CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Sony a7 IV Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Canon EOS R6 Mark II

Canon EOS R6 Mark II camera image
78%

Sony a7 IV

sony a7 iv
Winner!
84%
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
vs
Sony a7 IV
Price
2699
2499
Brand
Canon
Sony
Model
EOS R6 Mark II
a7 IV
Released
2022
2021
Announcement Date
11/02/2022
21/10/2021
Camera Type
Mirrorless
Mirrorless
Camera Size
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
131 x 96 x 80 mm
Camera Weight
588
659
Compare

The Sony a7 IV takes the lead with a score of 84/100, while the Canon EOS R6 Mark II trails by 6 points at 78/100. Both cameras share similarities as mirrorless models, released in 2021 and 2022, and priced at $2499. They also have comparable dimensions, with the Canon being slightly larger at 138.4 x 98.4 x 88.4mm and the Sony at 131 x 96 x 80mm.

The Sony a7 IV’s advantage lies in its higher score, reflecting its superior performance and quality. On the other hand, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II is lighter at 588g, compared to the Sony’s 659g, offering a more comfortable shooting experience.

Taking into account the specifications and performance, the Sony a7 IV stands out as the better camera. However, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II’s lighter weight may appeal to some users who prioritize portability and ease of use.

Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Sony a7 IV Overview and Optics

The Sony a7 IV wins the optics comparison with a score of 85/100, while the Canon EOS R6 Mark II scores 83/100. Both cameras share some similarities in their specifications, including a CMOS sensor, full-frame sensor size, and image stabilization. Additionally, they both have their respective lens mounts, with the Canon using the RF mount and the Sony using the FE mount.

The Sony a7 IV performs better in terms of megapixels and sensor quality, boasting 33 megapixels and a DXOMARK score of 97 for its sensor, compared to the Canon’s 24 megapixels and DXOMARK score of 91. The higher megapixel count and sensor score translate to better image quality and detail, making the Sony a7 IV a superior choice for photographers seeking optimal image resolution.

On the other hand, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II excels in shooting speed, offering a remarkable 40 shots per second, while the Sony a7 IV only manages 10 shots per second. This advantage makes the Canon EOS R6 Mark II more suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects and action photography.

In conclusion, the Sony a7 IV outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in terms of image quality and sensor performance, making it the preferred option for photographers who prioritize resolution and detail. However, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II’s superior shooting speed makes it a strong contender for those who require rapid capture capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on the specific needs and priorities of the photographer.

Optics
Optics
83%
85%
Megapixels
24 MP
33 MP
Image Resolution
6000 x 4000 px
7008 x 4672 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
24 x 36 mm
23.8 x 35.6 mm
Sensor Format
Full Frame
Full Frame
Frame Rate
40 fps
10 fps
Lens Mount
Canon RF
Sony E
Image Processor
Digic X
Bionz XR
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Native)
102400
51200
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
50
50
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
204800
204400
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 8000 s
1/ 8000 s
Autofocus Points
4897
759
In-body Stabilization
1
1
Viewfinder Type
Electronic
Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution
3690000 dots
3686400 dots

Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Sony a7 IV Video Performance

The Sony a7 IV outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in video capabilities, with a video score of 91/100 compared to the Canon’s 83/100. Both cameras share some common video specifications, such as 4K max video resolution and 3840 x 2160 max video dimensions. Additionally, both cameras have built-in time-lapse functionality.

The Sony a7 IV surpasses the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in several aspects. Firstly, the a7 IV offers a higher max video frame rate of 120fps, compared to the 60fps of the Canon R6 Mark II. This allows for smoother slow-motion footage and more creative options for videographers. The higher video score of the Sony a7 IV also suggests better overall video quality, making it the superior option for those focused on videography.

On the other hand, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II still provides solid video performance with its 4K max video resolution and 60fps max video frame rate. Although it falls short in comparison to the Sony a7 IV, the Canon R6 Mark II remains a viable option for casual video shooters or photographers who occasionally dabble in videography.

When comparing the video capabilities of these two cameras, the Sony a7 IV emerges as the clear winner due to its higher video score and superior max video frame rate. While the Canon EOS R6 Mark II offers decent video performance, those seeking the best video quality and features should opt for the Sony a7 IV.

Video
Video
83%
91%
Video
1
1
Max Video Resolution
4K
4K
Max Video Dimensions
3840 x 2160 px
3840 x 2160 px
Max Video Frame Rate
60 p
120 p
Time-Lapse Built In
1
1
Video File Format
MPEG-4, MOV
MPEG-4, XAVC S, XAVC HS, XAVC S-I, H.264, H.265

Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Sony a7 IV Features and Benefits

The Sony a7 IV emerges as the winner in this comparison, scoring 83/100, while the Canon EOS R6 Mark II trails behind with a score of 72/100. Both cameras share several features, including a 3-inch touchscreen, flip screen, WIFI, and Bluetooth capabilities.

The Sony a7 IV outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in terms of screen resolution, offering 1,040,000 dots compared to the Canon’s 1,620,000 dots. This higher resolution provides the Sony a7 IV with a clearer and sharper display, enhancing the user’s experience while composing and reviewing images. Additionally, the Sony a7 IV possesses GPS functionality, which the Canon EOS R6 Mark II lacks. This feature allows users to geotag their images, making it easier to track and organize photos based on location.

On the other hand, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II has a higher feature score, but it does not necessarily make it a better camera. Its additional features may not be as relevant or important to some users, depending on their specific needs and preferences.

In comparing these two cameras, it is clear that the Sony a7 IV offers a superior screen resolution and GPS capabilities. Meanwhile, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II’s higher feature score may not necessarily translate to a better camera for all users. When making a decision between these two cameras, potential buyers should consider their individual needs, preferences, and the importance of each feature to determine which camera best suits their requirements.

Features
Features
72%
83%
Built-in Flash
External Flash
1
1
GPS
Weather Sealing
1
1
Screen Type
TFT LCD
LCD
Touch Screen
1
1
Screen Size
3
3
Screen Resolution
1620000 dots
1040000 dots
Flip Screen
1
1
Live View
1
1
Wi-Fi
1
1
Bluetooth
1
1

Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Sony a7 IV Storage and Battery

The Sony a7 IV outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in storage and battery with a score of 76/100 compared to the Canon’s 68/100. Both cameras share common specifications, including two memory card slots and USB charging capability. However, the Sony a7 IV surpasses the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in certain aspects.

The Sony a7 IV offers longer battery life, providing 580 shots per charge compared to the Canon’s 360 shots. Additionally, the Sony a7 IV accepts both CFexpress Type A and SD (UHS-II compatible) memory cards, offering more flexibility in storage options. On the other hand, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II only accepts SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) memory cards.

Despite its lower score, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II still offers reliable storage and battery performance with its LP-E6NH battery type and compatibility with widely available SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) memory cards.

The Sony a7 IV proves to be the superior choice in terms of storage and battery life, making it ideal for photographers requiring extended shooting sessions and versatile storage options. The Canon EOS R6 Mark II remains a solid option for those who prioritize SD card compatibility and are satisfied with its battery performance.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
68%
76%
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible)
CFexpress Type A, SD (UHS-II compatible)
Dual Memory Card Slots
1
1
Battery Type
LP-E6NH
NP-FZ100
Battery Life
360 shots
580 shots
USB Charging
1
1
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Overall Score
97
Portrait (Color Depth)
N/A
25.4 bits
Landscape (Dynamic Range)
N/A
14.7 EVs
Sports (Low-Light ISO)
N/A
3379
Scores
Main Features
Extra Features
Construction and Durability
Handling and Ergonomics
Value for Money
Total Score

Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Sony a7 IV – Our Verdict

Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Sony a7 IV Comparison image.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS R6 Mark II or the Sony a7 IV:

User Scores
B&H photo video
1
amazon
Spotted a mistake with these specs? Please let us know so we can update it!