL3 / 250D both have a feature score of 70/100, making it a tie between the two cameras. They share several specifications, such as a 3-inch screen size, 1,040,000-dot screen resolution, touchscreen capabilities, flip screen, and the absence of GPS. Both cameras also have WIFI and Bluetooth connectivity.

The Canon EOS M50 Mark II stands out in certain aspects such as its mirrorless design, which makes it lighter and more compact than the Canon Rebel EOS SL3 / 250D. This feature can be an advantage for photographers who prefer to carry lighter gear or for those who travel frequently. Additionally, the M50 Mark II has a slightly faster continuous shooting speed at 7.4 frames per second, compared to the SL3’s 5 frames per second, making it a better choice for capturing fast-moving subjects.

On the other hand, the Canon Rebel EOS SL3 / 250D has a few advantages over the M50 Mark II. One of these is its optical viewfinder, which allows photographers to compose their shots without relying on the camera’s LCD screen. This feature can be particularly useful in bright outdoor conditions where the screen may be difficult to see. Furthermore, the SL3 / 250D has a longer battery life, allowing for more shots per charge compared to the M50 Mark II.

Given the similarities and differences between the Canon EOS M50 Mark II and the Canon Rebel EOS SL3 / 250D, the choice between the two cameras ultimately depends on the individual photographer’s needs and preferences. The M50 Mark II may be better suited for those who value a compact design and faster continuous shooting, while the SL3 / 250D may be more appealing for photographers who prefer an optical viewfinder and longer battery life.

The Canon Rebel EOS SL3 / 250D outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in storage and battery, with a score of 45/100 compared to 21/100. Both cameras have one memory card slot and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC (UHS-I compatible) cards. Neither camera supports USB charging.

The Rebel EOS SL3 / 250D excels with its impressive battery life of 1070 shots, significantly more than the M50 Mark II’s 305 shots. This advantage stems from the SL3 / 250D’s use of the LP-E17 battery type.

The M50 Mark II, however, does not surpass the Rebel EOS SL3 / 250D in any aspect of storage and battery.

Considering these factors, the Rebel EOS SL3 / 250D is the superior choice for those seeking a camera with better storage and battery capabilities. The M50 Mark II falls short in this area, making it less suitable for extended shooting sessions without access to a power source.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS M50 Mark II or the Canon Rebel EOS SL3 / 250D:

• Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs EOS R10
• Canon EOS Rebel T8i / 850D vs Rebel EOS SL3 / 250D
• Canon EOS M50 vs EOS M50 Mark II
• Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs EOS R50
• Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a6400
• Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony ZV-E10