Side-by-side specs, scores and live prices. Start over
 78
SCORE
|
✓ WINNER
 84
SCORE
|
|
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Brand | Canon | Sony |
| Model | EOS R6 Mark II | a7 IV |
Released ⓘRefers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. |
2022 | 2021 |
Announcement date ⓘRefers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. |
11/02/2022 | 21/10/2021 |
| Camera type | Mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Camera size | 138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm | 131 x 96 x 80 mm |
| Camera weight | 588 g | 659 g |
| Optics | ||
Megapixels ⓘThe higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. |
24 MP050 | 33 MP050 |
Image resolution ⓘImage resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. |
6000 x 4000 | 7008 x 4672 |
Sensor type ⓘThe camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. |
CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size ⓘThe sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. |
24 x 36 | 23.8 x 35.6 |
Sensor format ⓘRefers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |
Full Frame | Full Frame |
Continuous shooting ⓘThe number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. |
40 fps045 | 10 fps045 |
Lens mount ⓘThe lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. |
Canon RF | Sony E |
Image processor ⓘThe image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. |
Digic X | Bionz XR |
Aspect ratio ⓘThe aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |
3:2 | 3:2 |
Min ISO ⓘRefers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. |
10030200 | 10030200 |
Max ISO ⓘRefers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. |
1024003003280000 | 512003003280000 |
Min ISO (expanded) ⓘExpanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. |
5030200 | 5030200 |
Max ISO (expanded) ⓘExpanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. |
2048003003280000 | 2044003003280000 |
Minimum shutter speed ⓘThe minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. |
3044080 | 3044080 |
Max shutter speed ⓘThe maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. |
800080032000 | 800080032000 |
Autofocus points ⓘAutofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. |
48970300 | 7590300 |
In-body stabilisation ⓘIn-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |
✓ | ✓ |
Viewfinder type ⓘThe viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. |
Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder dots | 369000009900000 | 368640009900000 |
| Video | ||
Video ⓘIndicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |
✓ | ✓ |
Max video resolution ⓘThe best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |
4K | 4K |
Max video format ⓘVideo resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. |
3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
Max video frame rate ⓘHow many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. |
60 fps | 120 fps |
Timelapse built in ⓘA built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |
✓ | ✓ |
Video file format ⓘDifferent cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. |
MPEG-4, MOV | MPEG-4, XAVC S, XAVC HS, XAVC S-I, H.264, H.265 |
| Features | ||
Builtin flash ⓘA built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |
✗ | ✗ |
External flash ⓘExternal flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |
✓ | ✓ |
GPS ⓘGPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |
✗ | ✗ |
Weather sealing ⓘWeather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Screen type | TFT LCD | LCD |
Touch screen ⓘTouchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen dots ⓘScreen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. |
16200001150001500000 | 10400001150001500000 |
Flip screen ⓘA flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |
✓ | ✓ |
Live view ⓘLive View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |
✓ | ✓ |
Wi-Fi ⓘBuilt-in Wi-Fi allows you to connect your camera and share images wirelessly. |
✓ | ✓ |
Bluetooth ⓘBluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Storage & battery | ||
| Memory card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | CFexpress Type A, SD (UHS-II compatible) |
| Dual memory card slots | ✓ | ✓ |
| Battery type | LP-E6NH | NP-FZ100 |
Battery life ⓘApproximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. |
360 shots1505000 | 580 shots1505000 |
| USB charging | ✓ | ✓ |
The Sony a7 IV takes the lead with a score of 84/100, while the Canon EOS R6 Mark II trails by 6 points at 78/100. Both cameras share similarities as mirrorless models, released in 2021 and 2022, and priced at $2499. They also have comparable dimensions, with the Canon being slightly larger at 138.4 x 98.4 x 88.4mm and the Sony at 131 x 96 x 80mm.
The Sony a7 IV’s advantage lies in its higher score, reflecting its superior performance and quality. On the other hand, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II is lighter at 588g, compared to the Sony’s 659g, offering a more comfortable shooting experience.
Taking into account the specifications and performance, the Sony a7 IV stands out as the better camera. However, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II’s lighter weight may appeal to some users who prioritize portability and ease of use.
The Sony a7 IV wins the optics comparison with a score of 85/100, while the Canon EOS R6 Mark II scores 83/100. Both cameras share some similarities in their specifications, including a CMOS sensor, full-frame sensor size, and image stabilization. Additionally, they both have their respective lens mounts, with the Canon using the RF mount and the Sony using the FE mount.
The Sony a7 IV performs better in terms of megapixels and sensor quality, boasting 33 megapixels and a DXOMARK score of 97 for its sensor, compared to the Canon’s 24 megapixels and DXOMARK score of 91. The higher megapixel count and sensor score translate to better image quality and detail, making the Sony a7 IV a superior choice for photographers seeking optimal image resolution.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II excels in shooting speed, offering a remarkable 40 shots per second, while the Sony a7 IV only manages 10 shots per second. This advantage makes the Canon EOS R6 Mark II more suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects and action photography.
In conclusion, the Sony a7 IV outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in terms of image quality and sensor performance, making it the preferred option for photographers who prioritize resolution and detail. However, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II’s superior shooting speed makes it a strong contender for those who require rapid capture capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on the specific needs and priorities of the photographer.
The Sony a7 IV outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in video capabilities, with a video score of 91/100 compared to the Canon’s 83/100. Both cameras share some common video specifications, such as 4K max video resolution and 3840 x 2160 max video dimensions. Additionally, both cameras have built-in time-lapse functionality.
The Sony a7 IV surpasses the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in several aspects. Firstly, the a7 IV offers a higher max video frame rate of 120fps, compared to the 60fps of the Canon R6 Mark II. This allows for smoother slow-motion footage and more creative options for videographers. The higher video score of the Sony a7 IV also suggests better overall video quality, making it the superior option for those focused on videography.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II still provides solid video performance with its 4K max video resolution and 60fps max video frame rate. Although it falls short in comparison to the Sony a7 IV, the Canon R6 Mark II remains a viable option for casual video shooters or photographers who occasionally dabble in videography.
When comparing the video capabilities of these two cameras, the Sony a7 IV emerges as the clear winner due to its higher video score and superior max video frame rate. While the Canon EOS R6 Mark II offers decent video performance, those seeking the best video quality and features should opt for the Sony a7 IV.
The Sony a7 IV emerges as the winner in this comparison, scoring 83/100, while the Canon EOS R6 Mark II trails behind with a score of 72/100. Both cameras share several features, including a 3-inch touchscreen, flip screen, WIFI, and Bluetooth capabilities.
The Sony a7 IV outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in terms of screen resolution, offering 1,040,000 dots compared to the Canon’s 1,620,000 dots. This higher resolution provides the Sony a7 IV with a clearer and sharper display, enhancing the user’s experience while composing and reviewing images. Additionally, the Sony a7 IV possesses GPS functionality, which the Canon EOS R6 Mark II lacks. This feature allows users to geotag their images, making it easier to track and organize photos based on location.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II has a higher feature score, but it does not necessarily make it a better camera. Its additional features may not be as relevant or important to some users, depending on their specific needs and preferences.
In comparing these two cameras, it is clear that the Sony a7 IV offers a superior screen resolution and GPS capabilities. Meanwhile, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II’s higher feature score may not necessarily translate to a better camera for all users. When making a decision between these two cameras, potential buyers should consider their individual needs, preferences, and the importance of each feature to determine which camera best suits their requirements.
The Sony a7 IV outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in storage and battery with a score of 76/100 compared to the Canon’s 68/100. Both cameras share common specifications, including two memory card slots and USB charging capability. However, the Sony a7 IV surpasses the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in certain aspects.
The Sony a7 IV offers longer battery life, providing 580 shots per charge compared to the Canon’s 360 shots. Additionally, the Sony a7 IV accepts both CFexpress Type A and SD (UHS-II compatible) memory cards, offering more flexibility in storage options. On the other hand, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II only accepts SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) memory cards.
Despite its lower score, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II still offers reliable storage and battery performance with its LP-E6NH battery type and compatibility with widely available SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) memory cards.
The Sony a7 IV proves to be the superior choice in terms of storage and battery life, making it ideal for photographers requiring extended shooting sessions and versatile storage options. The Canon EOS R6 Mark II remains a solid option for those who prioritize SD card compatibility and are satisfied with its battery performance.
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS R6 Mark II or the Sony a7 IV:
