If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything).
Prices last updated on .
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything).
Prices last updated on .
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
The Sony a6400 outperforms the Canon EOS RP with a score of 70/100 compared to 65/100. Both cameras are mirrorless, launched in 2019, and have similar dimensions. However, the a6400 is slightly smaller and lighter, measuring 120 x 67 x 60mm and weighing 403g, while the EOS RP measures 133 x 85 x 70mm and weighs 440g.
The Sony a6400 excels with a lower launch price of $900, compared to the EOS RP’s $1300. The Canon EOS RP does not have any clear advantages over the Sony a6400 in general specifications.
Considering the scores, size, weight, and price, the Sony a6400 is the better choice for those seeking a compact and more affordable mirrorless camera.
Canon EOS RP vs Sony a6400 Overview and Optics
The Sony a6400 narrowly edges out the Canon EOS RP in optics, scoring 68/100 compared to the EOS RP’s 67/100. Both cameras share several specifications: they both have a CMOS sensor, no image stabilization, and similar megapixel counts (24.2 for the Sony a6400 and 26 for the Canon EOS RP). However, there are distinct differences that contribute to the Sony a6400’s slightly higher score.
The Sony a6400 has a faster shooting speed of 11 frames per second (fps) compared to the Canon EOS RP’s 5 fps. This allows the a6400 to capture fast-moving subjects more effectively. Additionally, the Sony a6400 features an APS-C sensor, which is smaller than the full-frame sensor found in the Canon EOS RP. This makes the a6400 more compact and lightweight, making it a more convenient option for photographers on the go.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS RP has some advantages over the Sony a6400. Its full-frame sensor provides better low-light performance and a shallower depth of field. The EOS RP also has a slightly higher DXOMARK score for its sensor (85) compared to the a6400’s score (83), indicating better overall image quality. Furthermore, the Canon EOS RP features the Canon RF lens mount, which offers a wider range of high-quality lenses compared to the Sony E-mount.
While the Sony a6400 is the winner in terms of optics, the Canon EOS RP still holds its own with a full-frame sensor and superior lens options. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras will depend on the photographer’s preferences and specific needs.
Optics
Canon EOS RP
Sony a6400
Megapixels
26 MP
24.2 MP
Image Resolution
6240 x 4160 px
6000 x 4000 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
24 x 35.9 mm
15.6 x 23.5 mm
Sensor Format
Full Frame
APS-C
Frame Rate
5 fps
11 fps
Lens Mount
Canon RF
Sony E
Image Processor
Digic 8
Bionz X
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Native)
40,000
32,000
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
102400
102400
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 4000 s
1/ 4000 s
Autofocus Points
4,779
425
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
Electronic
Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution
2,360,000 dots
2,359,296 dots
Canon EOS RP vs Sony a6400 Video Performance
The Sony a6400 outperforms the Canon EOS RP in video capabilities, with a score of 91/100 compared to the EOS RP’s 70/100. Both cameras share some common video specifications, such as 4K maximum video resolution and 3840 x 2160 maximum video dimensions. Additionally, both cameras have built-in time-lapse functionality.
The Sony a6400 excels in its video capabilities due to its higher maximum video frame rate of 120fps, which is significantly better than the Canon EOS RP’s 25fps. This higher frame rate allows the a6400 to capture smoother and more detailed slow-motion footage, making it a better choice for videographers who require high-quality slow-motion capabilities.
While the Canon EOS RP trails behind in terms of video frame rate, it still offers respectable video performance with its 4K resolution and time-lapse functionality. However, its lower frame rate of 25fps might not be sufficient for professional videographers who require more flexibility and smoother footage.
Considering the video capabilities of both cameras, the Sony a6400 is the clear winner, providing better slow-motion performance with its higher frame rate. The Canon EOS RP, while offering decent video quality, may not be the best choice for those who prioritize video performance due to its lower frame rate. For users who value high-quality video and slow-motion capabilities, the Sony a6400 is the superior choice.
Video
Canon EOS RP
Sony a6400
Video
Max Video Resolution
4K
4K
Max Video Dimensions
3840 x 2160 px
3840 x 2160 px
Max Video Frame Rate
25 p
120 p
Time-Lapse Built In
Video File Format
MP4
MPEG-4, AVCHD Ver. 2.0, XAVC S
Canon EOS RP vs Sony a6400 Features and Benefits
The Sony a6400 emerges as the winner in the features comparison, scoring 81/100, while the Canon EOS RP scores 70/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a 3-inch touchscreen, flip screen, WiFi, and Bluetooth connectivity. However, neither camera offers GPS functionality.
The Sony a6400 outperforms the Canon EOS RP in terms of screen resolution, boasting 921,600 dots compared to the EOS RP’s 1,040,000 dots. This higher resolution provides crisper and more detailed images, making it easier for photographers to review their shots and make necessary adjustments.
Although the Canon EOS RP falls short in this comparison, it still has its strengths. For instance, the screen resolution difference may not be significant enough to impact the overall user experience. Additionally, the EOS RP maintains a solid foundation of features that are essential for modern photography, such as a touchscreen, flip screen, WiFi, and Bluetooth connectivity.
To conclude, the Sony a6400 offers a better set of features compared to the Canon EOS RP, as evidenced by its higher score. The superior screen resolution is a notable advantage for the a6400, ensuring a better viewing experience. However, the Canon EOS RP remains a competent camera with a reliable set of features, providing a satisfactory user experience.
Features
Canon EOS RP
Sony a6400
Built-in Flash
External Flash
GPS
Weather Sealing
Screen Type
LCD
LCD
Touch Screen
Screen Size
3"
3"
Screen Resolution
1,040,000 dots
921,600 dots
Flip Screen
Live View
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Canon EOS RP vs Sony a6400 Storage and Battery
The Sony a6400 outperforms the Canon EOS RP in storage and battery, scoring 37/100 compared to the Canon’s 29/100. Both cameras have a single memory card slot and support USB charging. They accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards, but the Sony a6400 also takes Memory Stick Duo cards and is UHS-I compatible, while the Canon EOS RP is UHS-II compatible.
The Sony a6400 has a longer battery life, providing 410 shots per charge, compared to the Canon EOS RP’s 250 shots. The Sony uses the NP-FW50 battery type, while the Canon uses the LP-E17 battery type.
Although the Canon EOS RP has a lower storage and battery score, it offers UHS-II compatibility, which allows for faster data transfer rates when using compatible memory cards.
Considering the storage and battery aspects, the Sony a6400 offers better battery life and versatility in memory card compatibility. The Canon EOS RP, however, provides faster data transfer rates with UHS-II compatibility.
Storage and Battery
Canon EOS RP
Sony a6400
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible)
SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Duo (UHS-I compatible)
If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything).
Prices last updated on .
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything).
Prices last updated on .
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.