Canon EOS R50 vs Fujifilm X-S10 Comparison

The Canon EOS R50 edges out the Fujifilm X-S10 by just one point, scoring 70/100 compared to the X-S10’s 69/100. Both cameras are mirrorless, released in 2023 and 2020 respectively. They share similarities in size, with the EOS R50 measuring 116 x 86 x 69mm and the X-S10 at 126 x 85 x 65mm.

The EOS R50 outperforms the X-S10 with its lighter weight of 375g, making it easier to carry around. Additionally, it has a lower launch price of $679, making it more affordable than the X-S10’s $999.

On the other hand, the X-S10 has a slight advantage in compactness, being slightly smaller in width and depth. However, this difference is minimal and may not be significant to most users.

Taking into account the similar scores, affordability, and lighter weight of the EOS R50, it is the better choice for most users. The X-S10’s minor advantage in size does not outweigh the benefits of the EOS R50.

Canon EOS R50 vs Fujifilm X-S10 Overview and Optics

The Canon EOS R50 outperforms the Fujifilm X-S10 in optics with a score of 73/100, while the Fujifilm X-S10 scores 72/100. Both cameras share common specifications, including a CMOS sensor, APS-C sensor size, and similar megapixel count (24 for the Canon and 26 for the Fujifilm). Additionally, both cameras have their respective lens mounts: Canon RF for the EOS R50 and Fujifilm X for the X-S10.

The Canon EOS R50 has a DXOMARK score of 94 for its sensor, indicating superior image quality. Its Digic X processor contributes to faster image processing, which can be beneficial for high-speed photography. The Canon EOS R50’s lens mount compatibility with the Canon RF lenses also provides access to a wide range of high-quality lenses.

On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-S10 has a higher shooting speed of 20 frames per second, compared to the Canon EOS R50’s 12 frames per second. This makes the Fujifilm X-S10 more suitable for capturing fast-paced action. Moreover, the Fujifilm X-S10 has built-in image stabilization, which helps reduce camera shake and blur, especially in low-light conditions or while using longer focal length lenses.

The Fujifilm X-S10’s higher shooting speed and image stabilization features make it a strong contender in the optics department. However, the Canon EOS R50’s superior sensor quality and lens compatibility give it an edge. Despite their close scores, the Canon EOS R50 takes the lead due to its better sensor performance and lens selection. Both cameras offer impressive optical capabilities, but the Canon EOS R50 emerges as the winner in this comparison.

The Canon EOS R50 and the Fujifilm X-S10 both receive a video score of 91/100, making them equal contenders in terms of video capabilities. Both cameras feature 4K video resolution and built-in time-lapse functionality, ensuring high-quality video recordings and creative options for users.

Despite having the same video score, the Fujifilm X-S10 offers higher maximum video dimensions at 4096 x 2160, compared to the Canon EOS R50’s 3840 x 2160. This provides slightly more detail in the X-S10’s video output. Additionally, the X-S10 has a significantly faster maximum video frame rate, reaching 240fps, while the EOS R50 only achieves 120fps. This higher frame rate allows the X-S10 to capture smoother slow-motion footage, giving it an edge in video recording versatility.

On the other hand, the Canon EOS R50 still maintains its strong video performance, matching the Fujifilm X-S10 in overall video score. While it may not offer the same level of detail or slow-motion capabilities as the X-S10, it is still a reliable camera for capturing high-quality video content.

Both the Canon EOS R50 and Fujifilm X-S10 are solid choices for video recording, with their equal video scores reflecting their strong capabilities. The Fujifilm X-S10 has the advantage in terms of maximum video dimensions and frame rate, making it better for capturing detailed and slow-motion footage. However, the Canon EOS R50 remains a dependable option for those seeking a camera with excellent video performance. Ultimately, the choice between the two cameras will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user.

The Canon EOS R50 emerges as the winner in the features comparison with a score of 72/100, while the Fujifilm X-S10 trails closely behind at 70/100. Both cameras share several features, including a 3-inch screen, touchscreen functionality, flip screen, lack of GPS, and Bluetooth connectivity.

The Canon EOS R50 excels in screen resolution, boasting 1,620,000 dots, significantly higher than the Fujifilm X-S10’s 1,040,000 dots. This difference results in a sharper and clearer display on the EOS R50, enhancing the user experience when reviewing images or navigating menus. Furthermore, the EOS R50 has Wi-Fi connectivity, enabling photographers to transfer images wirelessly and control the camera remotely through a compatible smartphone or tablet.

On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-S10 does not offer Wi-Fi connectivity, which may be a disadvantage for some users who value the convenience of wireless image transfer and remote camera control. However, it is worth noting that the Fujifilm X-S10 still performs well in other shared features, such as screen size, touchscreen, flip screen, and Bluetooth connectivity.

Taking these factors into account, the Canon EOS R50’s superior screen resolution and Wi-Fi connectivity give it a slight edge over the Fujifilm X-S10 in terms of features. While the Fujifilm X-S10 is a strong competitor, the Canon EOS R50 ultimately outshines it in this comparison, providing a more comprehensive and user-friendly experience.

The Canon EOS R50 and Fujifilm X-S10 both score 35/100 in storage and battery performance. They share common specifications, including one memory card slot, compatibility with SD/SDHC/SDXC memory cards, and USB charging capabilities.

The EOS R50 holds an advantage with its support for UHS-II memory cards, enabling faster read and write speeds. Additionally, its battery life allows for 370 shots per charge, surpassing the X-S10’s 325 shots. The R50 uses an LP-E17 battery, contributing to its longer battery life.

On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-S10 supports only UHS-I memory cards, which offer slower speeds compared to UHS-II. Its NP-126S battery provides slightly less battery life than the EOS R50. However, it still delivers a respectable 325 shots per charge.

Both cameras perform similarly in terms of storage and battery, with the EOS R50 slightly outperforming the X-S10 due to its UHS-II support and marginally longer battery life. The X-S10 remains a competitive option, especially if the differences in memory card speed and battery life are not crucial factors for the user.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS R50 or the Fujifilm X-S10:

• Canon EOS R10 vs EOS R50
• Canon EOS R50 vs Nikon Z50
• Fujifilm X-S10 vs Sony a6400
• Canon EOS R50 vs Sony a6400
• Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs EOS R50
• Canon EOS R50 vs EOS R8