Canon EOS R5 vs Fujifilm X-H2 Comparison
Canon EOS R5
Fujifilm X-H2
Price |
from
Check Price
|
from
Check Price
| |
|---|---|---|---|
Brand | Canon | Fujifilm | |
Model | EOS R5 | X-H2 | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2020 | 2022 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | July 30, 2020 | May 31, 2022 | |
Camera Type |  Mirrorless | Mirrorless | |
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Fujifilm X-H2 with a score of 86/100 compared to 82/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were released in 2020 and 2022, respectively. They share similar dimensions, with the R5 measuring 138 x 98 x 88mm and the X-H2 at 136 x 93 x 95mm. Additionally, they have comparable weights, with the R5 at 680g and the X-H2 at 660g.
The EOS R5’s higher score reflects its superior performance, which justifies its higher launch price of $4499 compared to the X-H2’s $1999. However, the Fujifilm X-H2 still offers great value for its price point, making it a more budget-friendly option.
Taking these factors into account, the Canon EOS R5 is the better camera for those seeking top-notch performance, while the Fujifilm X-H2 is a more affordable alternative without sacrificing too much quality.
Canon EOS R5 vs Fujifilm X-H2 Overview and Optics
The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Fujifilm X-H2 in optics, with a score difference of 7 points (88/100 vs 81/100). Both cameras share some specifications, including a CMOS sensor, image stabilization, and a similar processor (Canon’s Digic X and Fujifilm’s X-Processor 5).
The Canon EOS R5 excels in several areas. It has a higher megapixel count (45 vs 40), allowing for more detailed images. Its shooting speed is also faster at 20 frames per second, compared to the Fujifilm X-H2’s 15. The EOS R5’s sensor is full-frame, providing a larger surface area for light capture and potentially better image quality. Additionally, its DXOMARK score for the sensor is 95, although it is worth noting that DXOMARK does not score Fujifilm cameras. The Canon RF lens mount allows for a wide range of high-quality lenses.
The Fujifilm X-H2 has some advantages as well. Its APS-C sensor size makes it more compact and lightweight than the full-frame EOS R5. This can be beneficial for photographers who prioritize portability. The Fujifilm X lens mount offers a variety of lenses tailored for the APS-C sensor, ensuring optimal performance.
In comparing the optics of these two cameras, the Canon EOS R5 stands out as the superior choice due to its higher megapixel count, faster shooting speed, and full-frame sensor. However, the Fujifilm X-H2 remains a strong contender for those seeking a more compact and portable camera system.
|
Optics
|
Canon EOS R5
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 45 MP | 40 MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 8192 x 5464 px | 7728 x 5152 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 23.9 x 35.9 mm | 23.5 x 15.6 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |  Full Frame |  APS-C | |
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 20 fps | 15 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Canon RF | Fujifilm X | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | Digic X | X-Processor 5 | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |  3:2 | 3:2 | |
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 100 | 125 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 51,200 | 12,800 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 100 | 80 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 102400 | 51200 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 30 s | 30 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 8000 s | 1/ 8000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 1,053 | 425 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |   | | |
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | Electronic | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 5,760,000 dots | 5,760,000 dots |
Canon EOS R5 vs Fujifilm X-H2 Video Performance
The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Fujifilm X-H2 in video capabilities, scoring 100/100 compared to the X-H2’s 83/100. Both cameras share some common features, such as built-in time-lapse functionality, which allows users to create stunning time-lapse videos with ease.
The Canon EOS R5 surpasses the Fujifilm X-H2 in terms of maximum video resolution and frame rate. The R5 has a remarkable 8K resolution (8192 x 4320), providing incredibly detailed and sharp video footage. In addition, the R5 boasts a maximum video frame rate of 120fps, allowing for smooth slow-motion capture and more creative possibilities in post-production.
On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-H2 has a maximum video resolution of 4K (3840 x 2160), which is still a respectable resolution for most video shooting needs. However, its maximum video frame rate is limited to 60fps, making it less versatile when it comes to capturing fast-paced action or achieving slow-motion effects.
While the Fujifilm X-H2 may not match the Canon EOS R5 in terms of video capabilities, it still offers solid performance for videographers who do not require the highest resolution or frame rate. For some users, the X-H2’s 4K resolution and 60fps frame rate may be more than sufficient for their needs, making it a viable option at a potentially lower price point.
Ultimately, the Canon EOS R5 stands out as the superior option for video capabilities, offering unparalleled resolution and frame rate performance. However, the Fujifilm X-H2 remains a strong contender for those who prioritize other features or have a limited budget.
|
Video
|
Canon EOS R5
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |  8K |  4K | |
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 8192 x 4320 px | 3840 x 2160 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 120 p | 60 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |  | | |
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MP4 | MPEG-4, MOV |
Canon EOS R5 vs Fujifilm X-H2 Features and Benefits
The Canon EOS R5 wins in the features category with a score of 87 out of 100, compared to the Fujifilm X-H2’s score of 85. Both cameras share several common specifications, including a touchscreen, flip screen, absence of GPS, and the presence of WIFI and Bluetooth capabilities.
The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Fujifilm X-H2 in terms of screen size and resolution. The R5 has a larger screen at 3.2 inches, compared to the X-H2’s 3-inch screen. Additionally, the R5 has a higher screen resolution at 2,100,000 dots, while the X-H2 has 1,620,000 dots. These differences contribute to the R5’s higher feature score and provide users with a better viewing experience for composing and reviewing images.
On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-H2 does not have any significant advantages over the Canon EOS R5 in the features category. Both cameras share the same essential specifications, and the differences in screen size and resolution are not enough to give the X-H2 an edge over the R5.
Considering the points mentioned, the Canon EOS R5 is the superior camera in terms of features. Its larger screen size and higher screen resolution provide users with a better experience when composing and reviewing images. While the Fujifilm X-H2 does not have any significant advantages over the R5, it still offers a competitive set of features that make it a viable option for photographers. However, based on the scores and specifications, the Canon EOS R5 is the better choice for those prioritizing features in their camera selection.
|
Features
|
Canon EOS R5
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |   | | |
|---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |  | | |
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |  | | |
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |  | | |
Screen Type | LCD | TFT LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |  | | |
Screen Size |  3.2" |  3" | |
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 2,100,000 dots | 1,620,000 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |  | | |
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |  | | |
Wi-Fi |  | | |
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |  | | |
Canon EOS R5 vs Fujifilm X-H2 Storage and Battery
The Fujifilm X-H2 outperforms the Canon EOS R5 in storage and battery with a score of 79/100, compared to the R5’s 68/100. Both cameras share common specifications, including two memory card slots and USB charging compatibility. They also accept UHS-II compatible SD cards, with the R5 additionally supporting SDHC and SDXC cards, and the X-H2 using CFexpress Type B cards.
The Fujifilm X-H2 excels in battery life, providing 680 shots per charge with its NP-W235 battery, while the Canon EOS R5 offers 320 shots using the LP-E6NH battery. This makes the X-H2 more suitable for extended shooting sessions without needing to change batteries frequently.
The Canon EOS R5, despite its lower score, benefits from accepting a wider range of memory card formats (SD, SDHC, and SDXC). This can be advantageous for photographers who have multiple card types in their collection.
Considering these factors, the Fujifilm X-H2 is the superior choice for storage and battery performance, while the Canon EOS R5 provides more flexibility in memory card compatibility.
|
Storage and Battery
|
Canon EOS R5
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible), CFexpress | CFexpress Type B, SD (UHS-II Compatible) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots |  | | |
Battery Type | LP-E6NH | NP-W235 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 320 shots | 680 shots | |
USB Charging |  | |
|
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Canon EOS R5
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
|
Overall Score DXOMARK overall sensor score. | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Portrait (Color Depth) As described by DXOMARK 'The Portrait score in our camera sensor reviews defines color depth performance and its unit is a number of bits. A color depth of 22 bits is excellent; differences below 1 bit are barely noticeable.' | 25.3 bits | N/A | |
Landscape (Dynamic Range) As described by DXOMARK 'The Landscape score in our camera sensor tests defines the maximum dynamic range of the camera sensor and its unit is an exposure value (EV). A value of 12 EV is excellent with differences below 0.5 EV usually not noticeable.' | 14.6 EVs | N/A | |
Sports (Low-Light ISO) Described by DXOMARK as 'The maximal value of ISO sensitivity needed to reach a given value of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The greater the value, the better' | 3042 | N/A |
|
Scores
|
Canon EOS R5
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
|
Main Features | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Extra Features | N/A | ||
Construction and Durability | N/A | ||
Handling and Ergonomics | N/A | ||
Value for Money | N/A | ||
Total Score | N/A |
Alternatives to the Canon EOS R5 and Fujifilm X-H2
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS R5 or the Fujifilm X-H2:
|
User Scores
|
Canon EOS R5
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
|
B&H photo video | N/A |
|---|