Canon EOS R10 vs Sony a7 II Comparison
Canon EOS R10
Sony a7 II
Price | |||
---|---|---|---|
Brand | Canon | Sony | |
Model | EOS R10 | a7 II | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2022 | 2014 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | May 24, 2022 | November 20, 2014 | |
Camera Type | |||
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Canon EOS R10 and Sony a7 II are close competitors. Both cameras are mirrorless and share some common features. However, the EOS R10, released in 2022, is newer and has a more affordable launch price of $980, while the a7 II was released in 2014 with a launch price of $1600.
The Canon EOS R10 stands out with its compact size, measuring 123 x 88 x 83mm, and lighter weight of 426g (0.94lbs). On the other hand, the Sony a7 II is slightly larger at 127 x 96 x 60mm and heavier, weighing 599g (1.32lbs).
Despite the Sony a7 II’s higher launch price and older release date, its score remains competitive with the EOS R10. This suggests that the a7 II may still offer valuable features and performance for certain users.
Taking into account the scores, size, weight, and launch prices, the Canon EOS R10 offers a more affordable and portable option, while the Sony a7 II remains a viable choice for those who prioritize specific features or have brand loyalty.
Canon EOS R10 vs Sony a7 II Overview and Optics
The Sony a7 II triumphs over the Canon EOS R10 in the optics category with a score of 78/100, compared to the R10’s 71/100. Both cameras share certain specifications, such as 24-megapixel CMOS sensors and lens mounts specific to their respective brands. However, there are key differences that contribute to the higher score for the Sony a7 II.
The Sony a7 II boasts a full-frame sensor, while the Canon EOS R10 has an APS-C sensor. This gives the a7 II a clear advantage in image quality, as full-frame sensors typically capture more detail and perform better in low light. Additionally, the Sony a7 II features image stabilization, which helps to reduce camera shake and produce sharper images. This is an important factor in the optics comparison, as the Canon EOS R10 lacks this feature.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS R10 has a faster shooting speed of 15 frames per second, compared to the Sony a7 II’s 5 frames per second. This makes the R10 better suited for capturing fast-moving subjects. Furthermore, the R10’s Digic X processor outperforms the Sony a7 II’s Bionz X processor, as evidenced by the higher DXOMARK score of 97 for the R10’s sensor.
Despite these advantages for the Canon EOS R10, the Sony a7 II’s full-frame sensor and image stabilization ultimately give it the edge in the optics category. The R10’s faster shooting speed and superior processor are not enough to overcome the significant benefits offered by the a7 II’s full-frame sensor and image stabilization. Therefore, the Sony a7 II is the better choice for those prioritizing optics quality.
Optics
|
Canon EOS R10
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 24 MP | 24.3 MP | |
---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 6000 x 4000 px | 6000 x 4000 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 22.2 x 14.8 mm | 23.9 x 35.8 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. | |||
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 15 fps | 5 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Canon RF | Sony E | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | Digic X | Bionz X | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. | |||
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 100 | 50 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 32,000 | 51,200 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 100 | 50 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 51200 | 51200 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 30 s | 30 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 4000 s | 1/ 8000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 651 | 117 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. | |||
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | Electronic | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 2,360,000 dots | 2,359,000 dots |
Canon EOS R10 vs Sony a7 II Video Performance
The Canon EOS R10 outperforms the Sony a7 II in video capabilities with a score of 91/100 compared to the Sony’s 56/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, but the Canon EOS R10 surpasses the Sony a7 II in several key areas.
One significant advantage of the Canon EOS R10 is its maximum video resolution of 4K, with dimensions of 3840 x 2160, while the Sony a7 II only offers Full HD resolution at 1920 x 1080. This difference in resolution means the Canon EOS R10 captures much more detail and provides a higher quality video output. Furthermore, the Canon EOS R10 boasts a maximum video frame rate of 120fps, double that of the Sony a7 II’s 60fps. This higher frame rate allows for smoother motion capture and improved slow-motion capabilities.
Another notable feature of the Canon EOS R10 is its built-in time-lapse functionality, which the Sony a7 II lacks. This feature enables users to create stunning time-lapse videos without the need for additional equipment or software.
While the Sony a7 II falls short in these areas, it is still a capable camera for video recording. Its Full HD resolution and 60fps frame rate are suitable for casual video recording and provide satisfactory results for most users. However, for those seeking higher quality video and more advanced features, the Canon EOS R10 is the clear winner.
Considering the significant difference in video scores, the Canon EOS R10 proves to be a superior choice for videographers and content creators, offering higher resolution, faster frame rates, and built-in time-lapse capabilities. Meanwhile, the Sony a7 II may be a suitable option for those with less demanding video requirements but still want a reliable camera for recording.
Video
|
Canon EOS R10
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. | |||
---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. | |||
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 3840 x 2160 px | 1920 x 1080 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 120 p | 60 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. | |||
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MPEG-4, MOV | XAVC S |
Canon EOS R10 vs Sony a7 II Features and Benefits
The Canon EOS R10 outperforms the Sony a7 II in features, scoring 70 out of 100 points compared to the Sony a7 II’s 57 points. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as a 3-inch screen size, flip screen, lack of GPS, and WIFI connectivity. However, there are key differences that set them apart.
The Canon EOS R10 has a touchscreen, which the Sony a7 II lacks. This makes the EOS R10 more user-friendly, as it allows for easier navigation and control. Additionally, the EOS R10 features Bluetooth connectivity, providing more options for wireless communication and remote control.
On the other hand, the Sony a7 II has a higher screen resolution at 1,230,000 dots compared to the EOS R10’s 1,040,000 dots. This results in a sharper and more detailed display on the Sony a7 II, which can be beneficial for previewing images and videos.
Despite the higher screen resolution of the Sony a7 II, the Canon EOS R10 still comes out ahead due to its touchscreen and Bluetooth capabilities. The added convenience and functionality provided by these features make the EOS R10 a more versatile and user-friendly option.
As for the Sony a7 II, its higher screen resolution is a notable advantage, but it falls short in other areas, such as lacking a touchscreen and Bluetooth connectivity. Although it is a solid camera, the Canon EOS R10 offers more features and a better overall experience for users.
Features
|
Canon EOS R10
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. | |||
---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. | |||
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. | |||
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. | |||
Screen Type | TFT LCD | LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. | |||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 1,040,000 dots | 1,230,000 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. | |||
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. | |||
Wi-Fi | |||
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. | |||
Canon EOS R10 vs Sony a7 II Storage and Battery
The Canon EOS R10 outperforms the Sony a7 II in storage and battery with a score of 40/100 compared to 35/100. Both cameras have one memory card slot and accept SD/SDHC/SDXC cards. However, the Sony a7 II also accommodates Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo cards.
The Canon EOS R10 has a superior battery life, providing 450 shots per charge, while the Sony a7 II offers 350 shots. The Canon uses an LP-E17 battery, and the Sony uses an NP-FW50 battery.
The Sony a7 II’s advantage is its compatibility with Memory Stick cards, offering flexibility in storage options. However, the Canon EOS R10’s longer battery life and USB charging capability make it the better choice for extended shooting sessions and convenient charging options.
Storage and Battery
|
Canon EOS R10
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro-HG Duo | |
---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots | |||
Battery Type | LP-E17 | NP-FW50 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 450 shots | 350 shots | |
USB Charging |
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Canon EOS R10
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
Overall Score DXOMARK overall sensor score. | N/A | ||
---|---|---|---|
Portrait (Color Depth) As described by DXOMARK 'The Portrait score in our camera sensor reviews defines color depth performance and its unit is a number of bits. A color depth of 22 bits is excellent; differences below 1 bit are barely noticeable.' | N/A | 24.9 bits | |
Landscape (Dynamic Range) As described by DXOMARK 'The Landscape score in our camera sensor tests defines the maximum dynamic range of the camera sensor and its unit is an exposure value (EV). A value of 12 EV is excellent with differences below 0.5 EV usually not noticeable.' | N/A | 13.6 EVs | |
Sports (Low-Light ISO) Described by DXOMARK as 'The maximal value of ISO sensitivity needed to reach a given value of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The greater the value, the better' | N/A | 2449 |
Scores
|
Canon EOS R10
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
Main Features | N/A | ||
---|---|---|---|
Extra Features | N/A | ||
Construction and Durability | N/A | ||
Handling and Ergonomics | N/A | ||
Value for Money | N/A | ||
Total Score | N/A |
Canon EOS R10 vs Sony a7 II – Our Verdict
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS R10 or the Sony a7 II:
User Scores
|
Canon EOS R10
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
B&H photo video | N/A |
---|