CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Canon EOS R5 vs EOS R6 Mark II Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Canon EOS R5

canon eos r5
Winner!
86%

Canon EOS R6 Mark II

Canon EOS R6 Mark II camera image
78%
Canon EOS R5
vs
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Price
Brand
Canon
Canon
Model
EOS R5
EOS R6 Mark II
Released
2020
2022
Announcement Date
July 30, 2020
February 11, 2022
Camera Type
Mirrorless
Mirrorless
Camera Size
Camera Weight

The Canon EOS R5 takes the lead with a score of 86/100, while the Canon EOS R6 Mark II trails behind at 78/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and share similar dimensions, with the R5 measuring 138 x 98 x 88mm and the R6 Mark II at 138.4 x 98.4 x 88.4mm.

Each camera has its strengths, with the R5 catering to professionals seeking top-notch performance, and the R6 Mark II offering a more accessible option for those just starting out or working with a tighter budget.

Canon EOS R5 vs EOS R6 Mark II Overview and Optics

The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in optics with a score of 88/100, compared to the R6 Mark II’s 83/100. Both cameras share several common specifications, including a CMOS sensor, Digic X processor, full-frame sensor size, Canon RF lens mount, and image stabilization.

The EOS R5’s superior optics can be attributed to its higher megapixel count of 45 and its DXOMARK sensor score of 95. These features enable the R5 to capture more detailed images and perform better in low light conditions. Its shooting speed of 20 is also sufficient for most photography needs, making it a versatile and high-quality camera.

On the other hand, the EOS R6 Mark II has a lower megapixel count at 24 and a DXOMARK sensor score of 91. However, it does excel in shooting speed, reaching 40, which is double that of the R5. This advantage makes the R6 Mark II a more suitable camera for sports or action photography, where capturing fast-moving subjects is crucial.

Regarding optics, the Canon EOS R5 is the better choice for photographers seeking higher image quality and better low light performance. Meanwhile, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II offers a faster shooting speed, catering to those who prioritize capturing high-speed action. Both cameras provide excellent features, but the choice ultimately depends on the specific needs and preferences of the photographer.

Optics
Optics
88%
83%
Megapixels
45 MP
24 MP
Image Resolution
8192 x 5464 px
6000 x 4000 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
23.9 x 35.9 mm
24 x 36 mm
Sensor Format
Full Frame
Full Frame
Frame Rate
20 fps
40 fps
Lens Mount
Canon RF
Canon RF
Image Processor
Digic X
Digic X
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Native)
51,200
102,400
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
100
50
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
102400
204800
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 8000 s
1/ 8000 s
Autofocus Points
1,053
4,897
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
Electronic
Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution
5,760,000 dots
3,690,000 dots

Canon EOS R5 vs EOS R6 Mark II Video Performance

The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in video capabilities, with a video score of 100/100 compared to the R6 Mark II’s 83/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as time-lapse functionality built in. However, the R5 surpasses the R6 Mark II in various aspects, making it the superior choice for videographers.

The EOS R5 excels with its 8K max video resolution and dimensions of 8192 x 4320, while the R6 Mark II offers only 4K resolution and 3840 x 2160 dimensions. This significant difference in resolution allows the R5 to produce much sharper and detailed footage. Additionally, the R5 boasts a higher max video frame rate of 120fps, compared to the R6 Mark II’s 60fps. This higher frame rate enables the R5 to capture smoother slow-motion video, providing more creative options for filmmakers.

The R6 Mark II, although inferior in video specifications, still offers decent video capabilities suitable for most casual users and some professionals. With its 4K resolution and 60fps frame rate, it can produce quality footage for various purposes. However, for those seeking higher resolution and frame rate options, the R5 remains the clear winner.

Given the significant difference in video scores and specifications, the Canon EOS R5 stands as the better camera for videographers. Its 8K resolution, larger dimensions, and higher frame rate provide superior video quality and creative options. While the R6 Mark II is capable of producing good-quality footage, it falls short in comparison to the exceptional capabilities of the R5.

Video
Video
100%
83%
Video
Max Video Resolution
8K
4K
Max Video Dimensions
8192 x 4320 px
3840 x 2160 px
Max Video Frame Rate
120 p
60 p
Time-Lapse Built In
Video File Format
MP4
MPEG-4, MOV

Canon EOS R5 vs EOS R6 Mark II Features and Benefits

The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II with a feature score of 87/100 compared to 72/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including touchscreen capabilities, flip screens, WIFI, and Bluetooth connectivity.

The R5 surpasses the R6 Mark II in screen size and resolution. With a 3.2-inch screen and a resolution of 2,100,000 dots, the R5 offers a more detailed and larger display for image review and composition. This advantage allows photographers to better assess their shots and make more informed decisions about settings and composition.

On the other hand, the R6 Mark II has a GPS feature, which the R5 lacks. This functionality enables users to geotag their images, making it easier to organize and locate photos based on the shooting location. This feature could be beneficial for photographers who travel or shoot in various locations and need to keep track of their images efficiently.

Despite the R6 Mark II’s GPS advantage, the R5’s superior screen size and resolution significantly contribute to its higher feature score. The larger and more detailed display enhances the user experience and provides valuable visual information for photographers. The R6 Mark II’s GPS feature, while useful, does not outweigh the benefits of the R5’s improved screen specifications.

Considering the features and specifications, the Canon EOS R5 emerges as the superior camera in this comparison. Its larger screen and higher resolution offer a more enjoyable and informative user experience, while the shared features like touchscreen, flip screen, WIFI, and Bluetooth connectivity maintain the convenience and functionality expected from modern cameras.

Features
Features
87%
72%
Built-in Flash
External Flash
GPS
Weather Sealing
Screen Type
LCD
TFT LCD
Touch Screen
Screen Size
3.2"
3"
Screen Resolution
2,100,000 dots
1,620,000 dots
Flip Screen
Live View
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth

Canon R5 vs R6 Mark II Storage and Battery

The Canon R5 and R6 Mark II both score 68/100 in storage and battery. These cameras share several specifications, including two memory card slots, compatibility with SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) memory cards, the use of LP-E6NH batteries, and USB charging capability.

The EOS R5 has an advantage in storage options, accepting CFexpress cards in addition to SD/SDHC/SDXC cards. This allows for faster and higher capacity storage, which can be beneficial for photographers with demanding workflows.

On the other hand, the EOS R6 Mark II has a slightly better battery life, providing 360 shots per charge compared to the EOS R5’s 320 shots. This may be an important factor for photographers who require longer shooting sessions without frequently changing batteries.

Taking these factors into account, the EOS R5 offers better storage capabilities, while the EOS R6 Mark II has a marginally longer battery life. Ultimately, the choice between these cameras will depend on the specific needs and priorities of the photographer.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
68%
68%
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible), CFexpress
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible)
Dual Memory Card Slots
Battery Type
LP-E6NH
LP-E6NH
Battery Life
320 shots
360 shots
USB Charging
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Overall Score
95%
N/A
Portrait (Color Depth)
25.3 bits
N/A
Landscape (Dynamic Range)
14.6 EVs
N/A
Sports (Low-Light ISO)
3042
N/A
Scores
Main Features
96%
N/A
Extra Features
92%
N/A
Construction and Durability
100%
N/A
Handling and Ergonomics
100%
N/A
Value for Money
85%
N/A
Total Score
94%
N/A

Canon R5 vs R6 Mark II Alternatives

Canon R5 vs R6 Mark II comparison image

Still not ready to make a decision? Check out our other popular camera comparisons for inspiration:

User Scores
B&H photo video
Spotted a mistake with these specs? Please let us know so we can update it!