CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs EOS RP Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Canon EOS R6 Mark II

Canon EOS R6 Mark II camera image
Winner!
78%

Canon EOS RP

canon eos rp
65%
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
vs
Canon EOS RP
Price
Brand
Canon
Canon
Model
EOS R6 Mark II
EOS RP
Released
2022
2019
Announcement Date
February 11, 2022
February 14, 2019
Camera Type
Mirrorless
Mirrorless
Camera Size
Camera Weight

The Canon EOS R6 Mark II emerges as the winner with a score of 78/100, while the Canon EOS RP scores 65/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were announced in February, with the R6 Mark II in 2022 and the EOS RP in 2019. They share similar sizes, with the R6 Mark II measuring 138.4 x 98.4 x 88.4mm and the EOS RP at 133 x 85 x 70mm.

The R6 Mark II outperforms the EOS RP due to its higher score, which is reflected in its better features. However, the EOS RP has its advantages, such as being lighter, weighing only 440g compared to the R6 Mark II’s 588g. This makes the EOS RP more portable and easier to handle.

Despite the weight advantage of the EOS RP, the R6 Mark II is a superior camera, justifying its higher price of $2499 compared to the EOS RP’s $1300. As a result, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II is the clear winner for those seeking better performance and features, while the Canon EOS RP offers a more budget-friendly option with decent capabilities.

Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs EOS RP Overview and Optics

The Canon EOS R6 Mark II outperforms the Canon EOS RP in optics with a score of 83/100 compared to the RP’s 67/100. Both cameras share common specifications such as a CMOS sensor, Full Frame sensor size, and Canon RF lens mount. However, the differences in their scores reveal the R6 Mark II’s superiority in certain aspects.

The R6 Mark II has a higher shooting speed of 40, compared to the RP’s 5, making it more suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects. The R6 Mark II also boasts a more advanced Digic X processor, which results in faster image processing and better overall image quality. Furthermore, the R6 Mark II has a higher DXOMARK score of 91 for its sensor, indicating better sensor performance than the RP’s 85. One of the most notable advantages of the R6 Mark II is its built-in image stabilization, which the RP lacks. This feature reduces the risk of blurry images due to camera shake.

On the other hand, the Canon EOS RP has a slight edge in megapixels, offering 26 compared to the R6 Mark II’s 24. This difference may be beneficial for photographers who require larger, more detailed images.

Taking all of these factors into account, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II is the clear winner in terms of optics, providing a faster shooting speed, superior sensor performance, and image stabilization. The Canon EOS RP, however, may still be suitable for those who prioritize higher megapixel count. Ultimately, the choice between these cameras will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the photographer.

Optics
Optics
83%
67%
Megapixels
24 MP
26 MP
Image Resolution
6000 x 4000 px
6240 x 4160 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
24 x 36 mm
24 x 35.9 mm
Sensor Format
Full Frame
Full Frame
Frame Rate
40 fps
5 fps
Lens Mount
Canon RF
Canon RF
Image Processor
Digic X
Digic 8
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Native)
102,400
40,000
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
50
100
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
204800
102400
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 8000 s
1/ 4000 s
Autofocus Points
4,897
4,779
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
Electronic
Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution
3,690,000 dots
2,360,000 dots

Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs EOS RP Video Performance

The Canon EOS R6 Mark II outperforms the Canon EOS RP in video capabilities, with a video score of 83/100 compared to the RP’s 70/100. Both cameras share some common video specifications, such as 4K maximum video resolution and 3840 x 2160 maximum video dimensions. Additionally, both cameras offer built-in time-lapse functionality.

The R6 Mark II’s superior video performance can be attributed to its higher maximum video frame rate of 60fps, compared to the RP’s 25fps. This higher frame rate allows the R6 Mark II to capture smoother, more lifelike video, especially when recording fast-moving subjects or action scenes. The R6 Mark II’s faster frame rate also provides greater flexibility in post-production, such as creating slow-motion footage.

While the EOS RP falls short in frame rate, it still offers solid video performance with its 4K resolution and built-in time-lapse functionality. For users who do not require higher frame rates for their projects, the RP remains a viable option, especially considering its lower price point compared to the R6 Mark II.

Taking into account the video specifications and performance of both cameras, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II is the clear winner in this comparison. Its higher video score and faster frame rate make it a more versatile and powerful tool for capturing high-quality video. However, the Canon EOS RP still holds its ground as a capable camera for those who do not need the additional frame rate capabilities and are looking to save on cost.

Video
Video
83%
70%
Video
Max Video Resolution
4K
4K
Max Video Dimensions
3840 x 2160 px
3840 x 2160 px
Max Video Frame Rate
60 p
25 p
Time-Lapse Built In
Video File Format
MPEG-4, MOV
MP4

Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs EOS RP Features and Benefits

The Canon EOS R6 Mark II comes out as the winner with a feature score of 72/100, while the Canon EOS RP has a slightly lower score of 70/100. Both cameras share some similar specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, touchscreen capability, flip screen, WiFi, and Bluetooth connectivity.

The R6 Mark II surpasses the RP with a higher screen resolution of 1,620,000 dots compared to the RP’s 1,040,000 dots, providing a sharper and more detailed display. Additionally, the R6 Mark II has GPS functionality, which the RP lacks. This feature enables users to tag their photos with location data, making it easier to organize and categorize images.

On the other hand, the Canon EOS RP has its own advantages despite the lower feature score. It is important to consider other factors such as price, size, and weight when comparing cameras. The EOS RP might be a more suitable option for those looking for a more affordable and lightweight camera. However, it is crucial to evaluate the importance of the differences in features for one’s specific needs.

In comparing the Canon EOS R6 Mark II and the Canon EOS RP, the R6 Mark II proves to be the superior camera in terms of features. Its higher screen resolution and GPS capability give it an edge over the RP. However, the EOS RP remains a viable option for those prioritizing affordability and weight. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on individual preferences and requirements.

Features
Features
72%
70%
Built-in Flash
External Flash
GPS
Weather Sealing
Screen Type
TFT LCD
LCD
Touch Screen
Screen Size
3"
3"
Screen Resolution
1,620,000 dots
1,040,000 dots
Flip Screen
Live View
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth

Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs EOS RP Storage and Battery

The Canon EOS R6 Mark II outperforms the Canon EOS RP in storage and battery with a score of 68/100, a significant 39-point difference compared to the RP’s 29/100. Both cameras accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards and are UHS-II compatible. They also share the convenient feature of USB charging.

The R6 Mark II surpasses the RP with two memory card slots, doubling the storage capacity and offering more flexibility. Additionally, the R6 Mark II has a longer battery life of 360 shots, which is 110 shots more than the RP’s 250 shots. The R6 Mark II uses the LP-E6NH battery type, contributing to its extended battery life.

The EOS RP, while inferior in storage and battery, still offers decent performance with its single memory card slot and 250-shot battery life. Its LP-E17 battery type provides sufficient power for casual photography sessions.

Given these factors, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II is the superior choice for those who prioritize storage capacity and battery life. The Canon EOS RP remains a viable option for casual photographers who do not require extensive storage or battery capabilities.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
68%
29%
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible)
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible)
Dual Memory Card Slots
Battery Type
LP-E6NH
LP-E17
Battery Life
360 shots
250 shots
USB Charging
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Overall Score
N/A
85%
Portrait (Color Depth)
N/A
24.3 bits
Landscape (Dynamic Range)
N/A
11.9 EVs
Sports (Low-Light ISO)
N/A
2978
Scores
Main Features
N/A
80%
Extra Features
N/A
64%
Construction and Durability
N/A
80%
Handling and Ergonomics
N/A
67%
Value for Money
N/A
80%
Total Score
N/A
74%

Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs EOS RP – Our Verdict

Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs EOS RP Comparison image.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS R6 Mark II or the Canon EOS RP:

User Scores
B&H photo video
Spotted a mistake with these specs? Please let us know so we can update it!