Canon EOS M6 Mark II vs Sony a6600 Comparison

The Sony a6600 comes out on top with a score of 75/100, while the Canon EOS M6 Mark II trails behind with 63/100. Both mirrorless cameras were announced on 08/28/2019 and released in the same year. They share similarities in size, with the Canon M6 Mark II measuring 120 x 70 x 49mm and the Sony a6600 at 120 x 67 x 69mm.

The winning Sony a6600 has a higher score due to its better features and performance. However, the Canon EOS M6 Mark II is lighter, weighing 408g compared to the Sony a6600’s 503g, making it more portable. The Canon also comes with a lower launch price of $850, compared to the Sony’s $1200, offering a more budget-friendly option.

Taking all these factors into account, the Sony a6600 is the better camera in terms of overall performance and features. However, the Canon EOS M6 Mark II remains a good option for those who prioritize portability and affordability.

Canon EOS M6 Mark II vs Sony a6600 Overview and Optics

The Sony a6600 outperforms the Canon EOS M6 Mark II in optics, scoring 76/100 compared to the latter’s 62/100. Both cameras share several common features, such as APS-C sensor size, CMOS sensor type, and lens mounts specific to their respective brands (Canon EF-M and Sony E).

The Sony a6600 excels with its higher DXOMARK sensor score of 82, which contributes to better image quality. Additionally, the a6600 boasts an image stabilization feature, ensuring sharp and steady photos even in challenging conditions. Although the Canon EOS M6 Mark II has a higher megapixel count of 33, the superior sensor quality and image stabilization of the Sony a6600 make it the better camera in terms of optics.

On the other hand, the Canon EOS M6 Mark II does have some advantages. Its shooting speed of 14 frames per second is faster than the Sony a6600’s 11 frames per second, offering better performance for action or sports photography. However, this advantage does not outweigh the overall superiority of the Sony a6600’s optics.

In comparing the Canon EOS M6 Mark II and the Sony a6600, the Sony a6600 emerges as the winner in optics. Its higher DXOMARK sensor score and the presence of image stabilization contribute to better image quality. While the Canon EOS M6 Mark II has a faster shooting speed, it is not enough to compensate for the shortcomings in its optics. Therefore, the Sony a6600 is the more reliable camera for photographers seeking optimal optical performance.

The Canon EOS M6 Mark II and the Sony a6600 both received a video score of 91/100, indicating their strong performance in this category. In terms of video capabilities, they share several key specifications, such as 4K maximum video resolution, 3840 x 2160 maximum video dimensions, and built-in time-lapse functionality.

The Canon EOS M6 Mark II edges ahead with its maximum video frame rate of 120fps, compared to the Sony a6600’s 100fps. This higher frame rate allows for smoother slow-motion footage and more flexibility in post-production. The difference in frame rates gives the Canon EOS M6 Mark II an advantage for videographers who prioritize capturing fast-moving subjects or creating dynamic slow-motion effects.

On the other hand, the Sony a6600 does not have any distinct advantages in video capabilities over the Canon EOS M6 Mark II, as they share most specifications. However, it matches the Canon EOS M6 Mark II in terms of video quality, resolution, and time-lapse functionality, making it a competitive option for videographers seeking a high-performance camera.

Comparing the video capabilities of the Canon EOS M6 Mark II and the Sony a6600, the Canon model offers a slight advantage due to its higher maximum video frame rate. However, both cameras deliver impressive video quality, resolution, and time-lapse features, making either choice suitable for versatile videography needs.

The Sony a6600 emerges as the winner in the features comparison, with a score of 81/100, while the Canon EOS M6 Mark II scores 70/100. Both cameras share several specifications, such as a 3-inch touchscreen, flip screen, and the absence of GPS. Additionally, they both have WIFI and Bluetooth connectivity.

The Sony a6600 outperforms the Canon EOS M6 Mark II in screen resolution, with 921,600 dots compared to the latter’s 1,040,000 dots. This higher resolution provides clearer and sharper images on the screen, resulting in a better user experience when composing, reviewing, and sharing photos.

Despite its lower score, the Canon EOS M6 Mark II does have one advantage over the Sony a6600 – its higher screen resolution. With 1,040,000 dots, it offers a slightly better display quality than the Sony a6600’s 921,600 dots. However, this difference may not be significant enough for most users to consider it a deciding factor in their purchase decision.

Taking into account these differences, the Sony a6600 proves to be the better camera in terms of features, with a higher overall score and superior screen resolution. The Canon EOS M6 Mark II, while having a higher screen resolution, falls short in other aspects and does not provide a significant advantage over the Sony a6600. As a result, potential buyers should consider the Sony a6600 for its superior features and performance.

The Sony a6600 outperforms the Canon EOS M6 Mark II in storage and battery, scoring 48 out of 100 compared to Canon’s 35. Both cameras have one memory card slot and support USB charging. They also accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards, with the Sony a6600 additionally supporting Memory Stick Pro Duo cards.

The Sony a6600 boasts a significantly longer battery life, offering 810 shots per charge, while the Canon EOS M6 Mark II provides 305 shots. This difference makes the a6600 more reliable for extended shooting sessions. The a6600 uses the NP-FZ100 battery type, whereas the M6 Mark II uses the LP-E17.

Although the Canon EOS M6 Mark II falls short in battery performance, it does have the advantage of being compatible with UHS-II SD cards, allowing for faster read and write speeds. This can be beneficial for photographers who require quicker data transfer.

Considering the storage and battery aspects, the Sony a6600 proves to be superior due to its extended battery life and additional memory card support. The Canon EOS M6 Mark II, while offering faster SD card compatibility, cannot match the a6600’s reliability in prolonged usage.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS M6 Mark II or the Sony a6600:

• Sony a6400 vs a6600
• Fujifilm X-T5 vs Sony a6600
• Sony a6600 vs a7C
• Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs EOS M6 Mark II
• Sony a6600 vs a7 III
• Canon EOS M6 Mark II vs Sony a7C