Fujifilm X-T3 vs Sony a6400 Comparison

The Fujifilm X-T3 edges out the Sony a6400 by a narrow margin, scoring 72/100 compared to the Sony’s 70/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were introduced just a few months apart, with the Fujifilm X-T3 in 2018 and Sony a6400 in 2019. They share similar dimensions, though the Sony a6400 is slightly smaller and lighter, weighing 403g compared to the Fujifilm X-T3’s 539g.

The Fujifilm X-T3 has a lower launch price of $539, making it more affordable than the Sony a6400, which debuted at $900. This price difference gives the Fujifilm X-T3 an advantage for budget-conscious buyers. On the other hand, the Sony a6400’s compact size and lighter weight make it more portable and easier to carry around.

Taking these factors into account, the Fujifilm X-T3 is a better value for the money, while the Sony a6400 offers greater portability. Both cameras have their strengths, and the choice between them ultimately depends on individual preferences and priorities.

Fujifilm X-T3 vs Sony a6400 Overview and Optics

The Sony a6400 triumphs over the Fujifilm X-T3 in optics with a score of 68/100, just one point ahead of the X-T3’s 67/100. Both cameras have several specifications in common, such as the CMOS sensor type, APS-C sensor size, and the absence of image stabilization. They also share similar lens mounts, with the Fujifilm X-T3 using the Fujifilm X mount and the Sony a6400 using the Sony E mount.

The Fujifilm X-T3 excels in certain aspects, such as having a higher megapixel count of 26 compared to the Sony a6400’s 24.2. This allows for capturing more detail in images. Furthermore, the X-T3 has a superior shooting speed of 20, which is almost twice as fast as the a6400’s 11, making it more suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects.

On the other hand, the Sony a6400 has a DXOMARK sensor score of 83, which gives it an edge in terms of image quality. The Fujifilm X-T3 does not have a DXOMARK score, as the organization does not score Fujifilm cameras. Additionally, the a6400 is equipped with the Bionz X processor, while the X-T3 uses the X-Processor 4. Both processors are advanced and efficient, but the Bionz X is known for its excellent noise reduction capabilities.

Taking these factors into account, the Sony a6400 has a slight advantage in terms of optics, mainly attributed to its DXOMARK score and noise reduction capabilities. However, the Fujifilm X-T3 does not lag far behind, offering a higher megapixel count and faster shooting speed. Ultimately, the choice between the two cameras depends on the specific needs and preferences of the photographer.

The Sony a6400 emerges as the winner in the video department with a score of 91/100, while the Fujifilm X-T3 trails behind with a score of 83/100. Both cameras share common features, such as 4K video resolution and built-in time-lapse functionality. However, the differences in their capabilities are what sets them apart.

The Sony a6400 boasts a higher maximum video frame rate of 120fps compared to the Fujifilm X-T3’s 60fps. This advantage allows the a6400 to capture smoother slow-motion footage and provides more flexibility in post-production. Additionally, the a6400 has a smaller video dimension of 3840 x 2160, which makes it easier to edit and store footage without compromising quality.

On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-T3 has a larger video dimension at 4096 x 2160, offering a slightly wider aspect ratio for more cinematic footage. However, this advantage comes with the trade-off of larger file sizes and potentially more challenging editing workflows.

In terms of video capabilities, the Sony a6400 takes the lead due to its higher frame rate, offering greater versatility for videographers. The Fujifilm X-T3, while still a strong contender, falls short in this aspect. That being said, the X-T3’s larger video dimension may appeal to those seeking a more cinematic look.

Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on the specific needs of the user. The Sony a6400 is the superior option for those prioritizing smooth slow-motion footage and easier editing, while the Fujifilm X-T3 might be better suited for users who prefer a wider aspect ratio for their videos.

The Fujifilm X-T3 emerges as the winner in the features comparison with a score of 83/100, slightly ahead of the Sony a6400, which scores 81/100. Both cameras share several specifications, making them closely matched in terms of features.

Both the Fujifilm X-T3 and Sony a6400 have 3-inch screens, touchscreens, flip screens, and lack GPS. They also both include WIFI and Bluetooth capabilities. This shows that both cameras are designed with modern connectivity and user experience in mind.

The Fujifilm X-T3 outperforms the Sony a6400 in screen resolution, offering 1,040,000 dots compared to the Sony’s 921,600 dots. This higher resolution provides a clearer and more detailed image preview and playback experience for the user, making it easier to assess image quality and focus on the X-T3.

Despite its slightly lower feature score, the Sony a6400 still holds its own in this comparison. Its features are almost on par with the Fujifilm X-T3, and the difference in screen resolution may not be a deciding factor for many users. The a6400 is still a strong contender with its set of features and capabilities.

In comparing these two cameras, the Fujifilm X-T3 has a slight advantage in terms of features, mainly due to its higher screen resolution. However, the Sony a6400 remains a competitive choice with its similar set of features. Ultimately, the decision between these two cameras will depend on the user’s preferences and priorities regarding features and overall camera performance.

The Fujifilm X-T3 wins the storage and battery comparison with a score of 68/100, while the Sony a6400 scores 37/100. Both cameras have USB charging and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards. However, the X-T3 stands out with its dual memory card slots, offering more storage flexibility compared to the a6400’s single slot.

The Sony a6400 has a slightly longer battery life of 410 shots, as opposed to the X-T3’s 390 shots. Despite this advantage, the X-T3 still scores higher due to its superior overall storage capabilities and battery features. The X-T3 uses the NP-W126S battery, while the a6400 uses the NP-FW50 battery.

Considering the storage and battery aspects, the Fujifilm X-T3 is the better choice for photographers who prioritize storage flexibility and battery features. The Sony a6400 may be suitable for those who value a slightly longer battery life, but it falls short in other aspects compared to the X-T3.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Fujifilm X-T3 or the Sony a6400:

• Nikon Z50 vs Sony a6400
• Sony a6400 vs a6600
• Nikon Z30 vs Sony a6400
• Sony a6400 vs a7 II
• Fujifilm X-S10 vs Sony a6400
• Sony a6100 vs a6400