CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Canon EOS R5 vs Sony a7R III Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Canon EOS R5

canon eos r5
Winner!
86%

Sony a7R III

sony a7r iii
83%
Canon EOS R5
vs
Sony a7R III
Price
Brand
Canon
Sony
Model
EOS R5
a7R III
Released
2020
2017
Announcement Date
July 30, 2020
October 25, 2017
Camera Type
Mirrorless
Mirrorless
Camera Size
Camera Weight

The Canon EOS R5 takes the lead with a score of 86/100, while the Sony a7R III follows closely with a score of 83/100. Both are mirrorless cameras with similar sizes and weights, with the Canon EOS R5 measuring 138 x 98 x 88mm and weighing 680g, and the Sony a7R III measuring 127 x 96 x 74mm and weighing 657g.

The Canon EOS R5, released in 2020, has the advantage of being a more recent model, offering a higher launch price of $4499 compared to the Sony a7R III’s $3200, which was released in 2017. This price difference reflects the improved technology and features found in the Canon EOS R5.

On the other hand, the Sony a7R III is slightly smaller and lighter, making it more convenient for photographers who prioritize portability. However, the Canon EOS R5’s higher score means it offers better overall performance and features, making it the superior choice for those willing to invest in a more advanced camera.

Canon EOS R5 vs Sony a7R III Overview and Optics

The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Sony a7R III in optics, scoring 88/100 compared to Sony’s 84/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as a CMOS sensor, full-frame sensor size, and image stabilization. They also have similar megapixel counts, with the Canon EOS R5 having 45 megapixels and the Sony a7R III having 42.4 megapixels.

The Canon EOS R5’s higher score is due to its faster shooting speed and advanced processor. It has a shooting speed of 20, which is double that of the Sony a7R III’s 10. This means the Canon EOS R5 can capture images more quickly, allowing for better action shots and faster response times. The EOS R5 also has a more advanced DIGIC X processor, which contributes to improved image quality, faster processing, and better performance.

On the other hand, the Sony a7R III has a higher DXOMARK score for its sensor, scoring 100 compared to the Canon EOS R5’s 95. This means the Sony a7R III’s sensor is capable of capturing higher quality images in terms of dynamic range, color depth, and low-light performance. Additionally, both cameras have different lens mounts, with the Canon EOS R5 using the Canon RF mount and the Sony a7R III using the Sony FE mount. This difference may be a deciding factor for those who already own lenses compatible with one of the mounts.

Considering the Canon EOS R5’s faster shooting speed and advanced processor, it is the superior camera in terms of optics. However, the Sony a7R III’s higher DXOMARK score and different lens mount might make it a more suitable choice for some photographers, depending on their needs and existing equipment.

Optics
Optics
88%
84%
Megapixels
45 MP
42.4 MP
Image Resolution
8192 x 5464 px
7952 x 5304 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
23.9 x 35.9 mm
24 x 35.9 mm
Sensor Format
Full Frame
Full Frame
Frame Rate
20 fps
10 fps
Lens Mount
Canon RF
Sony FE
Image Processor
Digic X
Bionz X
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Native)
51,200
32,000
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
100
50
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
102400
102400
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 8000 s
1/ 8000 s
Autofocus Points
1,053
425
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
Electronic
Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution
5,760,000 dots
3,686,400 dots

Canon EOS R5 vs Sony a7R III Video Performance

The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Sony a7R III in video capabilities, with a score of 100/100 compared to the Sony a7R III’s 56/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as having 4K video resolution, but the Canon EOS R5 takes the lead with its higher maximum video resolution of 8K, larger video dimensions of 8192 x 4320, and a faster maximum video frame rate of 120fps.

The Canon EOS R5’s 8K video resolution offers four times the detail of the Sony a7R III’s 4K resolution, resulting in significantly sharper and more detailed footage. Its maximum video frame rate of 120fps allows for smoother slow-motion footage, giving filmmakers more creative options. Additionally, the Canon EOS R5 features built-in time-lapse functionality, making it more versatile for capturing time-lapse videos without needing additional equipment.

The Sony a7R III, while falling short in comparison to the Canon EOS R5, still offers a respectable 4K video resolution and a maximum video frame rate of 30fps. Although it lacks built-in time-lapse functionality, it can still capture time-lapse videos with external equipment. Despite its lower score, the Sony a7R III remains a solid option for those who do not require the advanced video features of the Canon EOS R5.

Given the significant difference in video capabilities, the Canon EOS R5 emerges as the clear winner in this comparison. Its superior video resolution, frame rate, and built-in time-lapse functionality make it an ideal choice for filmmakers and content creators seeking top-of-the-line video performance. The Sony a7R III, while not as impressive in this aspect, remains a viable option for those with less demanding video requirements.

Video
Video
100%
56%
Video
Max Video Resolution
8K
4K
Max Video Dimensions
8192 x 4320 px
3840 x 2160 px
Max Video Frame Rate
120 p
30 p
Time-Lapse Built In
Video File Format
MP4
XAVC S, AVCHD Ver. 2.0, MP4

Canon EOS R5 vs Sony a7R III Features and Benefits

The Canon EOS R5 comes out on top with a feature score of 87/100, while the Sony a7R III trails slightly behind with a score of 83/100. Both cameras share several key features, such as touchscreen capability, flip screens, and a lack of built-in GPS. Additionally, both cameras come equipped with WIFI and Bluetooth connectivity.

The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Sony a7R III in terms of screen size and resolution. The R5 has a larger screen at 3.2 inches compared to the a7R III’s 3-inch screen. Furthermore, the R5 boasts a higher screen resolution of 2,100,000 dots, while the a7R III has a resolution of 1,440,000 dots. These differences contribute to the R5’s superior display and overall user experience.

Though the Sony a7R III does not surpass the Canon EOS R5 in any particular feature, it is important to note that it is still a high-quality camera. With a feature score of 83/100, the a7R III showcases a competitive and comparable set of features to the R5, making it a viable option for photographers who may prefer the Sony brand or have existing Sony equipment.

Considering the differences between the Canon EOS R5 and the Sony a7R III, the R5 takes the lead due to its larger screen size and higher resolution. However, the Sony a7R III remains a strong contender in the market, offering a solid set of features that closely rival those of the R5. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras will depend on personal preferences and brand loyalty.

Features
Features
87%
83%
Built-in Flash
External Flash
GPS
Weather Sealing
Screen Type
LCD
LCD
Touch Screen
Screen Size
3.2"
3"
Screen Resolution
2,100,000 dots
1,440,000 dots
Flip Screen
Live View
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth

Canon EOS R5 vs Sony a7R III Storage and Battery

The Canon EOS R5 wins the storage and battery comparison with a score of 68/100, while the Sony a7R III scores 65/100. Both cameras have two memory card slots and accept SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) cards. The EOS R5, however, also accepts CFexpress cards, providing faster transfer speeds and larger storage capacities.

The Sony a7R III has the advantage in battery life, offering 650 shots per charge, compared to the EOS R5’s 320 shots. However, the Canon EOS R5 uses the LP-E6NH battery type and offers USB charging, which the a7R III lacks with its NP-FZ100 battery.

Considering these factors, the Canon EOS R5 has superior storage capabilities due to its CFexpress compatibility, but the Sony a7R III has a longer battery life. USB charging in the EOS R5 provides added convenience for users. Despite the slight scoring difference, both cameras offer reliable storage and battery performance suitable for various photography needs.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
68%
65%
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible), CFexpress
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible)
Dual Memory Card Slots
Battery Type
LP-E6NH
NP-FZ100
Battery Life
320 shots
650 shots
USB Charging
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Overall Score
95%
100%
Portrait (Color Depth)
25.3 bits
26 bits
Landscape (Dynamic Range)
14.6 EVs
14.7 EVs
Sports (Low-Light ISO)
3042
3523
Scores
Main Features
96%
N/A
Extra Features
92%
N/A
Construction and Durability
100%
N/A
Handling and Ergonomics
100%
N/A
Value for Money
85%
N/A
Total Score
94%
N/A

Canon EOS R5 vs Sony a7R III Alternatives

Still not sure which camera is best for you? Check out some more popular camera comparisons for inspiration:

User Scores
Spotted a mistake with these specs? Please let us know so we can update it!