Canon EOS R50 vs Sony a7 II Comparison
Canon EOS R50
Sony a7 II
Price | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Brand | Canon | Sony | |
Model | EOS R8 | a7 II | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2023 | 2014 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | February 08, 2023 | November 20, 2014 | |
Camera Type |  Mirrorless | Mirrorless | |
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Canon EOS R50 outperforms the Sony a7 II with a score of 70/100 compared to 69/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and share similar dimensions, but the Canon is significantly lighter at 375g, while the Sony weighs 599g. The Canon EOS R50, released in 2023, is a newer model with a lower launch price of $679, whereas the Sony a7 II was released in 2014 with a launch price of $1600.
The Canon EOS R50’s higher score and lighter weight make it a more appealing option. Its lower price also adds to its attractiveness. However, the Sony a7 II’s slightly larger size might be an advantage for some users who prefer a more substantial grip. Despite the differences, both cameras are solid options for mirrorless camera enthusiasts. Ultimately, the Canon EOS R50’s higher score, lighter weight, and lower price make it the winner in this comparison.
Canon EOS R50 vs Sony a7 II Overview and Optics
The Sony a7 II takes the lead in our optics comparison with a score of 78/100, while the Canon EOS R50 trails behind with a score of 73/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as having 24-megapixel CMOS sensors and using their respective brand’s lens mounts, Canon RF for the EOS R50 and Sony E for the a7 II.
The Sony a7 II outperforms the Canon EOS R50 in several aspects. Firstly, the a7 II boasts a full-frame sensor, providing a larger sensor area and better low-light performance compared to the EOS R50’s APS-C sensor. Secondly, the a7 II features built-in image stabilization, which helps to reduce camera shake and produce sharper images, a feature the EOS R50 lacks.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS R50 shows superiority in terms of shooting speed, capturing 12 frames per second compared to the a7 II’s 5 frames per second. This makes the EOS R50 more suitable for fast-paced action photography. Additionally, the EOS R50 has a higher DXOMARK sensor score of 94, suggesting better overall image quality compared to the a7 II’s score of 90.
Taking these factors into account, the Sony a7 II stands out as the better option for photographers seeking a full-frame sensor and image stabilization. However, the Canon EOS R50 proves to be a strong contender for those who require faster shooting speeds and prioritize overall image quality. Both cameras have their unique strengths, and the final choice depends on the specific needs and preferences of the photographer.
|
Optics
|
Canon EOS R50
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 24 MP | 24.3 MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 6000 x 4000 px | 6000 x 4000 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 22.3 x 14.9 mm | 23.9 x 35.8 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |  APS-C |  Full Frame | |
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 12 fps | 5 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Canon RF | Sony E | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | Digic X | Bionz X | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |  3:2 | 3:2 | |
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 100 | 50 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 32,000 | 51,200 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 100 | 50 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 51200 | 51200 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 30 s | 30 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 4000 s | 1/ 8000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 651 | 117 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |   |  | |
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | Electronic | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 2,360,000 dots | 2,359,000 dots |
Canon EOS R50 vs Sony a7 II Video Performance
The Canon EOS R50 outperforms the Sony a7 II in video capabilities with a score of 91/100 compared to the Sony’s 56/100. Both cameras share some video specifications, but the Canon EOS R50 has distinct advantages that set it apart from the Sony a7 II.
Common features between the two cameras include the ability to record video and adjust settings for optimal video quality. However, the Canon EOS R50 surpasses the Sony a7 II with its maximum video resolution of 4K (3840 x 2160) compared to the Sony’s Full HD (1920 x 1080) resolution. This higher resolution allows the Canon EOS R50 to capture more detailed and visually appealing videos.
Another advantage of the Canon EOS R50 is its higher maximum video frame rate of 120fps, double the Sony a7 II’s 60fps. This higher frame rate enables the Canon EOS R50 to record smoother, more professional-looking videos, particularly in slow-motion sequences.
The Canon EOS R50 also offers built-in time-lapse functionality, a feature absent in the Sony a7 II. This function enables users to create stunning time-lapse videos without the need for additional software or equipment.
Despite its lower score, the Sony a7 II remains a solid choice for casual video users who do not require the advanced features offered by the Canon EOS R50. Its Full HD resolution and 60fps frame rate are sufficient for everyday video recording needs.
When comparing the Canon EOS R50 and the Sony a7 II, it is clear that the Canon EOS R50 offers superior video capabilities. Its higher resolution, faster frame rate, and built-in time-lapse functionality make it the better choice for serious videographers and content creators. However, the Sony a7 II remains a viable option for casual users who prioritize simplicity and affordability over advanced video features.
|
Video
|
Canon EOS R50
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |  4K |  Full HD | |
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 3840 x 2160 px | 1920 x 1080 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 120 p | 60 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |  | | |
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MP4, H.264, H.265 | XAVC S |
Canon EOS R50 vs Sony a7 II Features and Benefits
The Canon EOS R50 outperforms the Sony a7 II in features, scoring 72 out of 100 points, compared to the Sony a7 II’s 57 points. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as a 3-inch screen size, flip screens, no GPS, and WIFI connectivity.
The Canon EOS R50 surpasses the Sony a7 II in terms of screen resolution, touchscreen capabilities, and Bluetooth connectivity. The EOS R50 has a screen resolution of 1,620,000 dots, while the a7 II has a lower resolution of 1,230,000 dots. This difference results in a sharper and clearer display on the EOS R50. Additionally, the EOS R50 features a touchscreen, making it more user-friendly and intuitive to navigate. The a7 II lacks this feature. Furthermore, the EOS R50 includes Bluetooth connectivity, allowing for seamless pairing with compatible devices, whereas the a7 II does not offer Bluetooth.
On the other hand, the Sony a7 II does not have any significant advantages over the Canon EOS R50 in features. Both cameras have flip screens, no GPS, and WIFI connectivity. The only difference is the lack of touchscreen and Bluetooth in the a7 II, making it slightly less convenient to use and less versatile when connecting to other devices.
Considering the higher feature score and the additional advantages of the Canon EOS R50, it is the better camera in terms of features. The touchscreen and Bluetooth capabilities, along with a higher screen resolution, make the EOS R50 a more user-friendly and versatile camera. In contrast, the Sony a7 II falls short in these areas, making it less appealing for those seeking advanced features in a camera.
|
Features
|
Canon EOS R50
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |  | | |
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |  | | |
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |  | | |
Screen Type | LCD | LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |  | | |
Screen Size |  3" | 3" | |
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 1,620,000 dots | 1,230,000 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |  | | |
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |  | | |
Wi-Fi |  | | |
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |  | | |
Canon EOS R50 vs Sony a7 II Storage and Battery
The Canon EOS R50 and Sony a7 II are head to head in storage and battery. Both cameras have one memory card slot and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards. The Canon camera also supports UHS-I and II, while the Sony camera accommodates Memory Stick Duo, Pro Duo, and Pro-HG Duo cards.
The EOS R50 has a battery life of 370 shots, which is slightly better than the a7 II’s 350 shots. The Canon uses an LP-E17 battery type, while the Sony uses an NP-FW50 battery.
The Sony a7 IIs compatibility with Memory Stick cards may be beneficial for users who prefer these storage formats. However, the Canon EOS R50 offers better battery life and the convenience of USB charging.
|
Storage and Battery
|
Canon EOS R50
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I and II compatible) | SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro-HG Duo | |
|---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots |  | | |
Battery Type | LP-E17 | NP-FW50 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 370 shots | 350 shots | |
USB Charging |  | |
|
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Canon EOS R50
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
Overall Score DXOMARK overall sensor score. | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Portrait (Color Depth) As described by DXOMARK 'The Portrait score in our camera sensor reviews defines color depth performance and its unit is a number of bits. A color depth of 22 bits is excellent; differences below 1 bit are barely noticeable.' | N/A | 24.9 bits | |
Landscape (Dynamic Range) As described by DXOMARK 'The Landscape score in our camera sensor tests defines the maximum dynamic range of the camera sensor and its unit is an exposure value (EV). A value of 12 EV is excellent with differences below 0.5 EV usually not noticeable.' | N/A | 13.6 EVs | |
Sports (Low-Light ISO) Described by DXOMARK as 'The maximal value of ISO sensitivity needed to reach a given value of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The greater the value, the better' | N/A | 2449 |
|
Scores
|
Canon EOS R50
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
Main Features | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Extra Features | N/A | ||
Construction and Durability | N/A | ||
Handling and Ergonomics | N/A | ||
Value for Money | N/A | ||
Total Score | N/A |
Canon EOS R50 vs Sony a7 II – Our Verdict
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS R50 or the Sony a7 II:
|
User Scores
|
Canon EOS R50
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
B&H photo video | N/A |
|---|