Fujifilm X-T2 vs Sony a7R III Comparison
Fujifilm X-T2
Sony a7R III
Price | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Brand | Fujifilm | Sony | |
Model | X-T2 | a7R III | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2016 | 2017 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | July 09, 2016 | October 25, 2017 | |
Camera Type |  Mirrorless | Mirrorless | |
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Sony a7R III outperforms the Fujifilm X-T2 with a score of 83/100 compared to 68/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were released in 2016 and 2017, respectively. They share similarities in camera size, with the Fujifilm X-T2 measuring 133 x 92 x 49mm and the Sony a7R III at 127 x 96 x 74mm.
The Sony a7R III excels with a higher score, but it also comes with a heftier launch price of $3200 compared to the Fujifilm X-T2’s $1599. The Sony a7R III is heavier, weighing 657g, while the Fujifilm X-T2 weighs 507g.
Despite the price and weight differences, the Sony a7R III’s higher score justifies its advantages, making it a superior choice. However, the Fujifilm X-T2 is a more budget-friendly and lightweight option for those prioritizing these factors.
Fujifilm X-T2 vs Sony a7R III Overview and Optics
The Sony a7R III outperforms the Fujifilm X-T2 in optics with a score of 84/100, an 18-point lead over the X-T2’s 66/100. Both cameras share common features, such as CMOS sensors and lens mounts specific to their respective brands. However, the Sony a7R III surpasses the Fujifilm X-T2 in several aspects, while the X-T2 holds its own in a few areas.
The Sony a7R III boasts a higher megapixel count at 42.4, compared to the X-T2’s 24. Additionally, the a7R III has a full-frame sensor, providing better image quality and low-light performance than the X-T2’s APS-C sensor. The a7R III’s sensor also received a DXOMARK score of 100, a testament to its superior performance. Furthermore, the a7R III features image stabilization, which the X-T2 lacks, allowing for sharper images in low-light conditions and during handheld shooting.
On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-T2 has a faster shooting speed of 14 frames per second, compared to the Sony a7R III’s 10. This gives the X-T2 an edge in capturing fast-moving subjects and action scenes. However, this advantage is not enough to make up for the overall inferior optics compared to the Sony a7R III.
In terms of optics, the Sony a7R III is the clear winner. Its higher megapixel count, full-frame sensor, and image stabilization contribute to its superior performance. While the Fujifilm X-T2’s faster shooting speed is commendable, it does not compensate for the gap in optical quality. Photographers seeking the best optics should opt for the Sony a7R III, while those who prioritize shooting speed may still find value in the Fujifilm X-T2.
|
Optics
|
Fujifilm X-T2
|
Sony a7R III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 24 MP | 42.4 MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 6000 x 4000 px | 7952 x 5304 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 23.6 x 15.6 mm | 24 x 35.9 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |  APS-C |  Full Frame | |
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 14 fps | 10 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Fujifilm X | Sony FE | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | X-Processor Pro | Bionz X | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |  3:2 | 3:2 | |
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 200 | 100 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 12,800 | 32,000 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 100 | 50 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 51200 | 102400 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 30 s | 30 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 8000 s | 1/ 8000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 325 | 425 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |   |  | |
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | Electronic | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 2,360,000 dots | 3,686,400 dots |
Fujifilm X-T2 vs Sony a7R III Video Performance
The Fujifilm X-T2 outperforms the Sony a7R III in video capabilities with a score of 83/100, a significant 27-point lead over the Sony a7R III’s 56/100. Both cameras have a maximum video resolution of 4K and video dimensions of 3840 x 2160, providing high-quality footage. However, the differences in their video features set them apart.
The Fujifilm X-T2 surpasses the Sony a7R III in terms of maximum video frame rate, offering 60fps compared to the Sony a7R III’s 30fps. This allows the Fujifilm X-T2 to capture smoother, more detailed video, particularly in fast-moving scenes or when recording sports and action. Additionally, the Fujifilm X-T2 has built-in time-lapse functionality, enabling users to create stunning time-lapse videos without needing external accessories or software.
On the other hand, the Sony a7R III’s lower video score does not mean it lacks quality. It still offers 4K resolution and 3840 x 2160 video dimensions, ensuring high-definition footage. However, its lower maximum video frame rate of 30fps and lack of built-in time-lapse functionality make it less versatile than the Fujifilm X-T2 for video enthusiasts.
In comparing the video capabilities of these two cameras, the Fujifilm X-T2 emerges as the superior choice due to its higher video score, faster maximum video frame rate, and built-in time-lapse functionality. The Sony a7R III, while still offering high-quality video, falls short in versatility and advanced video features. For users prioritizing video capabilities, the Fujifilm X-T2 is the recommended choice.
|
Video
|
Fujifilm X-T2
|
Sony a7R III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |  4K | 4K | |
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 3840 x 2160 px | 3840 x 2160 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 60 p | 30 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |  | | |
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MPEG-4, MOV | XAVC S, AVCHD Ver. 2.0, MP4 |
Fujifilm X-T2 vs Sony a7R III Features and Benefits
The Sony a7R III outperforms the Fujifilm X-T2 in features, scoring 83 out of 100 points compared to the X-T2’s 70 points. Both cameras share some specifications, such as a 3-inch screen size, flip screen, and the absence of GPS. They also both offer WiFi and Bluetooth connectivity.
The Sony a7R III stands out with its higher screen resolution of 1,440,000 dots, providing clearer and more detailed image previews. Additionally, the a7R III has a touchscreen, which allows for easier navigation and access to settings compared to the X-T2, which lacks this feature.
The Fujifilm X-T2, despite its lower score, may still offer advantages in specific situations. For example, some photographers may prefer the X-T2’s unique design and aesthetic or its compatibility with Fujifilm’s renowned X-series lenses. However, these factors do not significantly impact the camera’s features, as reflected in its lower score.
In comparing the features of the Fujifilm X-T2 and the Sony a7R III, the Sony a7R III is the clear winner due to its superior screen resolution and touchscreen capabilities. While the Fujifilm X-T2 may have its unique appeal, the Sony a7R III offers better functionality and user experience in terms of features.
|
Features
|
Fujifilm X-T2
|
Sony a7R III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |  | | |
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |  | | |
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |  | | |
Screen Type | TFT LCD | LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |  | | |
Screen Size |  3" | 3" | |
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 1,040,000 dots | 1,440,000 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |  | | |
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |  | | |
Wi-Fi |  | | |
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |  | | |
Fujifilm X-T2 vs Sony a7R III Storage and Battery
The Fujifilm X-T2 slightly outperforms the Sony a7R III in storage and battery with a score of 68/100 compared to 65/100. Both cameras have two memory card slots and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards (UHS-II compatible).
The X-T2 has an edge with its USB charging capability, which the a7R III lacks. This feature allows for more convenient charging options during travel or extended use. However, the X-T2 has a shorter battery life of 340 shots, using the NP-W126S battery type.
On the other hand, the Sony a7R III boasts an impressive battery life of 650 shots, almost double that of the X-T2, using the NP-FZ100 battery type. This advantage makes it ideal for longer shooting sessions without frequent battery swaps.
Taking these factors into account, the Fujifilm X-T2 excels in charging convenience, while the Sony a7R III shines in battery longevity.
|
Storage and Battery
|
Fujifilm X-T2
|
Sony a7R III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots |  | | |
Battery Type | NP-W126S | NP-FZ100 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 340 shots | 650 shots | |
USB Charging |  | |
|
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Fujifilm X-T2
|
Sony a7R III
|
|
Overall Score DXOMARK overall sensor score. | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Portrait (Color Depth) As described by DXOMARK 'The Portrait score in our camera sensor reviews defines color depth performance and its unit is a number of bits. A color depth of 22 bits is excellent; differences below 1 bit are barely noticeable.' | N/A | 26 bits | |
Landscape (Dynamic Range) As described by DXOMARK 'The Landscape score in our camera sensor tests defines the maximum dynamic range of the camera sensor and its unit is an exposure value (EV). A value of 12 EV is excellent with differences below 0.5 EV usually not noticeable.' | N/A | 14.7 EVs | |
Sports (Low-Light ISO) Described by DXOMARK as 'The maximal value of ISO sensitivity needed to reach a given value of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The greater the value, the better' | N/A | 3523 |
|
Scores
|
Fujifilm X-T2
|
Sony a7R III
|
Fujifilm X-T2 vs Sony a7R III – Our Verdict
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Fujifilm X-T2 or the Sony a7R III:
|
User Scores
|
Fujifilm X-T2
|
Sony a7R III
|
|
B&H photo video | N/A |
|---|