Fujifilm GFX 50R vs GFX 50S II Comparison

The Fujifilm GFX 50S II takes the lead with a score of 79, outperforming the Fujifilm GFX 50R‘s score of 76 by 3 points. Both cameras are mirrorless and share announcement dates in September, with the GFX 50R being released in 2018 and the GFX 50S II in 2021. They also have similar launch prices, with the GFX 50R at $4499 and the GFX 50S II at $3999.

The winning GFX 50S II has a smaller body, measuring 150 x 104 x 87mm, compared to the GFX 50R’s 161 x 97 x 66mm. However, the GFX 50R is lighter, weighing 775g, while the GFX 50S II weighs 900g. The GFX 50S II’s compact size may offer better portability, while the GFX 50R’s lighter weight could provide more comfort during extended use.

Taking these factors into account, the Fujifilm GFX 50S II proves to be a better camera due to its higher score and smaller size, while the Fujifilm GFX 50R still has its advantages with a lighter weight.

Fujifilm GFX 50R vs GFX 50S II Overview and Optics

The Fujifilm GFX 50S II emerges as the winner in the optics comparison with a score of 77/100, while the Fujifilm GFX 50R scores 72/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including 51-megapixel resolution, a shooting speed of 3 frames per second, a CMOS sensor, medium format sensor size, and the Fujifilm G lens mount. Despite these similarities, there are key differences that contribute to the GFX 50S II’s higher score.

The Fujifilm GFX 50S II outperforms the GFX 50R due to its advanced X-Processor 4. This processor enhances image quality, improves noise reduction, and increases autofocus speed. Additionally, the GFX 50S II features image stabilization, which reduces camera shake and allows for sharper images in low-light conditions or when using slower shutter speeds. This advantage makes the GFX 50S II a more versatile camera for various shooting scenarios.

On the other hand, the Fujifilm GFX 50R utilizes the older X-Processor Pro. Although it does not offer the same level of performance as the GFX 50S II, the GFX 50R remains a reliable option for photographers who prioritize compactness and affordability. The absence of image stabilization may not be a significant drawback for those who primarily shoot in well-lit situations or with a tripod.

In comparing the Fujifilm GFX 50R and GFX 50S II, the latter’s superior processor and image stabilization make it the more capable camera in terms of optics. However, the GFX 50R still has value for photographers who prioritize a smaller form factor and lower cost. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras will depend on individual preferences and specific shooting requirements.

The Fujifilm GFX 50R and Fujifilm GFX 50S II both have a video score of 57/100, indicating that neither camera is a clear winner in this category. Both cameras share the same video specifications, including a maximum video resolution of Full HD, maximum video dimensions of 1920 x 1080, a maximum video frame rate of 30fps, and built-in time-lapse functionality.

The similarities in video capabilities make it difficult to determine a superior camera in this aspect. However, the shared features of both cameras ensure that users can expect consistent video performance and quality from either model.

Despite the identical video scores, there may be factors unrelated to video specifications that could influence a user’s preference for one camera over the other. These factors could include the camera’s design, ergonomics, or other features not directly related to video performance.

In conclusion, the Fujifilm GFX 50R and Fujifilm GFX 50S II offer the same video capabilities, with neither camera outperforming the other in this area. Users should consider other factors, such as design and ergonomics, when deciding between these two cameras.

The Fujifilm GFX 50R and the Fujifilm GFX 50S II both receive a feature score of 87/100, indicating that they are equally matched in terms of features. They share many common specifications, such as a 3.2-inch screen size, 2,360,000-dot screen resolution, and the presence of a touchscreen and flip screen. Additionally, neither camera has GPS capabilities, but both are equipped with WiFi and Bluetooth connectivity.

Since both cameras have the same feature score, it is not possible to declare a winner based solely on their specifications. Nonetheless, it is essential to examine the unique advantages each camera might offer to determine which one is better suited for specific needs.

The Fujifilm GFX 50R, despite having the same features as the GFX 50S II, could potentially offer a more compact and lightweight design, making it more suitable for photographers who value portability and ease of use. However, without further information on the cameras’ dimensions and weight, it is impossible to confirm this advantage.

On the other hand, the Fujifilm GFX 50S II may provide better ergonomics and handling, as well as improved performance in certain areas such as autofocus or low-light capabilities. Again, without additional information, it is difficult to confirm this advantage.

Given the equal feature scores and shared specifications, it is reasonable to conclude that both the Fujifilm GFX 50R and the Fujifilm GFX 50S II are excellent cameras with similar capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between the two would come down to personal preferences and specific requirements, such as size, weight, and performance in particular shooting conditions.

The Fujifilm GFX 50R and the Fujifilm GFX 50S II have identical storage and battery scores, both at 71/100. They share the same storage specifications, including two memory card slots and compatibility with SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards (UHS-II compatible). Both cameras also feature USB charging capabilities.

Though their scores are the same, the GFX 50S II has a slight advantage in battery life, offering 440 shots per charge compared to the GFX 50R’s 400 shots. This difference is due to the GFX 50S II using an NP-W235 battery, while the GFX 50R uses an NP-T125 battery. However, this advantage may not significantly impact users’ experience.

Despite the GFX 50R’s shorter battery life, it remains on par with the GFX 50S II in terms of storage and battery performance. Both cameras provide reliable storage options and USB charging capabilities, making them suitable for various photography needs. The choice between the two cameras would ultimately depend on other factors, such as design, features, and price.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Fujifilm GFX 50R or the Fujifilm GFX 50S II:

• Fujifilm GFX 50S II vs Sony a1
• Fujifilm GFX 50S II vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
• Fujifilm GFX 50S II vs GFX100S
• Fujifilm GFX 50S II vs X-H2
• Fujifilm GFX 50S II vs Sony a7 IV
• Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Fujifilm GFX 50S II