CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Canon EOS M6 Mark II vs Sony a7C Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Canon EOS M6 Mark II

canon eos m6 mark ii
63%

Sony a7C

sony a7c
Winner!
78%
Canon EOS M6 Mark II
vs
Sony a7C
Price
850
1799
Brand
Canon
Sony
Model
EOS M6 Mark II
a7C
Released
2019
2020
Announcement Date
28/08/2019
01/11/2020
Camera Type
Mirrorless
Mirrorless
Camera Size
120 x 70 x 49 mm
124 x 71 x 60 mm
Camera Weight
408
509
Compare

The Sony a7C outperforms the Canon EOS M6 Mark II with a score of 78/100 compared to 63/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and have similar dimensions, with the a7C being slightly larger and heavier. The Canon EOS M6 Mark II was released in 2019 at a lower price of $850, while the Sony a7C came out in 2020 with a launch price of $1799.

The Sony a7C’s higher score means it has better overall specifications. However, the Canon EOS M6 Mark II has its advantages, such as its lower price and lighter weight, making it more budget-friendly and portable.

Despite the Canon EOS M6 Mark II’s benefits, the Sony a7C still stands as the superior choice due to its enhanced features and performance. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the user’s preferences and needs.

Canon EOS M6 Mark II vs Sony a7C Overview and Optics

The Sony a7C is the winner in the optics comparison, scoring 80/100, while the Canon EOS M6 Mark II scores 62/100. Both cameras have CMOS sensors, similar shooting speeds (14 fps for Canon, 10 fps for Sony), and their respective lens mounts (Canon EF-M and Sony FE). However, the Sony a7C outperforms the Canon EOS M6 Mark II in several aspects.

The Sony a7C has a full-frame sensor, which provides better image quality and low-light performance compared to the Canon’s APS-C sensor. Additionally, the Sony camera has a higher DXOMARK score for the sensor (95) compared to the Canon (58), indicating superior image quality. The Sony a7C also features image stabilization, which helps reduce camera shake and improve image sharpness, while the Canon EOS M6 Mark II does not offer this feature.

On the other hand, the Canon EOS M6 Mark II has a higher megapixel count (33) compared to the Sony a7C (24.2), allowing for larger prints and more detailed images. The Canon camera also has a faster shooting speed (14 fps) compared to the Sony (10 fps), which can be beneficial for capturing fast-moving subjects.

Despite the advantages of the Canon EOS M6 Mark II, the Sony a7C’s superior sensor, image stabilization, and overall better optics make it the better choice for most photographers. The Canon EOS M6 Mark II may be more suitable for those who prioritize higher megapixel count and faster shooting speed.

Optics
Optics
62%
80%
Megapixels
33 MP
24.2 MP
Image Resolution
6960 x 4640 px
6000 x 4000 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
14.9 x 22.3 mm
23.8 x 35.6 mm
Sensor Format
APS-C
Full Frame
Frame Rate
14 fps
10 fps
Lens Mount
Canon EF-M
Sony FE
Image Processor
Digic 8
Bionz X
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Native)
25600
51200
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
100
50
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
51200
204800
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 4000 s
1/ 4000 s
Autofocus Points
143
693
In-body Stabilization
1
Viewfinder Type
Electronic
Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution
2360000 dots
2360000 dots

Canon EOS M6 Mark II vs Sony a7C Video Performance

The Canon EOS M6 Mark II outperforms the Sony a7C in video capabilities with a score of 91/100, compared to the Sony a7C’s 70/100. Both cameras share common video specifications, including 4K max video resolution and 3840 x 2160 max video dimensions. Additionally, both cameras have built-in time-lapse functionality.

The Canon EOS M6 Mark II surpasses the Sony a7C in terms of max video frame rate, offering an impressive 120fps, while the Sony a7C only reaches 30fps. This higher frame rate allows the Canon EOS M6 Mark II to capture smoother slow-motion footage and better overall video quality.

On the other hand, the Sony a7C does not possess any clear advantages over the Canon EOS M6 Mark II in video capabilities. Both cameras have the same video resolution, dimensions, and time-lapse functionality, with the Canon EOS M6 Mark II having an edge in max video frame rate. Therefore, no specific areas show the Sony a7C to be better than the Canon EOS M6 Mark II in this comparison.

Based on the comparison of their video capabilities, the Canon EOS M6 Mark II is the superior camera, offering a significantly higher max video frame rate. This advantage provides users with smoother and more detailed video capture, making it a better choice for those prioritizing video performance. The Sony a7C, while still a capable camera, does not excel in any particular aspect of video capabilities when compared to the Canon EOS M6 Mark II.

Video
Video
91%
70%
Video
1
1
Max Video Resolution
4K
4K
Max Video Dimensions
3840 x 2160 px
3840 x 2160 px
Max Video Frame Rate
120 p
30 p
Time-Lapse Built In
1
1
Video File Format
MPEG-4
XAVC S

Canon EOS M6 Mark II vs Sony a7C Features and Benefits

The Sony a7C is the winner in this comparison, scoring 81/100 in features, while the Canon EOS M6 Mark II scores 70/100. Both cameras have several common specifications, including a 3-inch touchscreen, flip screen, WIFI, Bluetooth, and no GPS.

The Sony a7C outperforms the Canon EOS M6 Mark II in several aspects. Although both cameras have a 3-inch screen, the Sony a7C has a higher screen resolution of 921,600 dots, compared to the Canon’s 1,040,000 dots. This difference results in a clearer and sharper display on the Sony a7C, providing better image preview and easier menu navigation. Additionally, the Sony a7C’s higher overall feature score signifies that it offers more advanced capabilities that may appeal to photographers who value versatility and performance.

On the other hand, the Canon EOS M6 Mark II is not without its advantages. Its screen resolution is only slightly lower than the Sony a7C’s, and it still provides a high-quality display. Furthermore, its lower feature score does not necessarily mean it is an inferior camera; it may simply lack some of the more advanced features found in the Sony a7C. For some users, these additional features may not be essential, making the Canon EOS M6 Mark II a suitable and more affordable option.

In comparing these two cameras, it is evident that the Sony a7C excels in terms of features and screen resolution, making it a better choice for those who prioritize advanced capabilities and a high-quality display. However, the Canon EOS M6 Mark II remains a competitive option for users who require a reliable camera with a slightly lower feature score and more budget-friendly pricing.

Features
Features
70%
81%
Built-in Flash
1
External Flash
1
1
GPS
Weather Sealing
1
Screen Type
LCD
LCD
Touch Screen
1
1
Screen Size
3
3
Screen Resolution
1040000 dots
921600 dots
Flip Screen
1
1
Live View
1
1
Wi-Fi
1
1
Bluetooth
1
1

Canon EOS M6 Mark II vs Sony a7C Storage and Battery

The Sony a7C outperforms the Canon EOS M6 Mark II in storage and battery, scoring 45/100 compared to the Canon’s 35/100. Both cameras possess a single memory card slot and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards, with UHS-II compatibility. Additionally, both offer USB charging capabilities.

The Sony a7C’s superior battery life sets it apart from the Canon EOS M6 Mark II, providing 740 shots per charge using its NP-FZ100 battery. In contrast, the Canon’s LP-E17 battery allows for only 305 shots per charge. This significant difference in battery life makes the Sony a7C a more reliable option for extended shooting sessions.

However, the Canon EOS M6 Mark II still holds its own in terms of storage compatibility and USB charging. Despite its lower battery life, it remains a viable option for photographers seeking a camera with those specific features.

Ultimately, the Sony a7C’s longer battery life grants it the advantage over the Canon EOS M6 Mark II in terms of storage and battery performance. While both cameras offer similar storage options and USB charging, the Sony a7C’s extended battery life makes it the better choice for individuals who prioritize longer shooting sessions.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
35%
45%
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible)
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible)
Dual Memory Card Slots
Battery Type
LP-E17
NP-FZ100
Battery Life
305 shots
740 shots
USB Charging
1
1
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Overall Score
58
95
Portrait (Color Depth)
N/A
25 bits
Landscape (Dynamic Range)
N/A
14.7 EVs
Sports (Low-Light ISO)
N/A
3407
Scores
Main Features
Extra Features
Construction and Durability
Handling and Ergonomics
Value for Money
Total Score

Canon EOS M6 Mark II vs Sony a7C – Our Verdict

Canon EOS M6 Mark II vs Sony a7C Comparison image.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS M6 Mark II or the Sony a7C:

User Scores
B&H photo video
1
1
amazon
Spotted a mistake with these specs? Please let us know so we can update it!