Fujifilm X-T2 vs Sony a6500 Comparison

The Sony a6500 edges out the Fujifilm X-T2 with a score of 72/100 compared to 68/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were released in 2016, with the X-T2 priced at $1599 and the a6500 at $1400. They share similar dimensions, with the X-T2 measuring 133 x 92 x 49mm and weighing 507g, while the a6500 is slightly smaller and lighter at 120 x 67 x 53mm and 453g.

The Fujifilm X-T2 has some advantages, such as a slightly larger body that may provide a better grip for users. However, the Sony a6500 is the better camera due to its higher score, which is a result of its superior performance and features. The a6500’s smaller size and lighter weight also make it more portable and convenient to carry around.

Considering the specifications and scores, the Sony a6500 is the clear winner in this comparison, offering better performance and a more compact design at a lower price point.

Fujifilm X-T2 vs Sony a6500 Overview and Optics

The Sony a6500 wins the optics comparison with a score of 74/100, while the Fujifilm X-T2 scores 66/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as 24-megapixel CMOS sensors, APS-C sensor size, and similar processors (X-Processor Pro for Fujifilm and Bionz X for Sony).

The Sony a6500 outperforms the Fujifilm X-T2 in several aspects. With 24.2 megapixels, it has a slightly higher resolution than the X-T2’s 24 megapixels. The a6500 also has a DXOMARK sensor score of 85, while the X-T2 does not have a DXOMARK score. Additionally, the Sony a6500 features image stabilization, which the Fujifilm X-T2 lacks. This advantage makes the a6500 more suitable for shooting in low light conditions and capturing sharper images while using slower shutter speeds.

However, the Fujifilm X-T2 has a faster shooting speed of 14 frames per second, compared to the Sony a6500’s 11 frames per second. This makes the X-T2 more suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects and action shots, such as sports and wildlife photography.

In terms of optics, the Sony a6500 is the better choice for photographers who prioritize image stabilization and a higher DXOMARK sensor score. On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-T2 is more suitable for those who need a faster shooting speed for action photography. The choice between the two cameras ultimately depends on the specific needs and preferences of the photographer.

The Fujifilm X-T2 outperforms the Sony a6500 in video capabilities with a score of 83/100 compared to the Sony’s 77/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as the maximum video resolution of 4K and maximum video dimensions of 3840 x 2160.

The Fujifilm X-T2 stands out with its higher video frame rate of 60fps and built-in time-lapse functionality. This means that the X-T2 can capture smoother video, particularly in fast-paced situations or when filming sports and action scenes. The built-in time-lapse feature also provides an added creative option for videographers, allowing them to easily create stunning time-lapse sequences without the need for additional equipment or software.

On the other hand, the Sony a6500 offers a higher maximum video frame rate of 120fps, which can be beneficial for capturing slow-motion footage. However, this advantage is somewhat diminished by the lack of built-in time-lapse functionality, which may require users to invest in additional equipment or software to achieve similar results.

Taking these factors into consideration, the Fujifilm X-T2 proves to be a more versatile and powerful video tool, with its higher overall video score, 60fps frame rate, and built-in time-lapse functionality. While the Sony a6500 has the advantage of a higher maximum frame rate for slow-motion capture, the absence of built-in time-lapse features makes it a less comprehensive option for videographers.

The Sony a6500 comes out on top in this comparison with a feature score of 81/100, while the Fujifilm X-T2 trails behind at 70/100. Both cameras share several specifications, making them comparable in some aspects. They both have a 3-inch screen, a flip screen, no GPS, and are equipped with WIFI and Bluetooth capabilities.

The Sony a6500 surpasses the Fujifilm X-T2 in its touchscreen feature and screen resolution. The a6500’s touchscreen allows for easier navigation and control, providing a more user-friendly experience. Moreover, the screen resolution of the a6500 is 921,600 dots, which is higher than the X-T2’s 1,040,000 dots, resulting in a sharper and more detailed display.

The Fujifilm X-T2, though not the winner, has its own merits. The X-T2 has a higher screen resolution, which means it can display more details on its screen. This can be helpful for photographers who want to review their images with greater accuracy. However, this advantage is not enough to surpass the overall features of the Sony a6500.

Taking all the factors into account, the Sony a6500 proves to be a better camera in terms of features. Its touchscreen and higher screen resolution set it apart from the Fujifilm X-T2, making it a more convenient and versatile option for photographers. Despite the X-T2’s higher screen resolution, it falls short in comparison to the a6500’s comprehensive features.

The Fujifilm X-T2 outperforms the Sony a6500 in storage and battery with a score of 68/100 compared to 21/100. Both cameras accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards, but the X-T2 has two memory card slots while the a6500 has only one. Additionally, the X-T2 is compatible with UHS-II cards for faster data transfer.

The X-T2 also has a slight advantage in battery life, offering 340 shots per charge compared to the a6500’s 350 shots. The Fujifilm X-T2 uses the NP-W126S battery, which supports USB charging, while the Sony a6500 uses the NP-FW50 battery without USB charging capabilities.

Despite the lower score, the Sony a6500 has the advantage of accepting Memory Stick Pro Duo cards in addition to the common SD card format. However, this benefit is not significant enough to outweigh the advantages of the Fujifilm X-T2 in terms of storage and battery performance.

As a result, the Fujifilm X-T2 is the better choice for photographers who prioritize storage capacity and battery life, while the Sony a6500 remains a viable option for those who value compatibility with Memory Stick Pro Duo cards.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Fujifilm X-T2 or the Sony a6500:

• Fujifilm X-T2 vs X-T5
• Sony a6400 vs a6500
• Sony a6500 vs a7S II
• Sony a6500 vs a6600
• Sony a6500 vs a7 III
• Sony a6300 vs a6500