Side-by-side specs, scores and live prices. Start over
 78
SCORE
|
✓ WINNER
 84
SCORE
|
|
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Released ⓘRefers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. |
2022 | 2019 |
Announcement date ⓘRefers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. |
11/02/2022 | 16/07/2019 |
| Camera type | Mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Camera size | 138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm | 129 x 96 x 78 mm |
| Camera weight | 588 g | 665 g |
| Optics | ||
Megapixels ⓘThe higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. |
24 MP050 | 61.2 MP050 |
Image resolution ⓘImage resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. |
6000 x 4000 | 9504 x 6336 |
Sensor type ⓘThe camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. |
CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size ⓘThe sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. |
24 x 36 | 23.8 x 35.7 |
Sensor format ⓘRefers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |
Full Frame | Full Frame |
Continuous shooting ⓘThe number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. |
40 fps045 | 10 fps045 |
Lens mount ⓘThe lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. |
Canon RF | Sony FE |
Image processor ⓘThe image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. |
Digic X | Bionz X |
Aspect ratio ⓘThe aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |
3:2 | 3:2 |
Min ISO ⓘRefers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. |
10030200 | 10030200 |
Max ISO ⓘRefers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. |
1024003003280000 | 320003003280000 |
Min ISO (expanded) ⓘExpanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. |
5030200 | 5030200 |
Max ISO (expanded) ⓘExpanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. |
2048003003280000 | 1024003003280000 |
Minimum shutter speed ⓘThe minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. |
3044080 | 3044080 |
Max shutter speed ⓘThe maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. |
800080032000 | 800080032000 |
Autofocus points ⓘAutofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. |
48970300 | 4250300 |
In-body stabilisation ⓘIn-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |
✓ | ✓ |
Viewfinder type ⓘThe viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. |
Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder dots | 369000009900000 | 576000009900000 |
| Video | ||
Video ⓘIndicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |
✓ | ✓ |
Max video resolution ⓘThe best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |
4K | 4K |
Max video format ⓘVideo resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. |
3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
Max video frame rate ⓘHow many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. |
60 fps | 30 fps |
Timelapse built in ⓘA built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |
✓ | ✓ |
Video file format ⓘDifferent cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. |
MPEG-4, MOV | XAVC S, AVCHD Ver. 2.0, MP4 |
| Features | ||
Builtin flash ⓘA built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |
✗ | ✗ |
External flash ⓘExternal flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |
✓ | ✓ |
GPS ⓘGPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |
✗ | ✗ |
Weather sealing ⓘWeather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Screen type | TFT LCD | LCD |
Touch screen ⓘTouchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen dots ⓘScreen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. |
16200001150001500000 | 14400001150001500000 |
Flip screen ⓘA flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |
✓ | ✓ |
Live view ⓘLive View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |
✓ | ✓ |
Wi-Fi ⓘBuilt-in Wi-Fi allows you to connect your camera and share images wirelessly. |
✓ | ✓ |
Bluetooth ⓘBluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Storage & battery | ||
| Memory card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) |
| Dual memory card slots | ✓ | ✓ |
| Battery type | LP-E6NH | NP-FZ100 |
Battery life ⓘApproximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. |
360 shots1505000 | 670 shots1505000 |
| USB charging | ✓ | ✓ |
The Sony a7R IV edges out the Canon EOS R6 Mark II with a score of 84/100 compared to 78/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were released in 2019 and 2022, respectively. They share common specifications, such as camera type and similar size, with the Sony a7R IV measuring 129 x 96 x 78mm and the Canon EOS R6 Mark II at 138.4 �� 98.4 �� 88.4mm.
The Sony a7R IV excels with a higher score, which reflects its superior performance and features. On the other hand, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II has a lower launch price of $2499 compared to the Sony a7R IV’s $3500, making it a more affordable option. Additionally, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II is lighter, weighing 588g compared to the Sony a7R IV’s 665g.
Taking these factors into account, the Sony a7R IV is the better camera in terms of performance and features. However, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II offers a more budget-friendly and lightweight option for those seeking a high-quality mirrorless camera.
The Sony a7R IV wins the optics comparison with a score of 85/100, while the Canon EOS R6 Mark II achieves a score of 83/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a CMOS sensor, full-frame sensor size, and built-in image stabilization. Additionally, they both have lens mounts specific to their respective brands, with the Canon using an RF mount and the Sony using an FE mount.
The Sony a7R IV outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in terms of megapixels and sensor quality. With 61.2 megapixels, the Sony a7R IV captures more detail in images than the Canon, which has 24 megapixels. The Sony’s sensor also has a higher DXOMARK score of 99, compared to the Canon’s 91, indicating better overall sensor performance.
In contrast, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II excels in shooting speed, boasting a rate of 40 frames per second (fps), significantly faster than the Sony a7R IV’s 10 fps. This makes the Canon more suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects or action photography.
The Sony a7R IV’s superior megapixel count and sensor quality make it the better option for photographers seeking high-resolution images and optimal sensor performance. On the other hand, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II’s faster shooting speed provides an advantage for those prioritizing action photography. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on the specific needs and preferences of the photographer.
The Canon EOS R6 Mark II outperforms the Sony a7R IV in video capabilities, scoring 83/100 compared to the Sony’s 70/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as 4K max video resolution, 3840 x 2160 video dimensions, and built-in time-lapse functionality. However, there are significant differences that give the Canon EOS R6 Mark II an edge over the Sony a7R IV.
The Canon EOS R6 Mark II boasts a higher max video frame rate of 60fps, compared to the Sony a7R IV’s 30fps. This allows for smoother video footage and better slow-motion capabilities, providing more versatility for videographers. The higher frame rate is a key factor contributing to the Canon’s higher video score.
On the other hand, the Sony a7R IV does not offer any distinct advantages over the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in terms of video capabilities. Both cameras have the same video resolution, dimensions, and time-lapse functionality. The lower video score for the Sony a7R IV is primarily due to its lower max video frame rate.
Considering these factors, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II is the better choice for videographers who prioritize smooth, high-quality footage and slow-motion capabilities. The Sony a7R IV, while still offering excellent video features, falls short in comparison due to its lower max video frame rate. Therefore, the higher video score of the Canon EOS R6 Mark II reflects its superior video performance and makes it a more appealing option for those focused on video capabilities.
The Sony a7R IV outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in features with a score of 83/100 compared to the Canon’s 72/100. Both cameras share several specifications, such as a 3-inch touchscreen, flip screen, WIFI, and Bluetooth connectivity.
The Sony a7R IV has a higher feature score primarily because it offers a higher screen resolution of 1,440,000 dots, compared to the Canon EOS R6 Mark II’s 1,620,000 dots. This difference results in a sharper and more detailed display on the Sony a7R IV, providing a better user experience when previewing images and navigating menus.
However, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II does have an advantage over the Sony a7R IV in terms of GPS functionality. The Canon camera includes a built-in GPS, allowing users to geotag their images, which can be useful for travel photography and location-based projects. The Sony a7R IV lacks this feature.
Taking these points into consideration, the Sony a7R IV is the superior camera in terms of features, mainly due to its higher screen resolution. The Canon EOS R6 Mark II, however, offers the added benefit of GPS functionality. Users should weigh the importance of these features when making their decision between the two cameras.
The Sony a7R IV outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in storage and battery, scoring 79 points compared to Canon’s 68 points. Both cameras share similarities, including two memory card slots and compatibility with SD, SDHC, and SDXC (UHS-II) memory cards. Additionally, both cameras offer USB charging capabilities.
The Sony a7R IV shines with a superior battery life of 670 shots, almost doubling the Canon EOS R6 Mark II’s 360 shots. This advantage allows Sony users to capture more images before needing to recharge or swap batteries.
The Canon EOS R6 Mark II does not outperform the Sony a7R IV in any storage and battery aspects. However, its score of 68 points still demonstrates reliable performance in this category.
Taking these factors into account, the Sony a7R IV proves to be a better choice for photographers seeking longer battery life and efficient storage options. The Canon EOS R6 Mark II remains a capable camera, but falls short compared to the Sony a7R IV in storage and battery performance.
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS R6 Mark II or the Sony a7R IV:
