Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony a6400 Comparison
Fujifilm X-H1
Sony a6400
Price | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Brand | Fujifilm | Sony | |
Model | X-H1 | a6400 | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2018 | 2019 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | February 15, 2018 | January 15, 2019 | |
Camera Type |  Mirrorless | Mirrorless | |
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Fujifilm X-H1 takes the lead with a score of 75/100, while the Sony a6400 trails behind at 70/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were released in 2018 and 2019, respectively. They share similarities in their camera types and launch dates, but the differences lie in their specifications.
The Fujifilm X-H1 excels with its larger size (140 x 97 x 86mm) and heavier weight (673g), which may provide better stability and grip for users. It does, however, come at a higher launch price of $1899.
On the other hand, the Sony a6400 is more compact (120 x 67 x 60mm) and lightweight (403g), making it a more portable option. Additionally, its launch price of $900 is significantly lower than the Fujifilm X-H1.
Taking these factors into account, the Fujifilm X-H1’s higher score reflects its perceived better handling and stability, while the Sony a6400 offers a more budget-friendly and portable alternative.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony a6400 Overview and Optics
The Fujifilm X-H1 takes the lead in our optics comparison with a score of 71/100, while the Sony a6400 scores slightly lower at 68/100. Both cameras share some common specifications including 24-megapixel CMOS sensors, APS-C sensor size, and similar lens mounts – Fujifilm X for the X-H1 and Sony E for the a6400.
The Fujifilm X-H1 outperforms the Sony a6400 in several aspects. With a faster shooting speed of 14 frames per second, the X-H1 captures images more rapidly than the a6400’s 11 frames per second. Additionally, the X-H1 features image stabilization, providing steady shots and reducing the risk of blurry images, a feature absent in the a6400. The X-Processor Pro in the X-H1 also ensures optimal performance and image quality.
On the other hand, the Sony a6400 has a slightly higher megapixel count of 24.2, which may result in marginally better image resolution. Furthermore, the a6400’s sensor has a DXOMARK score of 83, providing an objective measure of its performance. However, it is important to note that DXOMARK does not score Fujifilm cameras, so a direct comparison cannot be made in this regard.
In this optics comparison, the Fujifilm X-H1 emerges as the winner due to its faster shooting speed and image stabilization feature. While the Sony a6400 has a marginally higher megapixel count and a DXOMARK score, it lacks image stabilization which is an essential feature for many photographers. Therefore, the Fujifilm X-H1 is the better choice in terms of optics.
|
Optics
|
Fujifilm X-H1
|
Sony a6400
|
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 24 MP | 24.2 MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 6000 x 4000 px | 6000 x 4000 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 23.5 x 15.6 mm | 15.6 x 23.5 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |  APS-C | APS-C | |
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 14 fps | 11 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Fujifilm X | Sony E | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | X-Processor Pro | Bionz X | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |  3:2 | 3:2 | |
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 200 | 100 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 12,800 | 32,000 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 100 | 100 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 51200 | 102400 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 30 s | 30 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 8000 s | 1/ 4000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 325 | 425 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |   |  | |
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | Electronic | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 3,690,000 dots | 2,359,296 dots |
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony a6400 Video Performance
The Sony a6400 outperforms the Fujifilm X-H1 in video capabilities, scoring 91/100 compared to the X-H1’s 83/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as 4K max video resolution and built-in time-lapse functionality. However, there are notable differences that give the a6400 an edge over its competitor.
The Sony a6400 offers a higher max video frame rate of 120fps, while the Fujifilm X-H1 is limited to 60fps. This difference allows the a6400 to capture smoother and more detailed slow-motion footage, providing more creative possibilities for videographers. Additionally, the a6400 has a smaller max video dimension of 3840 x 2160, which may result in faster processing and smaller file sizes.
On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-H1 does have a larger max video dimension of 4096 x 2160, which can provide a slightly wider field of view. However, this advantage is relatively minor compared to the benefits offered by the a6400’s higher frame rate and overall video score.
Taking these factors into account, it is evident that the Sony a6400 is the superior choice for video capabilities. Its higher video score, faster frame rate, and smaller max video dimensions make it a better option for those prioritizing video features in their camera. While the Fujifilm X-H1 does have a marginally larger video dimension, this advantage is outweighed by the a6400’s other benefits.
|
Video
|
Fujifilm X-H1
|
Sony a6400
|
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |  4K | 4K | |
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 4096 x 2160 px | 3840 x 2160 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 60 p | 120 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |  | | |
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MPEG-4, H.264, MOV | MPEG-4, AVCHD Ver. 2.0, XAVC S |
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony a6400 Features and Benefits
The Fujifilm X-H1 outperforms the Sony a6400 in features, with a score of 83/100 compared to the a6400’s 81/100. Both cameras share several similarities in their specifications. They both have 3-inch touchscreens, flip screens, and no GPS. Additionally, both cameras offer WiFi and Bluetooth connectivity.
The Fujifilm X-H1 stands out due to its higher screen resolution of 1,040,000 dots, compared to the Sony a6400’s 921,600 dots. This difference means that the X-H1 provides a clearer and sharper image on its screen, which can be essential for photographers when framing shots or reviewing images on the go.
On the other hand, the Sony a6400 still has some advantages. Although it has a lower feature score, it may excel in other areas such as performance, image quality, or value for money (not covered in this comparison). These factors might make the a6400 a more suitable choice for certain users depending on their specific needs and preferences.
Considering the feature comparison, the Fujifilm X-H1 takes the lead with its higher screen resolution, which contributes to its overall higher feature score. This advantage can be crucial for photographers who prioritize image clarity on their camera screens. However, it is essential to remember that other factors may influence a user’s choice between these two cameras, and the Sony a6400 might still be a strong competitor in those areas. Ultimately, the decision between the Fujifilm X-H1 and Sony a6400 should be based on an individual’s specific requirements and priorities.
|
Features
|
Fujifilm X-H1
|
Sony a6400
|
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |  | | |
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |  | | |
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |  | | |
Screen Type | TFT LCD | LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |  | | |
Screen Size |  3" | 3" | |
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 1,040,000 dots | 921,600 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |  | | |
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |  | | |
Wi-Fi |  | | |
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |  | | |
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony a6400 Storage and Battery
The Fujifilm X-H1 outperforms the Sony a6400 in storage and battery, scoring 68/100, while the Sony a6400 scores 31/100. Both cameras accept SD/SDHC/SDXC memory cards and offer USB charging. However, the Fujifilm X-H1 has two memory card slots, making it more convenient for photographers who need extra storage. The X-H1 also supports faster UHS-II cards, ensuring quicker data transfer.
Despite having a lower score, the Sony a6400 has an advantage in battery life, providing 410 shots per charge compared to the Fujifilm X-H1’s 310 shots. The a6400 also accepts Memory Stick Duo cards, offering an additional storage option.
To sum up, the Fujifilm X-H1 offers better storage capabilities with its dual memory card slots and UHS-II compatibility, while the Sony a6400 has a longer battery life and an extra storage option with Memory Stick Duo compatibility.
|
Storage and Battery
|
Fujifilm X-H1
|
Sony a6400
|
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Duo (UHS-I compatible) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots |  | | |
Battery Type | NP-W126S | NP-FW50 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 310 shots | 410 shots | |
USB Charging |  | |
|
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Fujifilm X-H1
|
Sony a6400
|
|
Overall Score DXOMARK overall sensor score. | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Portrait (Color Depth) As described by DXOMARK 'The Portrait score in our camera sensor reviews defines color depth performance and its unit is a number of bits. A color depth of 22 bits is excellent; differences below 1 bit are barely noticeable.' | N/A | 24 bits | |
Landscape (Dynamic Range) As described by DXOMARK 'The Landscape score in our camera sensor tests defines the maximum dynamic range of the camera sensor and its unit is an exposure value (EV). A value of 12 EV is excellent with differences below 0.5 EV usually not noticeable.' | N/A | 13.6 EVs | |
Sports (Low-Light ISO) Described by DXOMARK as 'The maximal value of ISO sensitivity needed to reach a given value of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The greater the value, the better' | N/A | 1431 |
|
Scores
|
Fujifilm X-H1
|
Sony a6400
|
|
Main Features | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Extra Features | N/A | ||
Construction and Durability | N/A | ||
Handling and Ergonomics | N/A | ||
Value for Money | N/A | ||
Total Score | N/A |
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony a6400 – Our Verdict
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Fujifilm X-H1 or the Sony a6400:
|
User Scores
|
Fujifilm X-H1
|
Sony a6400
|
|
B&H photo video | N/A |
|---|