If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything).
Prices last updated on .
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything).
Prices last updated on .
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
The Canon EOS R5 takes the lead with a score of 86/100, while the Canon EOS R6 Mark II trails behind at 78/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and share similar dimensions, with the R5 measuring 138 x 98 x 88mm and the R6 Mark II at 138.4 x 98.4 x 88.4mm.
Each camera has its strengths, with the R5 catering to professionals seeking top-notch performance, and the R6 Mark II offering a more accessible option for those just starting out or working with a tighter budget.
Canon EOS R5 vs EOS R6 Mark II Overview and Optics
The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in optics with a score of 88/100, compared to the R6 Mark II’s 83/100. Both cameras share several common specifications, including a CMOS sensor, Digic X processor, full-frame sensor size, Canon RF lens mount, and image stabilization.
The EOS R5’s superior optics can be attributed to its higher megapixel count of 45 and its DXOMARK sensor score of 95. These features enable the R5 to capture more detailed images and perform better in low light conditions. Its shooting speed of 20 is also sufficient for most photography needs, making it a versatile and high-quality camera.
On the other hand, the EOS R6 Mark II has a lower megapixel count at 24 and a DXOMARK sensor score of 91. However, it does excel in shooting speed, reaching 40, which is double that of the R5. This advantage makes the R6 Mark II a more suitable camera for sports or action photography, where capturing fast-moving subjects is crucial.
Regarding optics, the Canon EOS R5 is the better choice for photographers seeking higher image quality and better low light performance. Meanwhile, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II offers a faster shooting speed, catering to those who prioritize capturing high-speed action. Both cameras provide excellent features, but the choice ultimately depends on the specific needs and preferences of the photographer.
Optics
Canon EOS R5
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Megapixels
45 MP
24 MP
Image Resolution
8192 x 5464 px
6000 x 4000 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
23.9 x 35.9 mm
24 x 36 mm
Sensor Format
Full Frame
Full Frame
Frame Rate
20 fps
40 fps
Lens Mount
Canon RF
Canon RF
Image Processor
Digic X
Digic X
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Native)
51,200
102,400
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
100
50
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
102400
204800
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 8000 s
1/ 8000 s
Autofocus Points
1,053
4,897
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
Electronic
Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution
5,760,000 dots
3,690,000 dots
Canon EOS R5 vs EOS R6 Mark II Video Performance
The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in video capabilities, with a video score of 100/100 compared to the R6 Mark II’s 83/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as time-lapse functionality built in. However, the R5 surpasses the R6 Mark II in various aspects, making it the superior choice for videographers.
The EOS R5 excels with its 8K max video resolution and dimensions of 8192 x 4320, while the R6 Mark II offers only 4K resolution and 3840 x 2160 dimensions. This significant difference in resolution allows the R5 to produce much sharper and detailed footage. Additionally, the R5 boasts a higher max video frame rate of 120fps, compared to the R6 Mark II’s 60fps. This higher frame rate enables the R5 to capture smoother slow-motion video, providing more creative options for filmmakers.
The R6 Mark II, although inferior in video specifications, still offers decent video capabilities suitable for most casual users and some professionals. With its 4K resolution and 60fps frame rate, it can produce quality footage for various purposes. However, for those seeking higher resolution and frame rate options, the R5 remains the clear winner.
Given the significant difference in video scores and specifications, the Canon EOS R5 stands as the better camera for videographers. Its 8K resolution, larger dimensions, and higher frame rate provide superior video quality and creative options. While the R6 Mark II is capable of producing good-quality footage, it falls short in comparison to the exceptional capabilities of the R5.
Video
Canon EOS R5
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Video
Max Video Resolution
8K
4K
Max Video Dimensions
8192 x 4320 px
3840 x 2160 px
Max Video Frame Rate
120 p
60 p
Time-Lapse Built In
Video File Format
MP4
MPEG-4, MOV
Canon EOS R5 vs EOS R6 Mark II Features and Benefits
The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II with a feature score of 87/100 compared to 72/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including touchscreen capabilities, flip screens, WIFI, and Bluetooth connectivity.
The R5 surpasses the R6 Mark II in screen size and resolution. With a 3.2-inch screen and a resolution of 2,100,000 dots, the R5 offers a more detailed and larger display for image review and composition. This advantage allows photographers to better assess their shots and make more informed decisions about settings and composition.
On the other hand, the R6 Mark II has a GPS feature, which the R5 lacks. This functionality enables users to geotag their images, making it easier to organize and locate photos based on the shooting location. This feature could be beneficial for photographers who travel or shoot in various locations and need to keep track of their images efficiently.
Despite the R6 Mark II’s GPS advantage, the R5’s superior screen size and resolution significantly contribute to its higher feature score. The larger and more detailed display enhances the user experience and provides valuable visual information for photographers. The R6 Mark II’s GPS feature, while useful, does not outweigh the benefits of the R5’s improved screen specifications.
Considering the features and specifications, the Canon EOS R5 emerges as the superior camera in this comparison. Its larger screen and higher resolution offer a more enjoyable and informative user experience, while the shared features like touchscreen, flip screen, WIFI, and Bluetooth connectivity maintain the convenience and functionality expected from modern cameras.
Features
Canon EOS R5
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Built-in Flash
External Flash
GPS
Weather Sealing
Screen Type
LCD
TFT LCD
Touch Screen
Screen Size
3.2"
3"
Screen Resolution
2,100,000 dots
1,620,000 dots
Flip Screen
Live View
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Canon R5 vs R6 Mark II Storage and Battery
The Canon R5 and R6 Mark II both score 68/100 in storage and battery. These cameras share several specifications, including two memory card slots, compatibility with SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) memory cards, the use of LP-E6NH batteries, and USB charging capability.
The EOS R5 has an advantage in storage options, accepting CFexpress cards in addition to SD/SDHC/SDXC cards. This allows for faster and higher capacity storage, which can be beneficial for photographers with demanding workflows.
On the other hand, the EOS R6 Mark II has a slightly better battery life, providing 360 shots per charge compared to the EOS R5’s 320 shots. This may be an important factor for photographers who require longer shooting sessions without frequently changing batteries.
Taking these factors into account, the EOS R5 offers better storage capabilities, while the EOS R6 Mark II has a marginally longer battery life. Ultimately, the choice between these cameras will depend on the specific needs and priorities of the photographer.
If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything).
Prices last updated on .
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything).
Prices last updated on .
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.