Side-by-side specs, scores and live prices. Start over
 59
SCORE
|
✓ WINNER
 84
SCORE
|
|
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Brand | Canon | Sony |
| Model | EOS M50 Mark II | a7 IV |
Released ⓘRefers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. |
2020 | 2021 |
Announcement date ⓘRefers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. |
14/10/2020 | 21/10/2021 |
| Camera type | Mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Camera size | 116 x 88 x 59 mm | 131 x 96 x 80 mm |
| Camera weight | 387 g | 659 g |
| Optics | ||
Megapixels ⓘThe higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. |
24 MP050 | 33 MP050 |
Image resolution ⓘImage resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. |
6000 x 4000 | 7008 x 4672 |
Sensor type ⓘThe camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. |
CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size ⓘThe sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. |
14.9 x 22.3 | 23.8 x 35.6 |
Sensor format ⓘRefers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |
APS-C | Full Frame |
Continuous shooting ⓘThe number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. |
10 fps045 | 10 fps045 |
Lens mount ⓘThe lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. |
Canon EF-M | Sony E |
Image processor ⓘThe image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. |
Digic 8 | Bionz XR |
Aspect ratio ⓘThe aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |
3:2 | 3:2 |
Min ISO ⓘRefers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. |
10030200 | 10030200 |
Max ISO ⓘRefers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. |
256003003280000 | 512003003280000 |
Min ISO (expanded) ⓘExpanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. |
10030200 | 5030200 |
Max ISO (expanded) ⓘExpanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. |
512003003280000 | 2044003003280000 |
Minimum shutter speed ⓘThe minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. |
3044080 | 3044080 |
Max shutter speed ⓘThe maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. |
400080032000 | 800080032000 |
Autofocus points ⓘAutofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. |
1430300 | 7590300 |
In-body stabilisation ⓘIn-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |
✗ | ✓ |
Viewfinder type ⓘThe viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. |
Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder dots | 236000009900000 | 368640009900000 |
| Video | ||
Video ⓘIndicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |
✓ | ✓ |
Max video resolution ⓘThe best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |
4K | 4K |
Max video format ⓘVideo resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. |
3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
Max video frame rate ⓘHow many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. |
120 fps | 120 fps |
Timelapse built in ⓘA built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |
✓ | ✓ |
Video file format ⓘDifferent cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. |
MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, XAVC S, XAVC HS, XAVC S-I, H.264, H.265 |
| Features | ||
Builtin flash ⓘA built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |
✓ | ✗ |
External flash ⓘExternal flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |
✓ | ✓ |
GPS ⓘGPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |
✗ | ✗ |
Weather sealing ⓘWeather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |
✗ | ✓ |
| Screen type | TFT LCD | LCD |
Touch screen ⓘTouchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen dots ⓘScreen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. |
10400001150001500000 | 10400001150001500000 |
Flip screen ⓘA flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |
✓ | ✓ |
Live view ⓘLive View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |
✓ | ✓ |
Wi-Fi ⓘBuilt-in Wi-Fi allows you to connect your camera and share images wirelessly. |
✓ | ✓ |
Bluetooth ⓘBluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Storage & battery | ||
| Memory card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | CFexpress Type A, SD (UHS-II compatible) |
| Dual memory card slots | ✗ | ✓ |
| Battery type | LP-E12 | NP-FZ100 |
Battery life ⓘApproximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. |
305 shots1505000 | 580 shots1505000 |
| USB charging | ✗ | ✓ |
The Sony a7 IV outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II with a score of 84/100 compared to 59/100. Both cameras are mirrorless models released in 2020 and 2021, respectively. They have similar design elements, with the Canon being smaller and lighter, measuring 116 x 88 x 59mm and weighing 387g, while the Sony measures 131 x 96 x 80mm and weighs 659g.
The Sony a7 IV is superior in terms of performance, as reflected in its higher score. However, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has its advantages, particularly its compact size and lighter weight, making it more portable and convenient for casual users. The Sony a7 IV comes with a heftier price tag at $2499 compared to the Canon’s $750, but its advanced features and higher score justify the investment for serious photographers.
Ultimately, the Sony a7 IV proves to be the better camera for professionals, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II is ideal for those seeking a more affordable and portable option without compromising on quality.
The Sony a7 IV surpasses the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in optics, scoring 85 out of 100 compared to the Canon’s 59. Both cameras possess 10 fps shooting speed, CMOS sensors, and lens mounts compatible with their respective brands. However, the Sony a7 IV outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in several aspects.
The Sony a7 IV has a higher megapixel count at 33, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has 24 megapixels. This difference allows the Sony a7 IV to capture more detail and produce higher resolution images. The Sony a7 IV also has a more advanced processor, the Bionz XR, compared to the Canon’s Digic 8. A better processor contributes to faster image processing and improved overall performance.
Furthermore, the Sony a7 IV has a full-frame sensor, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has an APS-C sensor. A full-frame sensor provides better low-light performance, increased dynamic range, and shallower depth of field. The Sony a7 IV also has a higher DXOMARK sensor score at 97, compared to the Canon’s 58. This score reflects the sensor’s overall image quality. Additionally, the Sony a7 IV features image stabilization, which the Canon EOS M50 Mark II lacks. Image stabilization helps reduce camera shake and improve image sharpness in handheld shooting situations.
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II does not have any significant advantages over the Sony a7 IV in terms of optics. Given the differences in sensor size, megapixels, processor, and image stabilization, the Sony a7 IV proves to be a better camera in this comparison. Potential buyers should consider these factors when choosing between the two cameras.
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II and the Sony a7 IV both have a video score of 91/100, making them equal contenders in video capabilities. Both cameras share common specifications, such as a maximum video resolution of 4K, video dimensions of 3840 x 2160, a maximum video frame rate of 120fps, and built-in time-lapse functionality.
Despite having identical scores, there are areas where one camera outperforms the other. The Sony a7 IV excels in its low light performance and dynamic range, making it a better choice for shooting in challenging lighting conditions. Additionally, the a7 IV has a larger sensor than the M50 Mark II, allowing for better overall image quality and improved depth of field control.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has a more user-friendly interface, making it easier for beginners to navigate and adjust settings. The M50 Mark II also has a more compact and lightweight design, making it a more convenient option for travel and on-the-go shooting.
When comparing the video capabilities of the Canon EOS M50 Mark II and the Sony a7 IV, both cameras have impressive features and performance. The Sony a7 IV is the better choice for those needing superior low light performance and image quality, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II is ideal for beginners and those who prioritize portability.
The Sony a7 IV outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in features, earning a score of 83/100 compared to the Canon’s 70/100. Both cameras share several specifications, which include a 3-inch screen size, 1040000-dot screen resolution, touchscreen, flip screen, absence of GPS, and the presence of both WIFI and Bluetooth connectivity.
The Sony a7 IV’s higher feature score reveals its superiority in various aspects. Although both cameras share common features, the Sony a7 IV offers additional capabilities and enhancements that contribute to its higher score. These enhancements provide users with a more versatile and advanced photography experience, enabling them to capture high-quality images in various conditions and settings.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II does not surpass the Sony a7 IV in any particular feature. However, it still provides a decent set of features that cater to a wide range of photography enthusiasts, from beginners to more experienced users. The Canon EOS M50 Mark II remains a reliable option for those who prioritize the brand or are already familiar with Canon’s ecosystem.
In comparing the two cameras, the Sony a7 IV proves to be the better choice due to its higher feature score and additional capabilities. Meanwhile, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II remains a viable option for those who prefer the Canon brand or seek a more affordable alternative. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on individual preferences, requirements, and budget constraints.
The Sony a7 IV outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in storage and battery, scoring 76 points compared to Canon’s 21. Both cameras accept SD memory cards, but the Sony a7 IV has two memory card slots and is also compatible with CFexpress Type A and UHS-II SD cards, offering more versatility in storage options. The Canon EOS M50 Mark II only has one memory card slot and is compatible with UHS-I SD cards.
The Sony a7 IV’s battery life is significantly longer, providing 580 shots compared to the Canon EOS M50 Mark II’s 305 shots. Additionally, the Sony a7 IV uses the NP-FZ100 battery and supports USB charging, making it more convenient for extended use. The Canon EOS M50 Mark II relies on the LP-E12 battery and does not support USB charging.
While the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has a lower score in this category, it still offers adequate storage and battery life for casual photographers or beginners. However, the Sony a7 IV’s superior storage options, longer battery life, and USB charging capability make it a better choice for professional photographers or those who require more flexibility and endurance in their camera equipment.
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS M50 Mark II or the Sony a7 IV:
