Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs X-T30 II Comparison

The Fujifilm X-Pro3 emerges as the winner with a score of 72/100, while the Fujifilm X-T30 II trails behind with 65/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and share similar dimensions, with the X-Pro3 being slightly larger at 141 x 83 x 46mm compared to the X-T30 II’s 118 x 83 x 47mm. The X-Pro3 weighs more at 497g, while the X-T30 II is lighter at 383g.

The X-Pro3 has an advantage due to its higher score, reflecting its superior performance. On the other hand, the X-T30 II has a lower launch price of $899 compared to the X-Pro3’s $1799, making it a more budget-friendly option.

Taking these factors into account, the Fujifilm X-Pro3 is the better camera for those who prioritize performance, while the Fujifilm X-T30 II may be more suitable for those seeking a lighter and more affordable option.

Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs X-T30 II Overview and Optics

The Fujifilm X-Pro3 and Fujifilm X-T30 II both score 67/100 in our optics comparison, indicating that they share many similar features. Both cameras boast 26 megapixels, a CMOS sensor, X-Processor 4, APS-C sensor size, Fujifilm X lens mount, and no image stabilization.

The X-Pro3 excels in shooting speed, offering 11 frames per second (fps) compared to the X-T30 II’s 30 fps. This advantage allows the X-Pro3 to capture fast-moving subjects with greater ease and precision, making it a better choice for action photography or sports events.

On the other hand, the X-T30 II surpasses the X-Pro3 in terms of shooting speed, reaching 30 fps. This higher speed makes the X-T30 II more suitable for capturing quick moments and rapid sequences in various settings, such as wildlife or street photography.

Despite their differences, both cameras maintain the same score in our optics comparison, indicating that each camera’s unique strengths cater to different photography needs. The X-Pro3 is ideal for those seeking a camera with a faster shooting speed, while the X-T30 II is better suited for photographers in need of a higher frame rate. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.

The Fujifilm X-Pro3 and the Fujifilm X-T30 II both receive a video score of 91/100, making them equal in terms of video capabilities. These cameras share several common specifications: a maximum video resolution of 4K, maximum video dimensions of 4096 x 2160, a maximum video frame rate of 120fps, and built-in time-lapse functionality.

Despite having the same video score, there are some aspects where one camera outshines the other. The Fujifilm X-Pro3, for example, offers an advantage in its design, with a unique hybrid viewfinder that allows users to switch between an optical and electronic viewfinder. This feature can be beneficial for videographers who prefer an optical viewfinder for framing their shots, while still having access to an electronic viewfinder for reviewing their footage.

On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-T30 II has its own strengths. It is a more compact and lightweight camera, making it easier to carry and handle during long shooting sessions. Additionally, the X-T30 II has a more affordable price point, making it a more budget-friendly option for those seeking high-quality video capabilities without breaking the bank.

Both cameras are excellent choices for videographers, with identical video scores and shared specifications. The Fujifilm X-Pro3 may be the better choice for those who value the hybrid viewfinder and are willing to invest in the unique design. However, the Fujifilm X-T30 II is the more budget-friendly and portable option, making it ideal for those who prioritize affordability and ease of use. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras will depend on the individual user’s preferences and requirements.

The Fujifilm X-Pro3 wins in the features comparison with a score of 85/100, while the Fujifilm X-T30 II scores 70/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, touchscreen capability, flip screen, GPS absence, and the presence of WIFI and Bluetooth connectivity.

The X-Pro3 outperforms the X-T30 II primarily due to its higher screen resolution of 1,620,000 dots, compared to the X-T30 II’s 1,040,000 dots. This difference results in a sharper and clearer display for the X-Pro3, enhancing the user’s experience when composing shots and reviewing images.

The X-T30 II, despite its lower features score, may still offer advantages over the X-Pro3 in certain situations. For instance, if a user prioritizes budget and does not require the highest screen resolution, the X-T30 II could be a more suitable option. However, based on the given specifications, the X-T30 II does not excel in any particular aspect when compared to the X-Pro3.

Considering the features of both cameras, the Fujifilm X-Pro3 emerges as the superior option due to its higher screen resolution. This advantage contributes to a better user experience, making it the preferred choice for photographers who prioritize image quality and display clarity. On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-T30 II may be a viable choice for those who do not require top-tier screen resolution and are more budget-conscious.

The Fujifilm X-Pro3 outperforms the X-T30 II in storage and battery, scoring 71 out of 100 compared to the X-T30 II’s 35 points. Both cameras share similarities in their specifications, such as using the same battery type (NP-W126S) and offering USB charging.

The X-Pro3 excels with its dual memory card slots, accepting SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards that are UHS-II compatible. This provides more storage capacity and faster data transfer. Additionally, the X-Pro3 has a slightly longer battery life, offering 400 shots per charge compared to the X-T30 II’s 380 shots.

The X-T30 II, while inferior in this aspect, still provides adequate storage and battery performance for casual users. It features one memory card slot, supporting SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards, but only up to UHS-I compatibility.

Considering the storage and battery capabilities, the Fujifilm X-Pro3 stands as the superior choice, especially for professional photographers who require more storage space and longer battery life. However, the X-T30 II remains a viable option for casual users who prioritize affordability and simplicity.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Fujifilm X-Pro3 or the Fujifilm X-T30 II:

• Fujifilm X-T30 vs X-T30 II
• Fujifilm X-S10 vs X-T30 II
• Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs X-T5
• Fujifilm X-T30 II vs X100V
• Fujifilm X-E4 vs X-T30 II
• Fujifilm X-T30 II vs X-T5