Canon EOS R vs Sony a7 II Comparison

The Canon EOS R outperforms the Sony a7 II with a score of 74/100 compared to 68/100. Both cameras are mirrorless, released in 2018 and 2014 respectively. They share similarities in size, with the Canon being slightly larger (136 x 98 x 84mm) than the Sony (127 x 96 x 60mm). However, the Canon is lighter, weighing 485g, while the Sony weighs 599g.

The Canon EOS R’s higher score signifies its superior quality, despite its higher launch price of $2300 compared to the Sony a7 II’s $1600. The Sony a7 II, though older and heavier, still offers decent performance at a more affordable price.

Ultimately, the Canon EOS R is a better camera with improved features, while the Sony a7 II remains a viable, budget-friendly option.

Canon EOS R vs Sony a7 II Overview and Optics

The Sony a7 II wins the optics comparison with a score of 78/100, while the Canon EOS R receives a score of 73/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a CMOS sensor, full-frame sensor size, and similar DXOMARK scores for their sensors (89 for Canon EOS R and 90 for Sony a7 II).

The Sony a7 II outperforms the Canon EOS R in terms of image stabilization, offering this feature while the Canon EOS R lacks it. This advantage allows the Sony a7 II to produce sharper images in various shooting conditions, especially in low light or when using longer focal lengths. Additionally, the Sony a7 II uses the Sony E lens mount, which provides access to a wide range of high-quality lenses.

On the other hand, the Canon EOS R has a higher megapixel count at 30.3 compared to the Sony a7 II’s 24.2, allowing for larger prints and more cropping flexibility. The Canon EOS R also boasts a faster shooting speed of 8 frames per second, compared to the Sony a7 II’s 5 frames per second, enabling better capture of fast-moving subjects. The Canon RF lens mount on the EOS R supports a growing range of high-quality lenses, specifically designed for the mirrorless system.

Despite the higher score of the Sony a7 II, the Canon EOS R holds its ground with more megapixels and faster shooting speed. However, the inclusion of image stabilization in the Sony a7 II gives it an edge in terms of overall optical performance. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on individual priorities and preferences in terms of image quality, stabilization, and lens selection.

The Canon EOS R outperforms the Sony a7 II in video capabilities, with a score of 70/100 compared to the Sony a7 II’s score of 56/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as having a maximum video frame rate of 30fps for the Canon EOS R and 60fps for the Sony a7 II.

The Canon EOS R is superior in several aspects. It boasts a maximum video resolution of 4K with dimensions of 3840 x 2160, which results in higher quality and more detailed footage. Additionally, the Canon EOS R has a built-in time-lapse functionality, allowing for creative and dynamic video content without the need for additional equipment.

On the other hand, the Sony a7 II has a maximum video resolution of Full HD with dimensions of 1920 x 1080. While this is still a decent resolution, it falls short when compared to the 4K capabilities of the Canon EOS R. Moreover, the Sony a7 II lacks built-in time-lapse functionality, which may limit its appeal to videographers and content creators.

Despite its lower score, the Sony a7 II does offer a higher maximum video frame rate of 60fps, which can provide smoother and more fluid footage, particularly for fast-paced scenes or slow-motion effects. This advantage, however, may not be enough to compensate for the overall lower video quality and lack of time-lapse functionality compared to the Canon EOS R.

Taking all these factors into account, the Canon EOS R emerges as the better choice for those prioritizing video capabilities. With its 4K resolution and built-in time-lapse functionality, it provides a more versatile and high-quality video experience than the Sony a7 II.

The Canon EOS R outperforms the Sony a7 II in features, scoring 87/100 compared to the Sony’s 57/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, including a flip screen, no GPS, and WIFI connectivity. However, the Canon EOS R excels in certain areas, making it the superior choice in terms of features.

The Canon EOS R has a larger screen size of 3.2 inches, compared to the Sony a7 II’s 3-inch screen. Additionally, its screen resolution is significantly higher at 2,100,000 dots, while the Sony a7 II has a resolution of 1,230,000 dots. The EOS R also has a touchscreen, which is absent in the a7 II. This allows for easier navigation through menus and faster adjustments to settings. Moreover, the Canon EOS R has Bluetooth connectivity, which the Sony a7 II lacks. This feature adds convenience when transferring files and controlling the camera remotely.

Despite its lower feature score, the Sony a7 II still has some advantages. For example, its flip screen is beneficial for shooting at different angles, especially when capturing images from challenging perspectives. Additionally, the WIFI connectivity enables easy sharing of images and remote control of the camera.

Based on these comparisons, the Canon EOS R is the better choice for those who prioritize features such as a larger screen, higher resolution, touchscreen capabilities, and Bluetooth connectivity. However, for users who may not require these advanced features, the Sony a7 II still offers a reliable option with its flip screen and WIFI connectivity. Ultimately, the decision depends on individual preferences and specific photography needs.

The Canon EOS R outperforms the Sony a7 II in storage and battery with a score of 35/100 to 21/100. Both cameras possess a single memory card slot and accept SD/SDHC/SDXC cards. However, the Canon EOS R is UHS-II compatible, while the Sony a7 II also supports Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo cards.

The Canon EOS R boasts a slightly longer battery life of 370 shots, compared to the Sony a7 II’s 350 shots. The EOS R uses an LP-E6N battery and offers USB charging, making it more convenient for on-the-go users. In contrast, the a7 II relies on an NP-FW50 battery and lacks USB charging capabilities.

Despite the lower score, the Sony a7 II provides additional memory card compatibility, which may appeal to users who already own Memory Stick Duo cards. However, the Canon EOS R’s better battery life and USB charging feature make it a more practical choice for photographers who prioritize power management and convenience.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS R or the Sony a7 II:

• Canon EOS R vs EOS R6
• Canon EOS R vs EOS R10
• Canon EOS R vs EOS R7
• Sony a6400 vs a7 II
• Canon EOS R vs Nikon Z5
• Sony a7 II vs a7 III