Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a6300 Comparison
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
Sony a6300
MirrorlessMirrorlessThe Sony a6300 takes the lead with a score of 61/100, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II trails close behind at 59/100. Both cameras are mirrorless, announced in 2016 and 2020, and have similar launch prices of $1000 and $750, respectively. The Canon EOS M50 Mark II is slightly smaller and lighter, measuring 116 x 88 x 59mm and weighing 387g, compared to the Sony a6300’s dimensions of 120 x 67 x 49mm and weight of 404g.
The Sony a6300 emerges as the winner due to its higher score, which is quite possibly a result of its more advanced features and better overall performance. On the other hand, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II may have some advantages, such as its smaller size and lighter weight, making it more portable and convenient for photographers on the go.
Taking these factors into account, potential buyers should consider their specific needs and preferences when choosing between the Canon EOS M50 Mark II and the Sony a6300.
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a6300 Overview and Optics
The Sony a6300 triumphs over the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in terms of optics, scoring 68/100 compared to the latter’s 59/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, APS-C sensor size, and the absence of image stabilization. Additionally, both cameras have proprietary lens mounts, with the Canon utilizing the EF-M mount and the Sony using the E mount.
The Sony a6300 outperforms the Canon in several aspects. With 24.2 megapixels, it has a slight edge in resolution compared to the Canon’s 24 megapixels. Its shooting speed is also marginally faster at 11 frames per second (fps) versus the Canon’s 10 fps. Most notably, the Sony a6300 boasts a significantly higher DXOMARK score for its sensor, 85 against the Canon’s 58. This means the Sony camera delivers superior image quality and better low-light performance.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has a few advantages over the Sony a6300. Its Digic 8 processor is more recent and advanced than the Sony’s Bionz X processor, potentially offering better image processing capabilities. However, this advantage does not translate into a higher DXOMARK score or a noticeable difference in overall image quality.
The Sony a6300’s superior optics performance, as evidenced by its higher score and better specifications, makes it the better choice for photographers prioritizing image quality. The Canon EOS M50 Mark II, while having a more advanced processor, falls short in terms of optics and image quality when compared to the Sony a6300.
APS-CAPS-C
3:23:2
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a6300 Video Performance
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II and the Sony a6300 both have a video score of 91/100, making them equal in terms of video capabilities. Both cameras share common specifications, such as 4K max video resolution, max video dimensions of 3840 x 2160, and a max video frame rate of 120fps. Additionally, they both have built-in time-lapse functionality.
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II excels in its user-friendly interface, which makes navigating and adjusting settings quicker and more intuitive. This advantage allows users to focus on capturing high-quality video instead of fumbling with complicated settings. The M50 Mark II also has a fully articulated touchscreen, providing more flexibility when framing shots and reviewing footage.
On the other hand, the Sony a6300 has a more robust build quality, making it a more durable option for those who need a sturdy camera for various shooting conditions. The a6300 also offers more advanced autofocus capabilities, ensuring sharp and accurate focus during video recording.
Considering these points, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II is better suited for users who prioritize ease of use and flexibility in framing. The Sony a6300 is a more suitable choice for those who require a durable camera with advanced autofocus capabilities. Both cameras offer excellent video performance, making them strong contenders for anyone looking to capture high-quality footage.
4K4K
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a6300 Features and Benefits
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II outperforms the Sony a6300 in terms of features, with a score of 70/100 compared to the Sony’s 54/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as a 3-inch screen size, the absence of GPS, and the presence of WIFI connectivity. However, there are differences that make the Canon EOS M50 Mark II a better choice in terms of features.
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II has a higher screen resolution of 1,040,000 dots, compared to the Sony a6300’s 921,600 dots. This difference provides a clearer and more detailed view of the images on the Canon’s screen. Moreover, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has a touchscreen, which makes it easier to navigate through menus and adjust settings quickly. It also has Bluetooth connectivity, allowing for a smoother and more efficient transfer of files and remote control of the camera.
On the other hand, the Sony a6300 also has a flip screen, which is a useful feature for composing shots from various angles. However, this advantage is not enough to overcome the superior features offered by the Canon EOS M50 Mark II.
Given these differences, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II is the better camera in terms of features. Its higher screen resolution, touchscreen, and Bluetooth connectivity provide a more user-friendly and efficient experience for photographers. Although the Sony a6300 has a flip screen, it falls short in other areas, making the Canon EOS M50 Mark II the preferred choice when considering these specific features.
3"3"
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a6300 Storage and Battery
The Sony a6300 wins in the storage and battery category with a score of 24/100, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II scores 21/100. Both cameras share similarities in storage, having one memory card slot each and compatibility with SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards. However, the a6300 holds an advantage in battery life, providing 400 shots compared to the M50 Mark II’s 305 shots. This longer battery life makes the Sony a6300 more suitable for extended shooting sessions.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II uses the LP-E12 battery type, while the Sony a6300 uses the NP-FW50 battery type. Both cameras lack USB charging capabilities.
Considering these points, the Sony a6300 offers better battery life, making it more convenient for longer usage. However, the difference in score is not significant, and both cameras have similar storage capabilities.
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a6300 – Our Verdict
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS M50 Mark II or the Sony a6300: