Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Fujifilm X-T5 Comparison
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Fujifilm X-T5
Price |
from
Check Price
|
from
Check Price
| |
---|---|---|---|
Brand | Canon | Fujifilm | |
Model | EOS R6 Mark II | X-T5 | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2022 | 2022 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | February 11, 2022 | February 11, 2022 | |
Camera Type | |||
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Fujifilm X-T5 outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II with a score of 81/100 compared to 78/100. Both cameras are mirrorless, announced on 02/11/2022, and released in 2022. They share similarities in their general specifications; however, there are noticeable differences that set them apart.
The Fujifilm X-T5 is better in terms of price, costing $1699, and is lighter at 557g. Additionally, its compact design measures 130 x 91 x 64mm, making it easier to carry around. On the other hand, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II has a higher launch price of $2499 and weighs slightly more at 588g. Its dimensions are 138.4 x 98.4 x 88.4mm, making it bulkier than the X-T5.
Despite the higher price and weight, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II might offer advantages in other areas, such as optics or performance. However, considering the general specifications, the Fujifilm X-T5 is the more affordable and portable option.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Fujifilm X-T5 Overview and Optics
The Canon EOS R6 Mark II wins the optics comparison with a score of 83/100, while the Fujifilm X-T5 scores 81/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, including a CMOS sensor, image stabilization, and a similar shooting speed, with the Canon at 40 and the Fujifilm at 15.
The Canon EOS R6 Mark II takes the lead with its full-frame sensor size, superior Digic X processor, and a DXOMARK score of 91 for its sensor. The full-frame sensor allows for better image quality and low-light performance compared to the Fujifilm X-T5’s APS-C sensor. Additionally, the Canon RF lens mount provides access to a wide range of high-quality lenses.
On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-T5 boasts a higher megapixel count of 40, compared to the Canon’s 24 megapixels. This advantage allows for more detailed images and better cropping flexibility. However, it is important to note that DXOMARK does not score Fujifilm cameras, so a direct comparison of sensor quality is not possible.
Though the Canon EOS R6 Mark II outperforms the Fujifilm X-T5 in terms of sensor size and processor, the Fujifilm X-T5 still has its merits with a higher megapixel count. Ultimately, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II’s full-frame sensor and superior processor make it the better choice for those prioritizing image quality and low-light performance. However, the Fujifilm X-T5 remains a strong contender for photographers seeking higher resolution images and the unique Fujifilm X lens lineup.
Optics
|
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
|
Fujifilm X-T5
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 24 MP | 40 MP | |
---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 6000 x 4000 px | 7728 x 5152 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 24 x 36 mm | 15.6 x 23.5 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. | |||
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 40 fps | 15 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Canon RF | Fujifilm X | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | Digic X | X-Processor 5 | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. | |||
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 100 | 125 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 102,400 | 12,800 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 50 | 64 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 204800 | 51200 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 30 s | 15 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 8000 s | 1/ 8000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 4,897 | 425 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. | |||
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | Electronic | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 3,690,000 dots | 3,690,000 dots |
Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Fujifilm X-T5 Video Performance
The Fujifilm X-T5 outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in video capabilities with a score of 87/100 compared to Canon’s 83/100. Both cameras share common features such as a maximum video frame rate of 60fps and built-in time-lapse functionality.
The Fujifilm X-T5’s superiority lies in its higher maximum video resolution and dimensions. With 6K resolution and dimensions of 6240×4160, it offers greater detail and clarity for videographers. This advantage allows the X-T5 to capture more stunning visuals and provide better overall video quality.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II still delivers impressive video performance with its 4K resolution and dimensions of 3840×2160. Although it falls short of the X-T5’s 6K capabilities, the R6 Mark II remains a strong contender in the market for those seeking high-quality video capture.
In comparing these two cameras, the Fujifilm X-T5 clearly excels in video performance due to its higher resolution and dimensions. This makes it an ideal choice for videographers seeking the best possible video quality. Conversely, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II, while not matching the X-T5’s capabilities, remains a reliable option for those who prioritize video performance but do not require the highest resolution available.
Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on the individual’s preferences and requirements. The Fujifilm X-T5 is the superior choice for video capabilities, but the Canon EOS R6 Mark II still has much to offer in terms of video performance.
Video
|
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
|
Fujifilm X-T5
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. | |||
---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. | |||
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 3840 x 2160 px | 6240x4160 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 60 p | 60 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. | |||
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MPEG-4, MOV | MOV |
Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Fujifilm X-T5 Features and Benefits
The Fujifilm X-T5 outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in terms of features, scoring 85/100 compared to the Canon’s 72/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a 3-inch screen, touchscreen capabilities, flip screen, WIFI, and Bluetooth connectivity.
The Fujifilm X-T5’s edge over the Canon EOS R6 Mark II is primarily due to its higher screen resolution of 1,840,000 dots, compared to the Canon’s 1,620,000 dots. This difference provides the X-T5 with a clearer and more detailed display, enhancing the user experience while composing shots and reviewing images.
In contrast, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II has the advantage of built-in GPS functionality, which the Fujifilm X-T5 lacks. This feature allows users to geotag their photos, making it easier to organize and locate images based on their shooting locations.
Despite the higher overall feature score of the Fujifilm X-T5, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II’s GPS capability may be more valuable for certain users, depending on their specific needs and preferences. However, the X-T5’s superior screen resolution remains a notable advantage, offering improved image display and overall usability.
To conclude, the Fujifilm X-T5 is the winner in terms of features, mainly due to its higher screen resolution. Nonetheless, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II offers the added benefit of GPS functionality. Potential buyers should weigh the importance of these features in relation to their individual requirements before making a decision.
Features
|
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
|
Fujifilm X-T5
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. | |||
---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. | |||
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. | |||
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. | |||
Screen Type | TFT LCD | LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. | |||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 1,620,000 dots | 1,840,000 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. | |||
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. | |||
Wi-Fi | |||
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. | |||
Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Fujifilm X-T5 Storage and Battery
The Fujifilm X-T5 outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in storage and battery, scoring 76/100 compared to the Canon’s 68/100. Both cameras have two memory card slots and support USB charging. They also accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards; however, the Canon is UHS-II compatible while the Fujifilm is UHS-I compatible.
The Fujifilm X-T5 offers a longer battery life of 580 shots, while the Canon EOS R6 Mark II provides 360 shots. This difference makes the Fujifilm X-T5 more suitable for extended shooting sessions. The Canon’s advantage lies in its UHS-II compatibility, allowing for faster data transfer rates, which is beneficial for burst photography and video recording.
Despite the Canon’s faster memory card compatibility, the Fujifilm X-T5’s longer battery life makes it the better choice for storage and battery performance. The Canon EOS R6 Mark II still offers respectable performance in this category, but the Fujifilm X-T5 proves to be the superior option.
Storage and Battery
|
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
|
Fujifilm X-T5
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | |
---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots | |||
Battery Type | LP-E6NH | NP-W235 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 360 shots | 580 shots | |
USB Charging |
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
|
Fujifilm X-T5
|
Scores
|
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
|
Fujifilm X-T5
|
Alternatives to the Canon EOS R6 Mark II and Fujifilm X-T5
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS R6 Mark II or the Fujifilm X-T5:
User Scores
|
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
|
Fujifilm X-T5
|