Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs X-T4 Comparison

The Fujifilm X-T4 comes out on top with a score of 76/100, while the Fujifilm X-Pro3 scores 72/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were released within a year of each other (X-Pro3 in 2019 and X-T4 in 2020). They share the same launch price range, with the X-Pro3 at $1799 and the X-T4 at $1699.

The X-T4 excels with its more compact size (135 x 93 x 84mm) compared to the X-Pro3 (141 x 83 x 46mm). However, the X-Pro3 has a lighter weight at 497g, while the X-T4 weighs 607g. This difference in weight may be an advantage for the X-Pro3 for those who prioritize portability.

Taking into account these specifications, the Fujifilm X-T4 is the superior choice due to its higher score and compact size, while the X-Pro3 may be preferable for users seeking a lighter camera.

Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs X-T4 Overview and Optics

The Fujifilm X-T4 outperforms the X-Pro3 in optics with a score of 73/100 compared to the X-Pro3’s 67/100. Both cameras share several common specifications, including 26-megapixel resolution, CMOS sensor type, X-Processor 4, APS-C sensor size, and Fujifilm X lens mount. Neither camera has a DXOMARK score, as Fujifilm cameras are not scored by DXOMARK.

The X-T4 excels in shooting speed and image stabilization. With a shooting speed of 20 frames per second (fps), the X-T4 is significantly faster than the X-Pro3’s 11 fps. This difference allows the X-T4 to capture fast-moving subjects with greater ease. Additionally, the X-T4 features built-in image stabilization, which the X-Pro3 lacks. This advantage enables the X-T4 to produce sharper images in low light conditions and when using slower shutter speeds.

Although the X-Pro3 falls behind in shooting speed and image stabilization, it still offers a high-quality photography experience. Its 26-megapixel resolution and X-Processor 4 provide excellent image quality, while the APS-C sensor size ensures a good balance between image quality and portability. Furthermore, the Fujifilm X lens mount allows compatibility with a wide range of lenses, offering versatility in various shooting situations.

To conclude, the Fujifilm X-T4 is the superior camera in terms of optics due to its faster shooting speed and built-in image stabilization. However, the X-Pro3 remains a solid choice for photographers who prioritize image quality and lens compatibility. Ultimately, the decision between the two cameras depends on the individual photographer’s needs and preferences.

The Fujifilm X-Pro3 and the Fujifilm X-T4 both have a video score of 91/100, indicating that these cameras perform similarly in terms of video capabilities. They share common specs, such as a max video resolution of 4K, max video dimensions of 4096 x 2160, and a max video frame rate of 120fps. Additionally, both cameras have time-lapse functionality built in.

Despite having the same video score, the X-Pro3 is better in some aspects. The X-Pro3 is known for its excellent color rendition, making it suitable for videographers who need accurate color representation. The camera also has a unique hybrid optical and electronic viewfinder, which allows users to switch between the two for different shooting situations. This feature is particularly useful for video recording, as it provides flexibility in framing and focusing.

On the other hand, the X-T4 has its own advantages. It features in-body image stabilization (IBIS), which is an essential feature for shooting smooth and stable videos. The X-T4 also has a fully articulating touchscreen, making it easier for users to shoot videos from various angles and monitor their footage while recording. Additionally, the X-T4 has a dedicated movie mode, allowing users to quickly switch between photo and video settings.

Taking these points into consideration, it is evident that both cameras have their own strengths and weaknesses. The X-Pro3 excels in color rendition and viewfinder options, while the X-T4 offers better stabilization and ease of use for video recording. Users should choose the camera that best suits their specific needs and preferences when it comes to video capabilities.

The Fujifilm X-Pro3 and Fujifilm X-T4 share an identical feature score of 85/100, indicating that both cameras offer a similar level of functionality. They have several specifications in common, including a 3-inch screen size, a screen resolution of 1620000 dots, a touchscreen, a flip screen, and the absence of GPS. Additionally, both cameras are equipped with WIFI and Bluetooth capabilities.

Despite their equal scores, the Fujifilm X-Pro3 has certain advantages over the X-T4. The X-Pro3’s design is more compact and lightweight, making it a better choice for photographers who value portability and ease of use. The X-Pro3 also features a unique hybrid viewfinder, which allows users to switch between optical and electronic viewfinders, depending on their preferences and shooting conditions. This versatility can be particularly useful for street and documentary photographers who require flexibility in their gear.

On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-T4 has its own set of strengths. The X-T4 boasts improved image stabilization, which can help photographers capture sharper images in challenging lighting conditions or when using longer lenses. Furthermore, the X-T4 has a faster continuous shooting speed, enabling users to capture fast-moving subjects with greater accuracy.

Considering these differences, the Fujifilm X-Pro3 may be more suitable for photographers who prioritize a compact design and a versatile viewfinder, while the X-T4 may appeal to those who need advanced image stabilization and faster continuous shooting capabilities. Ultimately, both cameras offer a strong set of features, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the individual photographer.

The Fujifilm X-T4 outperforms the X-Pro3 in storage and battery with a score of 73/100, compared to the X-Pro3’s 71/100. Both cameras have two memory card slots and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC (UHS-II compatible) cards. Additionally, they both feature USB charging capabilities.

The X-T4 surpasses the X-Pro3 in battery life, offering 500 shots per charge with its NP-W235 battery, while the X-Pro3 provides 400 shots using the NP-W126S battery. This gives the X-T4 a clear advantage for extended shooting sessions.

The X-Pro3, however, does not possess any specific advantages over the X-T4 in terms of storage and battery. Its slightly lower score reflects its shorter battery life.

Considering these aspects, the Fujifilm X-T4 is the superior choice for photographers seeking longer battery life and reliable storage performance. The X-Pro3 remains a solid option, but the X-T4’s enhanced battery life sets it apart.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Fujifilm X-Pro3 or the Fujifilm X-T4:

• Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
• Fujifilm X-T4 vs X-T5
• Fujifilm X-T3 vs X-T4
• Fujifilm X-T4 vs Nikon Z9
• Fujifilm X-S10 vs X-T4
• Fujifilm X-T4 vs Sony a7R IV