Canon EOS M6 Mark II vs Sony a6400 Comparison

The Sony a6400 emerges as the winner with a score of 70/100, while the Canon EOS M6 Mark II trails behind with 63/100. Both cameras share common specifications, such as being mirrorless and having a 2019 release year. The Canon EOS M6 Mark II is slightly cheaper at $850, compared to the Sony a6400 at $900. In terms of size and weight, the cameras are almost identical with minimal differences.

The Sony a6400 outperforms the Canon EOS M6 Mark II, which justifies its higher score. Although the Canon EOS M6 Mark II has a lower price, the Sony a6400 proves to be a better camera in terms of overall performance. Thus, the higher score of the Sony a6400 reflects its superior quality, making it a more desirable option for photographers.

Canon EOS M6 Mark II vs Sony a6400 Overview and Optics

The Sony a6400 outperforms the Canon EOS M6 Mark II in optics with a score of 68/100 compared to the Canon’s 62/100. Both cameras share common specifications, such as a CMOS sensor, APS-C sensor size, and the lack of image stabilization. Additionally, both cameras have their own lens mounts, with the Canon using the EF-M mount and the Sony using the E mount.

The Sony a6400 is superior in terms of its sensor, as evidenced by its DXOMARK score of 83, compared to the Canon’s 58. This higher score means the Sony a6400 provides better image quality, particularly in low light situations. Furthermore, the a6400’s processor, the Bionz X, is known for its fast processing speed and efficient noise reduction capabilities.

On the other hand, the Canon EOS M6 Mark II has its advantages, such as a higher megapixel count (33 vs. 24.2) and a faster shooting speed (14 vs. 11). These features make the Canon more suitable for capturing detailed images and fast action scenes.

In terms of optics, the Sony a6400 is the better choice due to its higher DXOMARK score and superior processing capabilities. However, the Canon EOS M6 Mark II may be more appealing to those who prioritize higher resolution and faster shooting speeds. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on the specific needs and preferences of the photographer.

The Canon EOS M6 Mark II and the Sony a6400 share an identical video score of 91/100, indicating that both cameras have impressive video capabilities. They have several common features, including a maximum video resolution of 4K, video dimensions of 3840 x 2160, a frame rate of 120fps, and built-in time-lapse functionality.

Despite the identical scores, the Canon EOS M6 Mark II offers certain advantages over the Sony a6400. Its compact size and lighter weight make it more portable and easier to handle, especially for vloggers and content creators who require a camera that is easy to carry around. Additionally, the M6 Mark II has a fully articulating touchscreen, allowing for more flexible shooting angles and easier framing of shots.

On the other hand, the Sony a6400 has its own set of advantages. It features a more advanced autofocus system, providing faster and more accurate focus during video recording. Furthermore, the a6400 has a longer battery life, which is beneficial for extended video shoots or when capturing time-lapse videos that require the camera to be operational for long periods.

Both the Canon EOS M6 Mark II and the Sony a6400 are strong contenders in the world of video-capable cameras. The M6 Mark II’s portability and articulating touchscreen make it an attractive option for vloggers and content creators, while the a6400’s advanced autofocus system and longer battery life cater to those who prioritize focus accuracy and extended shooting times. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on the specific needs and preferences of the user.

The Sony a6400 emerges as the winner with a feature score of 81/100, compared to the Canon EOS M6 Mark II’s score of 70/100. Both cameras share several common features, such as a 3-inch touchscreen, flip screen, WIFI, and Bluetooth capabilities. However, neither camera has GPS functionality.

The Sony a6400 outperforms the Canon EOS M6 Mark II in some aspects. Although both cameras have a 3-inch screen, the a6400 has a higher screen resolution of 921,600 dots, compared to the M6 Mark II’s 1,040,000 dots. This means that the a6400 provides a clearer and sharper display, which is beneficial when reviewing images or navigating menus.

The Canon EOS M6 Mark II still has some advantages over the Sony a6400. Its screen resolution is slightly higher, which may result in a better image quality when reviewing photos. However, this difference is not significant enough to outweigh the benefits of the Sony a6400’s higher overall feature score.

Taking all factors into consideration, the Sony a6400 is a better camera in terms of features. Its higher feature score and better screen resolution make it the preferred choice for photographers looking for a camera with advanced capabilities. While the Canon EOS M6 Mark II is still a good camera, the Sony a6400 offers more value and performance in this comparison.

The Sony a6400 outperforms the Canon EOS M6 Mark II in storage and battery, scoring 37/100 compared to 35/100. Both cameras have one memory card slot and offer USB charging. They accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards, but the Sony a6400 also supports Memory Stick Duo and UHS-I compatibility, while the Canon has UHS-II compatibility.

The Sony a6400 provides a longer battery life of 410 shots, compared to the Canon’s 305 shots. This advantage allows users to capture more images before needing to recharge or replace the battery. The Sony uses the NP-FW50 battery, while the Canon relies on the LP-E17 battery.

Although the Canon EOS M6 Mark II scores slightly lower in storage and battery, its UHS-II compatibility enables faster read and write speeds for memory cards, which can be beneficial for some users.

Considering both cameras’ storage and battery capabilities, the Sony a6400 holds a slight edge due to its longer battery life and additional memory card compatibility. However, the Canon EOS M6 Mark II’s UHS-II compatibility may be a deciding factor for those requiring faster memory card performance.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS M6 Mark II or the Sony a6400:

• Nikon Z50 vs Sony a6400
• Sony a6400 vs a6600
• Nikon Z30 vs Sony a6400
• Sony a6400 vs a7 II
• Fujifilm X-S10 vs Sony a6400
• Sony a6100 vs a6400