CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Fujifilm X-A7 vs X-T200 Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Fujifilm X-A7

Fujifilm X-A7 camera image
64%

Fujifilm X-T200

fujifilm
Winner!
66%
Fujifilm X-A7
vs
Fujifilm X-T200
Price
Brand
Fujifilm
Fujifilm
Model
X-A7
X-T200
Released
2019
2020
Announcement Date
September 12, 2019
January 24, 2020
Camera Type
Mirrorless
Mirrorless
Camera Size
Camera Weight

The Fujifilm X-T200 edges out the X-A7 with a score of 66/100 compared to 64/100. Both cameras are mirrorless, announced in 2019 and 2020 respectively, and share the same launch price of $699. They have similar dimensions, with the X-T200 being slightly larger and heavier at 121 x 84 x 55mm and 370g, compared to the X-A7’s 119 x 38 x 41mm and 320g.

The X-T200’s higher score reveals its overall superiority, offering better performance and features. However, the X-A7’s smaller size and lighter weight make it more portable and convenient for travel or everyday use. Despite the slight difference in scores, both cameras provide excellent value and quality for their price range, catering to different user preferences and needs.

Fujifilm X-A7 vs X-T200 Overview and Optics

The Fujifilm X-T200 outperforms the Fujifilm X-A7 in optics with a score of 67/100, compared to the X-A7’s 63/100. Both cameras share several specifications, such as a 24-megapixel sensor, 8 frames per second shooting speed, CMOS sensor type, unspecified processor, and Fujifilm X lens mount. Additionally, both cameras have an APS-C sensor size, and neither has a DXOMARK score.

The X-T200 excels in optics primarily due to its image stabilization feature, which the X-A7 lacks. Image stabilization significantly reduces camera shake, resulting in sharper images, particularly in low-light conditions or when using telephoto lenses. Moreover, the X-T200 has a 3:2 aspect ratio, which is more versatile for various photography styles, including landscape and portrait shots.

On the other hand, the X-A7 has a 16:9 aspect ratio, which is more suitable for video recording and widescreen viewing. This aspect ratio could be considered advantageous for those who focus on video content creation. However, this advantage is not enough to outweigh the benefits of image stabilization and a more versatile aspect ratio in the X-T200.

In comparing the optics of these two cameras, the Fujifilm X-T200 is the clear winner, providing image stabilization and a versatile aspect ratio that caters to a wider range of photography styles. While the X-A7 may have a slight edge in video content creation due to its 16:9 aspect ratio, it falls short in providing the stability and adaptability that the X-T200 offers.

Optics
Optics
63%
67%
Megapixels
24 MP
24 MP
Image Resolution
6000 x 4000 px
6000 x 4000 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
15.7 x 23.5 mm
23.5 x 15.6 mm
Sensor Format
APS-C
APS-C
Frame Rate
8 fps
8 fps
Lens Mount
Fujifilm X
Fujifilm X
Image Processor
Unspecified
Unspecified
Aspect Ratio
16:9
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
100
200
Maximum ISO (Native)
12,800
12,800
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
50
100
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
204800
51200
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
4 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 4000 s
1/ 4000 s
Autofocus Points
425
425
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
None
Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution
N/A
2,360,000 dots

Fujifilm X-A7 vs X-T200 Video Performance

The Fujifilm X-T200 outperforms the Fujifilm X-A7 in terms of video capabilities, scoring 91/100 compared to the X-A7’s score of 83/100. Both cameras share some key video features, including a maximum video resolution of 4K and dimensions of 3840 x 2160. Additionally, both models come equipped with built-in time-lapse functionality.

The X-T200’s superior video score is mainly due to its higher maximum video frame rate of 120fps, which is double the X-A7’s frame rate of 60fps. This higher frame rate allows the X-T200 to capture smoother and more detailed slow-motion footage, giving it an edge over the X-A7 in terms of overall video performance.

While the X-A7 does not surpass the X-T200 in any specific video-related aspect, it still holds its own with a respectable video score of 83/100. Its 60fps frame rate remains sufficient for most casual users and provides smooth video playback. The built-in time-lapse functionality is also a shared advantage for both cameras.

Taking these factors into account, the Fujifilm X-T200 is the better choice for users seeking enhanced video capabilities, particularly those interested in capturing slow-motion footage. However, the Fujifilm X-A7 remains a viable option for those who prioritize other features and may not require the additional frame rate offered by the X-T200. Ultimately, the decision between these two cameras should be based on individual preferences and specific video needs.

Video
Video
83%
91%
Video
Max Video Resolution
4K
4K
Max Video Dimensions
3840 x 2160 px
3840 x 2160 px
Max Video Frame Rate
60 p
120 p
Time-Lapse Built In
Video File Format
MPEG-4, MOV
MPEG-4, H.264

Fujifilm X-A7 vs X-T200 Features and Benefits

The Fujifilm X-A7 and Fujifilm X-T200 both have a feature score of 74/100, indicating that they share many similarities in terms of features. These cameras have identical screen sizes of 3.5 inches, and their screen resolutions are nearly the same, with the X-A7 having 2,760,000 dots and the X-T200 having 2,780,000 dots. Both cameras also have touchscreens, flip screens, and lack GPS. Additionally, they are both equipped with WIFI and Bluetooth capabilities.

The Fujifilm X-T200 edges out the X-A7 in screen resolution, providing a slightly sharper display for users to view their images and navigate the camera’s settings. This minor difference, however, does not make the X-T200 an overall better camera, as the two cameras share the same feature score.

On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-A7’s features are not significantly better than those of the X-T200. The shared feature score means that both cameras are equally suitable for different users, depending on their individual needs and preferences.

Considering the similarities in features, it is evident that both the Fujifilm X-A7 and the Fujifilm X-T200 are well-matched cameras. The slight difference in screen resolution does not considerably impact the overall performance of either camera. Thus, potential buyers should base their decision on other factors, such as price, design, and personal preferences, rather than solely focusing on the features. Both cameras offer a strong set of features, making them suitable choices for various photography needs.

Features
Features
74%
74%
Built-in Flash
External Flash
GPS
Weather Sealing
Screen Type
LCD
LCD
Touch Screen
Screen Size
3.5"
3.5"
Screen Resolution
2,760,000 dots
2,780,000 dots
Flip Screen
Live View
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth

Fujifilm X-A7 vs X-T200 Storage and Battery

The Fujifilm X-A7 and X-T200 both score 29/100 in storage and battery, indicating identical performance in this aspect. They share the same specifications, with one memory card slot each, accepting SD, SDHC, and SDXC (UHS-I compatible) cards. Both cameras offer 270 shots per charge with the NP-W126S battery type and support USB charging.

Neither camera outperforms the other in storage and battery, as their specifications are equal. Consequently, there is no advantage for either camera in this category. Both cameras provide users with adequate storage options and similar battery life.

In the context of storage and battery, the Fujifilm X-A7 and X-T200 are evenly matched. Therefore, potential buyers should consider other factors, such as general specifications, optics, video, and features, to determine which camera best suits their needs.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
29%
29%
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible)
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible)
Dual Memory Card Slots
Battery Type
NP-W126S
NP-W126S
Battery Life
270 shots
270 shots
USB Charging
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Scores
Main Features
N/A
80%
Extra Features
N/A
68%
Construction and Durability
N/A
67%
Handling and Ergonomics
N/A
53%
Value for Money
N/A
85%
Total Score
N/A
72%

Fujifilm X-A7 vs X-T200 – Our Verdict

Fujifilm X-A7 vs X-T200 Comparison image.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Fujifilm X-A7 or the Fujifilm X-T200:

User Scores
B&H photo video
Spotted a mistake with these camera specs? Please let us know so we can update it!