CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Canon EOS RP vs Olympus OM-D E-M10
Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Canon EOS RP

canon eos rp
Winner!
65%

Olympus OM-D E-M10

Olympus OM-D E-M10
54%
Canon EOS RP
vs
Olympus OM-D E-M10
Price
Brand
Canon
Olympus
Model
EOS RP
OM-D E-M10
Released
2019
2014
Announcement Date
February 14, 2019
January 29, 2014
Camera Type
Mirrorless
Mirrorless
Camera Size
Camera Weight
Optics
Optics
67%
57%
Megapixels
26 MP
16.1 MP
Image Resolution
6240 x 4160 px
4608 x 3456 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
24 x 35.9 mm
13 x 17.3 mm
Sensor Format
Full Frame
Micro Four Thirds
Frame Rate
5 fps
8 fps
Lens Mount
Canon RF
Micro 4/3
Image Processor
Digic 8
TruePic VII
Aspect Ratio
3:2
4:3
Minimum ISO (Native)
100
200
Maximum ISO (Native)
40,000
25,600
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
102400
25600
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
60 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 4000 s
1/ 4000 s
Autofocus Points
4,779
81
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
Electronic
Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution
2,360,000 dots
1,440,000 dots
Video
Video
70%
57%
Video
Max Video Resolution
4K
Full HD
Max Video Dimensions
3840 x 2160 px
1920 x 1080 px
Max Video Frame Rate
25 p
30 p
Time-Lapse Built In
Video File Format
MP4
MOV
Features
Features
70%
57%
Built-in Flash
External Flash
GPS
Weather Sealing
Screen Type
LCD
LCD
Touch Screen
Screen Size
3"
3"
Screen Resolution
1,040,000 dots
1,037,000 dots
Flip Screen
Live View
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
29%
21%
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible)
SD / SDHC / SDXC
Dual Memory Card Slots
Battery Type
LP-E17
BLS-5
Battery Life
250 shots
320 shots
USB Charging
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Overall Score
85%
72%
Portrait (Color Depth)
24.3 bits
22.8 bits
Landscape (Dynamic Range)
11.9 EVs
12.3 EVs
Sports (Low-Light ISO)
2978
884
Scores
Main Features
80%
N/A
Extra Features
64%
N/A
Construction and Durability
80%
N/A
Handling and Ergonomics
67%
N/A
Value for Money
80%
N/A
Total Score
74%
N/A
User Scores
Spotted a mistake with these specs? Please let us know so we can update it!