Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony a6400 Comparison

The Sony a6400 outperforms the Fujifilm X-T200 with a score of 70/100 compared to 66/100. Both mirrorless cameras share similarities, such as their release years (2019 for Sony and 2020 for Fujifilm) and compact sizes (120 x 67 x 60mm for Sony and 121 x 84 x 55mm for Fujifilm). The Sony a6400 excels with its higher score, despite its slightly higher launch price of $900 compared to Fujifilm’s $699.

On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-T200 has the advantage of being lighter, weighing only 370g (0.82lbs) compared to the Sony a6400’s 403g (0.89lbs). Each camera has its strengths, with the Sony a6400 offering better overall performance and the Fujifilm X-T200 providing a more budget-friendly and lightweight option.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony a6400 Overview and Optics

The Sony a6400 outperforms the Fujifilm X-T200 in optics with a score of 68/100 compared to the X-T200’s 67/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, including 24-megapixel sensors, CMOS sensor type, APS-C sensor size, and a similar lens mount (Fujifilm X and Sony E, respectively).

The Sony a6400’s superior performance is evident in its higher shooting speed of 11 frames per second (fps), compared to the X-T200’s 8 fps. Additionally, the a6400 is equipped with a Bionz X processor, while the X-T200’s processor remains unspecified. The a6400 also boasts a DXOMARK sensor score of 83, which is not available for Fujifilm cameras.

On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-T200 has an advantage in image stabilization, a feature absent in the Sony a6400. This can be beneficial for photographers who frequently shoot handheld or in low-light situations, as image stabilization helps to minimize camera shake and produce sharper images.

Despite the slight edge in overall optics score, the Sony a6400 and Fujifilm X-T200 both have their strengths and weaknesses. The a6400 excels in shooting speed and processor power, making it a better choice for action and sports photography. However, the X-T200’s image stabilization offers an advantage for those who require steadier shots. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the photographer.

The Fujifilm X-T200 and the Sony a6400 both receive a video score of 91/100, indicating that these cameras have comparable video capabilities. They share several key specifications, such as a maximum video resolution of 4K, video dimensions of 3840 x 2160, a maximum video frame rate of 120fps, and built-in time-lapse functionality.

Despite their identical scores, the Fujifilm X-T200 has some advantages over the Sony a6400. One of its strengths is its user-friendly interface, making it easier for beginners to navigate and operate the camera. Additionally, the X-T200 is known for its excellent color reproduction, which can result in more vibrant and true-to-life footage.

On the other hand, the Sony a6400 has its own merits. It is renowned for its fast and accurate autofocus system, which can be crucial for capturing sharp and clear video footage. Furthermore, the a6400 is known for its low-light performance, enabling users to shoot in dimly lit environments with better results.

Taking these factors into account, the Fujifilm X-T200 is an ideal choice for users who prioritize ease of use and accurate color reproduction in their video footage. The Sony a6400, meanwhile, is better suited for those who require fast and precise autofocus, as well as improved low-light performance. Both cameras offer impressive video capabilities, and the choice ultimately depends on the specific needs and preferences of the user.

The Sony a6400 wins in the features comparison, scoring 81/100, while the Fujifilm X-T200 scores 74/100. Both cameras share several common specifications, such as having a touchscreen, flip screen, WiFi, and Bluetooth connectivity. Neither camera has GPS functionality.

The Sony a6400 outperforms the Fujifilm X-T200 in terms of features due to several reasons. First, the a6400 has a higher feature score, indicating that it offers more advanced and versatile options for photographers. Second, the a6400 has a slightly smaller screen size of 3 inches compared to the X-T200’s 3.5 inches. This difference may make the a6400 more compact and easier to carry around during photography sessions.

On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-T200 has a higher screen resolution of 2,780,000 dots compared to the Sony a6400’s 921,600 dots. This higher resolution means that the X-T200 provides a clearer and more detailed image preview, which can lead to better composition and focus decisions while shooting.

In terms of features, the Sony a6400 is the better camera due to its higher score and more advanced options. However, the Fujifilm X-T200’s higher screen resolution offers an advantage in image preview quality. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras will depend on the individual photographer’s needs and preferences, weighing the importance of advanced features against the benefits of a higher-resolution screen.

The Sony a6400 outperforms the Fujifilm X-T200 in storage and battery with a score of 37 to 29. Both cameras have one memory card slot and are compatible with SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards (UHS-I compatible). Additionally, both cameras offer USB charging.

The a6400 has a longer battery life of 410 shots, compared to the X-T200’s 270 shots. This extended battery life makes the Sony a6400 more suitable for longer shooting sessions. Moreover, the a6400 accepts Memory Stick Duo cards, providing users with more storage options.

The Fujifilm X-T200 does not have any notable advantages in storage and battery over the Sony a6400. Thus, the Sony a6400 is the superior choice in terms of storage and battery performance, offering longer battery life and increased storage compatibility.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Fujifilm X-T200 or the Sony a6400:

• Nikon Z50 vs Sony a6400
• Sony a6400 vs a6600
• Nikon Z30 vs Sony a6400
• Sony a6400 vs a7 II
• Fujifilm X-S10 vs Sony a6400
• Sony a6100 vs a6400