Canon EOS R vs Sony a6400 Comparison

The Canon EOS R outperforms the Sony a6400 with a score of 74/100 compared to the latter’s 70/100. Both cameras share similarities as mirrorless devices, launched in 2018 and 2019 respectively. The Canon EOS R, priced at $2300, boasts a larger size (136 x 98 x 84mm) and a heavier weight (485g) than the Sony a6400, which has a $900 price tag, measures 120 x 67 x 60mm, and weighs 403g.

The Canon EOS R’s higher score reflects its superior performance in terms of general specifications. However, the Sony a6400’s smaller size and lighter weight make it a more portable option for those seeking convenience. Price-wise, the Sony a6400 is more affordable, making it a viable choice for budget-conscious photographers.

Ultimately, the Canon EOS R’s better performance justifies its higher score, while the Sony a6400 offers a compact and budget-friendly alternative.

Canon EOS R vs Sony a6400 Overview and Optics

The Canon EOS R outperforms the Sony a6400 in optics with a score of 73/100, compared to the Sony’s 68/100. Both cameras share some common specifications such as a CMOS sensor, no image stabilisation, and a similar processor (Canon’s Digic 8 and Sony’s Bionz X).

The Canon EOS R boasts a higher megapixel count at 30.3, compared to the Sony a6400’s 24.2, resulting in more detailed and sharper images. Its full-frame sensor size also allows for better low-light performance and a wider dynamic range than the Sony’s APS-C sensor. The Canon EOS R also has a higher DXOMARK score for its sensor (89) compared to the Sony a6400 (83), indicating better overall image quality.

The Sony a6400, however, has a faster shooting speed of 11 frames per second (fps) compared to the Canon EOS R’s 8 fps. This makes the Sony a6400 more suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects and action photography. The Sony E lens mount also offers a wider range of affordable lens options compared to the Canon RF mount, which is a newer and more expensive system.

In terms of optics, the Canon EOS R delivers superior image quality due to its higher megapixel count, full-frame sensor, and better DXOMARK score. The Sony a6400 offers advantages in shooting speed and lens affordability, but falls short in overall image quality. Depending on one’s specific needs and priorities, both cameras present unique strengths in their optical performance.

The Sony a6400 outperforms the Canon EOS R in video capabilities, with a video score of 91/100 compared to the Canon’s 70/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as 4K max video resolution and 3840 x 2160 max video dimensions. Additionally, both cameras have built-in time-lapse functionality.

The Sony a6400 has a significant advantage over the Canon EOS R in terms of video frame rate, offering a max video frame rate of 120fps, while the Canon EOS R has a max video frame rate of 30fps. This means that the Sony a6400 can capture smoother and more detailed slow-motion footage, making it a better choice for videographers who prioritize high-quality video performance.

While the Canon EOS R falls short in terms of video frame rate, it still offers respectable video capabilities with its 4K resolution and built-in time-lapse functionality. However, it is not as versatile as the Sony a6400 for capturing fast-paced action or creating cinematic slow-motion effects.

Between the two cameras, the Sony a6400 is the clear winner in terms of video capabilities due to its higher video score and superior max video frame rate. The Canon EOS R, while still offering decent video performance, is not as strong a contender in this area. Videographers and content creators should consider the Sony a6400 for its better video capabilities, while those who prioritize other features may still find value in the Canon EOS R.

The Canon EOS R outperforms the Sony a6400 with a feature score of 87/100 compared to the Sony’s 81/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including touchscreen capabilities, flip screens, GPS, WIFI, and Bluetooth connectivity. However, the Canon EOS R excels in certain areas, making it the superior choice based on these features.

The Canon EOS R has a larger screen size at 3.2 inches compared to the Sony a6400’s 3 inches. This difference allows for easier navigation and a better viewing experience. Additionally, the Canon EOS R boasts a higher screen resolution of 2,100,000 dots, while the Sony a6400 has a resolution of only 921,600 dots. The higher resolution results in a clearer and more detailed image display.

Despite its lower score, the Sony a6400 has advantages as well. Both cameras lack GPS capabilities, but this may not be a significant drawback for many users. The Sony a6400 still offers a solid set of features, including touchscreen functionality, a flip screen, and wireless connectivity options.

Considering the differences in screen size and resolution, the Canon EOS R is the better choice for those prioritizing image display and ease of use. The Sony a6400, while not as advanced in these areas, remains a viable option for those seeking a camera with similar features at a potentially lower price point. Ultimately, the choice depends on individual preferences and priorities when selecting a camera.

The Sony a6400 wins the storage and battery category with a score of 37/100, while the Canon EOS R scores 35/100. Both cameras have one memory card slot and USB charging capabilities. They accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards, with the EOS R being UHS-II compatible and the a6400 being UHS-I compatible. Additionally, the a6400 accepts Memory Stick Duo cards.

The Sony a6400 outperforms the Canon EOS R in battery life, offering 410 shots per charge compared to the EOS R’s 370 shots. The a6400 uses the NP-FW50 battery, while the EOS R uses the LP-E6N battery. This advantage in battery life makes the Sony a6400 a more reliable option for extended shooting sessions.

The Canon EOS R, however, has the benefit of UHS-II compatibility, allowing for faster memory card performance. Despite its lower battery life, the EOS R may still appeal to those seeking quicker data transfer speeds.

Considering the storage and battery aspects, the Sony a6400 is the better choice due to its longer battery life. The Canon EOS R holds an advantage in memory card performance, but overall, the a6400’s superior battery life makes it the preferable option.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS R or the Sony a6400:

• Nikon Z50 vs Sony a6400
• Sony a6400 vs a6600
• Nikon Z30 vs Sony a6400
• Canon EOS R vs EOS R6
• Canon EOS R vs EOS R10
• Canon EOS R vs EOS R7