Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a6400 Comparison

The Sony a6400 emerges as the winner with a score of 70/100, outperforming the Canon EOS M50 Mark II, which scored 59/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were released in 2019 and 2020, respectively. They share similar dimensions, with the Sony a6400 measuring 120 x 67 x 60mm and the Canon EOS M50 Mark II at 116 x 88 x 59mm. The Sony a6400 is slightly heavier at 403g, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II weighs 387g.

The Sony a6400’s higher score indicates better performance in terms of specifications. It offers more advanced features, justifying its higher launch price of $900 compared to the Canon EOS M50 Mark II’s $750 price tag. However, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II still has its advantages, such as its lighter weight, making it more portable and convenient for photography enthusiasts.

Taking these factors into account, the Sony a6400 proves to be the superior option for those seeking more advanced features, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II is better suited for those prioritizing portability and a lower price point.

Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a6400 Overview and Optics

The Sony a6400 wins the optics comparison with a score of 68/100, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II scores 59/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as having 24-megapixel CMOS sensors, APS-C sensor size, and no image stabilization. They also have different lens mounts, with the Canon using the EF-M mount and the Sony using the E mount.

The Sony a6400 outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in several aspects. Firstly, the a6400 has a slightly higher shooting speed of 11 compared to the M50 Mark II’s 10. This means that the a6400 can capture more frames per second, which is beneficial for action photography. Furthermore, the a6400 has a better DXOMARK score for the sensor, at 83 compared to the M50 Mark II’s 58. This indicates that the a6400’s sensor performs better in terms of image quality and low-light performance.

On the other hand, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has the advantage of using the Digic 8 processor, which is known for its fast and efficient performance. However, this advantage does not outweigh the benefits offered by the Sony a6400’s superior sensor and shooting speed.

Taking all these factors into account, the Sony a6400 emerges as the better camera in terms of optics. Its higher score reflects its superior sensor performance and faster shooting speed, making it a more suitable choice for photographers who prioritize image quality and action photography. While the Canon EOS M50 Mark II’s processor is a strong feature, it is not enough to compensate for the shortcomings in its sensor and shooting speed.

The Canon EOS M50 Mark II and the Sony a6400 both have impressive video capabilities, with each camera scoring 91/100. They share several key features, making them strong contenders for videography enthusiasts.

Both cameras boast 4K video resolution, ensuring high-quality footage with maximum dimensions of 3840 x 2160. Additionally, they offer a maximum video frame rate of 120fps, allowing for smooth slow-motion capture. Time-lapse functionality is built into each camera, providing users with creative options for dynamic video content.

Despite the identical scores, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has some advantages over the Sony a6400. The M50 Mark II is known for its user-friendly interface and touch-screen controls, making it more accessible for beginners. Furthermore, Canon’s color science is often praised for producing vibrant and accurate colors, which can enhance video footage.

On the other hand, the Sony a6400 offers benefits that the Canon EOS M50 Mark II lacks. The a6400 has a longer battery life, which is essential for extended video shoots. Additionally, the camera’s autofocus system is renowned for its speed and accuracy, ensuring sharp focus on subjects throughout your video clips.

Taking these factors into account, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II is an excellent choice for users who value ease of use and vibrant colors in their video content. The Sony a6400, however, is better suited for those who prioritize battery life and autofocus performance. Ultimately, both cameras provide high-quality video capabilities, and the choice between them depends on individual preferences and specific shooting requirements.

The Sony a6400 wins the features comparison with a score of 81/100, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II scores 70/100. Both cameras share several common features, which include a 3-inch touchscreen, flip screen, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth connectivity. Neither camera has GPS capabilities.

The Sony a6400 is superior in terms of screen resolution, offering 921,600 dots compared to the Canon EOS M50 Mark II’s 1,040,000 dots. This means that the a6400 provides a sharper and clearer display, allowing for better image review and menu navigation. The higher feature score of the Sony a6400 reflects its overall advantage in terms of camera features.

Despite its lower feature score, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II still has some advantages. Its touchscreen is more responsive, which makes it easier to navigate menus and adjust settings. Additionally, the M50 Mark II has a more user-friendly interface, making it a better option for beginners who may find the a6400’s menu system more complex and difficult to navigate.

Taking these factors into account, the Sony a6400 is the better camera in terms of features, with a higher score and a superior screen resolution. However, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II offers a more responsive touchscreen and user-friendly interface, making it a viable option for those seeking a simpler camera experience. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras will depend on individual preferences and the specific needs of the photographer.

The Sony a6400 outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in storage and battery, scoring 37/100 compared to the Canon’s 21/100. Both cameras have a single memory card slot and are compatible with SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards, while the Sony a6400 also accepts Memory Stick Duo cards.

The a6400’s battery life is superior, offering 410 shots compared to the M50 Mark II’s 305 shots. The Sony a6400 uses an NP-FW50 battery, while the Canon relies on an LP-E12 battery. Additionally, the a6400 has the advantage of USB charging, which the M50 Mark II lacks.

Despite the lower score, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II still offers decent battery life and compatibility with widely available memory cards. However, the Sony a6400 clearly provides better battery performance and more storage options.

Considering these factors, the Sony a6400 stands out as the stronger choice in terms of storage and battery capabilities, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II remains a reasonable option for those who prioritize other features.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS M50 Mark II or the Sony a6400:

• Nikon Z50 vs Sony a6400
• Sony a6400 vs a6600
• Nikon Z30 vs Sony a6400
• Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs EOS R10
• Sony a6400 vs a7 II
• Canon EOS M50 vs EOS M50 Mark II