Canon EOS R50 vs Sony a6500 Comparison

The Sony a6500 edges out the Canon EOS R50 with a score of 72/100 compared to the latter’s 70/100. Both cameras share similarities as mirrorless models with compact designs. The Canon EOS R50 measures 116 x 86 x 69mm and weighs 375g, while the Sony a6500 is slightly larger at 120 x 67 x 53mm but heavier at 453g.

The Canon EOS R50 has its advantages, such as being lighter and more affordable with a launch price of $679. On the other hand, the Sony a6500, despite its higher launch price of $1400, offers better overall performance, earning it a higher score. This difference in scores reflects the quality each camera brings to the table.

Considering these factors, the Sony a6500 proves to be a better camera choice, while the Canon EOS R50 may be more suitable for budget-conscious buyers who value a lighter camera.

Canon EOS R50 vs Sony a6500 Overview and Optics

The Sony a6500 narrowly wins over the Canon EOS R50 in terms of optics, with a score of 74/100 compared to the R50’s 73/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including 24-megapixel CMOS sensors, APS-C sensor sizes, and similar shooting speeds (12 for the R50 and 11 for the a6500).

The Canon EOS R50 has a few advantages, such as its Digic X processor and higher DXOMARK score of 94 for its sensor. The R50 also features a Canon RF lens mount, which allows compatibility with Canon’s extensive range of RF lenses. These features contribute to the camera’s overall performance and image quality.

On the other hand, the Sony a6500 has a slightly higher megapixel count of 24.2 and features built-in image stabilization, which is absent in the R50. This makes it easier to capture sharp, blur-free images, particularly in low-light situations or when using longer focal lengths. The a6500 also utilizes a Sony E lens mount, providing access to a wide variety of compatible lenses from both Sony and third-party manufacturers.

While both cameras offer excellent optics, the Sony a6500 edges out the Canon EOS R50 due to its image stabilization and slightly higher megapixel count. However, the R50’s better processor and higher DXOMARK score should not be overlooked, as these factors also contribute to its overall performance. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras will depend on individual preferences and priorities, such as the importance of image stabilization and the desired lens ecosystem.

The Canon EOS R50 outperforms the Sony a6500 in video capabilities, scoring 91/100 compared to the Sony a6500’s 77/100. Both cameras share common specifications, such as 4K maximum video resolution, 3840 x 2160 video dimensions, and a maximum video frame rate of 120fps. Despite these similarities, the Canon EOS R50 offers superior video performance.

One key advantage of the Canon EOS R50 is its built-in time-lapse functionality. This feature allows users to create stunning time-lapse videos without requiring additional equipment or software. The Sony a6500, on the other hand, lacks this built-in feature, making it less convenient for time-lapse enthusiasts.

The Sony a6500, despite having a lower overall video score, may still have some advantages in specific scenarios. For example, it may perform better in low-light conditions or offer a more extensive selection of video settings. However, these potential benefits do not outweigh the advantages provided by the Canon EOS R50.

The Canon EOS R50 is the clear winner when it comes to video capabilities. Its higher score of 91/100 reflects its superior performance, particularly due to the built-in time-lapse functionality. While the Sony a6500 shares some common specifications, it falls short in overall video performance with a score of 77/100. Consequently, those seeking a camera with excellent video capabilities should opt for the Canon EOS R50.

The Sony a6500 emerges as the winner in the features comparison, scoring 81 out of 100 points, while the Canon EOS R50 scores 72 out of 100 points. Both cameras share several features in common, including a 3-inch touchscreen, flip screen, WiFi, and Bluetooth connectivity. Neither camera has GPS functionality.

The Sony a6500 excels with its higher feature score, primarily due to its screen resolution of 921,600 dots, which is significantly higher than the Canon EOS R50’s 1,620,000 dots. This difference in resolution provides the Sony a6500 with a sharper and clearer display, enhancing the user’s experience when composing shots, reviewing images, and navigating menus.

On the other hand, the Canon EOS R50 still has some advantages, although they are not enough to surpass the Sony a6500’s overall feature score. The touchscreen and flip screen functionalities are equally present in both cameras, providing flexibility and convenience for various shooting situations. Additionally, the Canon EOS R50 has WiFi and Bluetooth capabilities, allowing for seamless image transfer and remote control options.

In comparing the Canon EOS R50 and Sony a6500, it is evident that the Sony a6500 is the superior camera in terms of features. With a higher feature score and a significantly better screen resolution, the Sony a6500 provides an enhanced user experience. However, the Canon EOS R50 still offers valuable features such as the touchscreen, flip screen, and wireless connectivity options, ensuring it remains a viable choice for photographers.

The Canon EOS R50 triumphs over the Sony a6500 in storage and battery with a score of 35/100 compared to the Sony’s 21/100. Both cameras share a single memory card slot and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards. However, the Sony a6500 also supports Memory Stick Pro Duo cards, offering an additional storage option.

The Canon EOS R50 excels in battery life, providing 370 shots per charge with its LP-E17 battery, while the Sony a6500 manages 350 shots with its NP-FW50 battery. Additionally, the Canon EOS R50 allows USB charging, making it more convenient for on-the-go charging.

On the other hand, the Sony a6500 has a slight advantage in storage compatibility due to its support for Memory Stick Pro Duo cards. However, this advantage is not enough to compensate for its weaker battery performance.

Considering the longer battery life and USB charging capability, the Canon EOS R50 proves to be the better choice in terms of storage and battery performance. Despite the Sony a6500’s additional storage compatibility, its limitations in battery life and charging options make it less desirable in comparison.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS R50 or the Sony a6500:

• Canon EOS R10 vs EOS R50
• Canon EOS R50 vs Nikon Z50
• Canon EOS R50 vs Sony a6400
• Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs EOS R50
• Canon EOS R50 vs EOS R8
• Sony a6400 vs a6500