Fujifilm X-E4 vs Ricoh GR IIIx Comparison
Fujifilm X-E4
Ricoh GR IIIx
Price | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Brand | Fujifilm | Ricoh | |
Model | X-E4 | GR IIIx | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2021 | 2021 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | January 27, 2021 | September 09, 2021 | |
Camera Type |  Mirrorless |  Compact | |
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Fujifilm X-E4 and Ricoh GR IIIx both score 66/100 in our evaluation, making them equally competitive. These mirrorless and compact cameras were released in 2021, sharing similar announcement dates and launch prices of $849 and $999, respectively.
Both cameras share common specs, such as their release year, but the Fujifilm X-E4 stands out with its larger size (121 x 73 x 33mm) and heavier weight (364g). This could indicate a more robust design, catering to users who prefer a sturdier build.
On the other hand, the Ricoh GR IIIx is more compact and lightweight (109 x 62 x 35mm, 262g), making it a great choice for those seeking a portable camera for easy travel and everyday use.
Comparing these cameras, the Fujifilm X-E4 is better suited for users who value a solid build, while the Ricoh GR IIIx is perfect for those prioritizing portability. Both cameras offer unique benefits, catering to different user preferences.
Fujifilm X-E4 vs Ricoh GR IIIx Overview and Optics
The Ricoh GR IIIx narrowly wins in optics with a score of 68/100, compared to the Fujifilm X-E4’s 67/100. Both cameras share several common specifications. They both have CMOS sensors, APS-C sensor sizes, and similar megapixel counts, with the X-E4 having 26 megapixels and the GR IIIx having 24 megapixels.
The Ricoh GR IIIx has some advantages over the Fujifilm X-E4. It features image stabilization, which the X-E4 lacks. This allows for steadier shots and better performance in low light conditions. Additionally, the GR IIIx has a DXOMARK sensor score of 76, while the X-E4 does not have a DXOMARK score as Fujifilm cameras are not evaluated by the organization. The GR IIIx’s fixed lens mount may be seen as a disadvantage, but it ensures a compact and lightweight design.
On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-E4 has a faster shooting speed of 20 frames per second, compared to the GR IIIx’s 4 frames per second. This makes the X-E4 more suitable for capturing fast-paced action. The X-E4 also has a lens mount, allowing for a wider range of lenses and greater versatility. However, it lacks image stabilization, which may limit its performance in certain situations.
In comparing the optics of these two cameras, the Ricoh GR IIIx offers better image stabilization and a higher DXOMARK sensor score. The Fujifilm X-E4 excels in shooting speed and lens versatility. Both cameras have their unique strengths, and the choice between them will depend on the specific needs of the photographer.
|
Optics
|
Fujifilm X-E4
|
Ricoh GR IIIx
|
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 26 MP | 24 MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 6240 x 4160 px | 6000 x 4000 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 23.5 x 15.6 mm | 23.5 x 15.6 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |  APS-C | APS-C | |
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 20 fps | 4 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Fujifilm X | Fixed | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | X-Processor 4 | GR Engine 6 | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |  3:2 | 3:2 | |
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 160 | 100 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 12,800 | 102,400 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 80 | 100 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 51200 | 102400 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 4 s | 30 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 4000 s | 1/ 4000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 425 | 1 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |   |  | |
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | Electronic | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 2,360,000 dots | N/A |
Fujifilm X-E4 vs Ricoh GR IIIx Video Performance
The Fujifilm X-E4 outperforms the Ricoh GR IIIx in video capabilities, scoring 91/100 compared to the Ricoh’s 70/100. Both cameras share the feature of built-in time-lapse functionality, allowing users to create stunning time-lapse videos with ease.
The Fujifilm X-E4 excels in several key aspects. Firstly, it offers a maximum video resolution of 4K, with dimensions of 4096 x 2160, significantly surpassing the Ricoh GR IIIx’s Full HD resolution of 1920 x 1080. This higher resolution provides users with sharper and more detailed videos. Additionally, the Fujifilm X-E4 boasts a maximum video frame rate of 240fps, quadrupling the Ricoh GR IIIx’s 60fps. This higher frame rate allows for smooth slow-motion footage and reduces motion blur during fast action scenes.
On the other hand, the Ricoh GR IIIx has no specific advantages in its video capabilities compared to the Fujifilm X-E4. Its lower resolution and frame rate limit its potential for producing high-quality videos.
Taking these factors into consideration, the Fujifilm X-E4 clearly outshines the Ricoh GR IIIx in terms of video performance. The X-E4’s superior resolution and frame rate enable users to capture professional-grade videos with ease. Meanwhile, the Ricoh GR IIIx falls short in this area and is not the optimal choice for those prioritizing video capabilities. Therefore, those seeking a camera with excellent video performance should opt for the Fujifilm X-E4, while the Ricoh GR IIIx may be suitable for users with less demanding video requirements.
|
Video
|
Fujifilm X-E4
|
Ricoh GR IIIx
|
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |  4K |  Full HD | |
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 4096 x 2160 px | 1920 x 1080 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 240 p | 60 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |  | | |
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, MOV |
Fujifilm X-E4 vs Ricoh GR IIIx Features and Benefits
The Fujifilm X-E4 wins the feature comparison with a score of 72/100, while the Ricoh GR IIIx scores 70/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as a 3-inch touchscreen, WiFi, and Bluetooth capabilities. Furthermore, neither camera includes GPS functionality.
The Fujifilm X-E4 outperforms the Ricoh GR IIIx in terms of screen resolution and flip screen availability. The X-E4’s screen resolution is 1,620,000 dots, which is significantly higher than the 1,037,000 dots found on the GR IIIx. This difference results in a sharper and clearer display on the X-E4. Moreover, the X-E4 features a flip screen, which provides more flexibility and convenience for various shooting angles, unlike the GR IIIx.
The Ricoh GR IIIx does not excel in any specific feature when compared to the Fujifilm X-E4. Both cameras have similar specifications in most aspects, with the X-E4 having the edge in terms of screen quality and usability.
Considering these factors, the Fujifilm X-E4 offers better features for users, particularly in screen resolution and the addition of a flip screen. The Ricoh GR IIIx, while still a competent camera, does not surpass the X-E4 in any notable aspect. Users seeking a camera with higher screen resolution and a more flexible shooting experience should opt for the Fujifilm X-E4.
|
Features
|
Fujifilm X-E4
|
Ricoh GR IIIx
|
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |  | | |
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |  | | |
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |  | | |
Screen Type | LCD | TFT LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |  | | |
Screen Size |  3" | 3" | |
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 1,620,000 dots | 1,037,000 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |  | | |
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |  | | |
Wi-Fi |  | | |
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |  | | |
Fujifilm X-E4 vs Ricoh GR IIIx Storage and Battery
The Fujifilm X-E4 wins in storage and battery with a score of 35/100, while the Ricoh GR IIIx scores 27/100. Both cameras share common specifications, including one memory card slot, compatibility with SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) memory cards, and USB charging capability.
The X-E4 outperforms the GR IIIx in battery life, offering 380 shots per charge compared to the GR IIIx’s 200 shots. This difference makes the X-E4 more suitable for extended shooting sessions without needing frequent battery replacements or recharging.
The GR IIIx, however, has the advantage of internal storage in addition to its memory card slot. This feature provides extra storage capacity and a backup option for photographers who may run out of space on their memory cards.
In terms of storage and battery, the Fujifilm X-E4 offers better battery life, making it a more reliable choice for extended use. The Ricoh GR IIIx, with its internal storage, offers additional storage flexibility for photographers.
|
Storage and Battery
|
Fujifilm X-E4
|
Ricoh GR IIIx
|
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible), Internal Storage | |
|---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots |  | | |
Battery Type | NP-W126S | DB-110 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 380 shots | 200 shots | |
USB Charging |  | |
|
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Fujifilm X-E4
|
Ricoh GR IIIx
|
|
Scores
|
Fujifilm X-E4
|
Ricoh GR IIIx
|
Fujifilm X-E4 vs Ricoh GR IIIx – Our Verdict
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Fujifilm X-E4 or the Ricoh GR IIIx:
|
User Scores
|
Fujifilm X-E4
|
Ricoh GR IIIx
|
|
B&H photo video | N/A |
|---|