Fujifilm X-H2S vs X-T3 Comparison

The Fujifilm X-H2S emerges as the winner with a score of 79/100, while the Fujifilm X-T3 trails behind with a score of 72/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and share similar dimensions, with the X-H2S measuring 136 x 93 x 95mm and the X-T3 at 133 x 93 x 59mm.

The X-H2S outshines the X-T3 with its superior performance, justifying its higher launch price of $2500 compared to the X-T3’s $539. However, the X-T3 has a slight advantage in portability, weighing 539g (1.19lbs) compared to the X-H2S’s 660g (1.46lbs).

Considering each camera’s strengths, the Fujifilm X-H2S is the better option for those seeking enhanced performance, while the X-T3 is more suitable for those prioritizing a lighter and more affordable camera.

Fujifilm X-H2S vs X-T3 Overview and Optics

The Fujifilm X-H2S emerges as the winner in the optics comparison with a score of 77/100, while the Fujifilm X-T3 trails behind at 67/100. Both cameras share several common specifications, such as 26 megapixels, a CMOS sensor type, APS-C sensor size, and the Fujifilm X lens mount. DXOMARK does not score Fujifilm cameras, so we cannot compare their sensors based on DXOMARK scores.

The X-H2S outperforms the X-T3 in shooting speed and image stabilization. With a shooting speed of 40, the X-H2S doubles the speed of the X-T3, which has a shooting speed of 20. This faster speed allows photographers to capture more frames in a shorter period, increasing the chances of getting the perfect shot. Additionally, the X-H2S has built-in image stabilization, which the X-T3 lacks. This feature helps reduce camera shake, resulting in sharper images, especially in low-light situations or when using a telephoto lens.

On the other hand, the X-T3 has the advantage of a less advanced processor, the X-Processor 4, compared to the X-H2S’s X-Processor 5. This might make the X-T3 a more budget-friendly option for those who do not require the latest processor technology.

Taking these factors into consideration, the Fujifilm X-H2S stands out as the better choice in terms of optics due to its higher shooting speed and the presence of image stabilization. The Fujifilm X-T3, however, may be a suitable alternative for those seeking a more affordable option without the need for the most advanced processor or image stabilization.

When comparing the video capabilities of the Fujifilm X-H2S and the Fujifilm X-T3, both cameras have the same score of 83/100, indicating that they share similar strengths in this area. They both offer 4K video resolution with a maximum dimension of 4096 x 2160, and a maximum video frame rate of 60fps. Additionally, both cameras have built-in time-lapse functionality.

The Fujifilm X-H2S excels in certain aspects that contribute to its high video score. For example, its autofocus system is fast and accurate, ensuring that video subjects remain in sharp focus throughout the recording. The camera also boasts excellent low-light performance, which allows for better video quality in dimly lit environments. Furthermore, the X-H2S features a robust image stabilization system, which helps reduce camera shake and results in smoother, more professional-looking videos.

While the Fujifilm X-T3 shares the same video score as the X-H2S, it has its own unique strengths. The X-T3 offers a more compact and lighter design, making it easier to carry around and use for extended periods of time. This can be particularly beneficial for videographers who need to move around frequently or travel with their gear. Additionally, the X-T3 has a slightly longer battery life than the X-H2S, allowing for more extended video recording sessions without needing to swap batteries.

Both the Fujifilm X-H2S and X-T3 are strong contenders in the realm of video capabilities. They each have their own advantages, with the X-H2S excelling in autofocus, low-light performance, and image stabilization, while the X-T3 shines with its compact design and longer battery life. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras will come down to individual preferences and priorities, as both offer impressive video performance.

The Fujifilm X-H2S wins the feature comparison with a score of 85/100, while the Fujifilm X-T3 trails closely behind with a score of 83/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, touchscreen capability, flip screen, GPS absence, and both WIFI and Bluetooth connectivity.

The X-H2S outperforms the X-T3 in screen resolution, boasting 1,620,000 dots compared to the X-T3’s 1,040,000 dots. This difference results in a sharper and clearer image display on the X-H2S, making it easier for photographers to review their shots and make necessary adjustments.

On the other hand, the X-T3 does not offer any significant advantages over the X-H2S in terms of features. Both cameras are nearly identical in their offerings, with the primary difference being the higher screen resolution of the X-H2S.

Despite the close scores, the Fujifilm X-H2S emerges as the superior camera in terms of features due to its higher screen resolution. This advantage enhances user experience and aids in capturing better photographs. The Fujifilm X-T3, while still a strong contender, does not provide any notable improvements over the X-H2S in this aspect.

In comparing these two cameras, the Fujifilm X-H2S is the better choice for those who prioritize features, particularly when it comes to screen resolution. The Fujifilm X-T3 remains a viable option for photographers who may not be as concerned with screen resolution differences, as it still offers a robust set of features that align closely with the X-H2S.

The Fujifilm X-H2S outperforms the Fujifilm X-T3 in storage and battery with a score of 76/100, compared to the X-T3’s 68/100. Both cameras have two memory card slots and offer USB charging. The X-H2S accepts CFexpress Type B and SD (UHS-II Compatible) memory cards, while the X-T3 accommodates SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards.

The X-H2S has a superior battery life of 580 shots, using the NP-W235 battery type. In contrast, the X-T3’s battery life reaches only 390 shots with the NP-W126S battery. This difference makes the X-H2S more suitable for extended shooting sessions and reduces the need for frequent battery swaps.

Although the X-T3 has a lower storage and battery score, it still provides adequate performance for most users. Its compatibility with SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards offers a wider range of memory card options.

The Fujifilm X-H2S stands out as the winner in storage and battery capabilities, offering longer battery life and compatibility with high-speed memory cards. The X-T3, while not as strong in this category, still delivers satisfactory performance and memory card flexibility for most photography needs.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Fujifilm X-H2S or the Fujifilm X-T3:

• Fujifilm X-T3 vs X-T4
• Fujifilm X-H2 vs X-H2S
• Fujifilm X-T3 vs X-T30
• Fujifilm X-H2S vs X-T5
• Fujifilm X-H2S vs Sony a7 IV
• Fujifilm X-T3 vs X-T5