Fujifilm X-T3 vs Sony a7 II Comparison
Fujifilm X-T3
Sony a7 II
Price | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Brand | Fujifilm | Sony | |
Model | X-T3 | a7 II | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2018 | 2014 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | September 06, 2018 | November 20, 2014 | |
Camera Type |  Mirrorless | Mirrorless | |
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Fujifilm X-T3 outperforms the Sony a7 II with a score of 72/100 compared to 69/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were released in 2018 and 2014, respectively. They share similarities in size, with the X-T3 measuring 133 x 93 x 59mm and the a7 II at 127 x 96 x 60mm.
The X-T3 excels with its lighter weight of 539g, compared to the a7 II’s 599g, making it more comfortable for extended use. Additionally, the X-T3’s launch price of $539 is significantly lower than the a7 II’s $1600, making it a more affordable option.
On the other hand, the Sony a7 II may offer advantages in specific features not mentioned in the general specifications. However, based on the information provided, the Fujifilm X-T3 is the superior choice due to its higher score, lighter weight, and more budget-friendly price.
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Sony a7 II Overview and Optics
The Sony a7 II takes the lead in our optics comparison with a score of 78/100, while the Fujifilm X-T3 trails with a score of 67/100. Both cameras share common specifications, including a CMOS sensor, and compatibility with their respective lens mounts – Fujifilm X for the X-T3 and Sony E for the a7 II.
The Sony a7 II excels due to its full-frame sensor, which provides better image quality and low-light performance compared to the Fujifilm X-T3’s APS-C sensor. Moreover, the a7 II boasts a DXOMARK score of 90, validating the superiority of its sensor, while the X-T3 lacks a DXOMARK score. Another advantage of the Sony a7 II is its built-in image stabilization, which helps in reducing camera shake and producing sharper images.
On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-T3 has a higher megapixel count of 26, compared to the Sony a7 II’s 24.2 megapixels, allowing for slightly more detailed images. Additionally, the X-T3 outperforms the a7 II in shooting speed, with an impressive 20 frames per second compared to the a7 II’s 5 frames per second. This makes the Fujifilm X-T3 more suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects.
While the Fujifilm X-T3 has its advantages in megapixels and shooting speed, the Sony a7 II’s full-frame sensor and image stabilization make it a better choice for photographers prioritizing image quality and low-light performance. Consequently, the Sony a7 II’s higher score reflects its superior optical performance in these crucial aspects.
|
Optics
|
Fujifilm X-T3
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 26 MP | 24.3 MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 6240 x 4160 px | 6000 x 4000 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 23.5 x 15.6 mm | 23.9 x 35.8 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |  APS-C |  Full Frame | |
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 20 fps | 5 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Fujifilm X | Sony E | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | X-Processor 4 | Bionz X | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |  3:2 | 3:2 | |
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 160 | 50 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 12,800 | 51,200 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 80 | 50 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 51200 | 51200 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 30 s | 30 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 8000 s | 1/ 8000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 425 | 117 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |   |  | |
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | Electronic | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 3,690,000 dots | 2,359,000 dots |
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Sony a7 II Video Performance
The Fujifilm X-T3 outperforms the Sony a7 II in video capabilities with a score of 83/100, a 27-point difference compared to the Sony’s 56/100 score. Both cameras share some common specifications, including a maximum video frame rate of 60fps.
The Fujifilm X-T3 excels with its 4K video resolution and dimensions of 4096 x 2160, offering superior image quality and detail compared to the Sony a7 II, which has a Full HD video resolution and dimensions of 1920 x 1080. Additionally, the X-T3 has built-in time-lapse functionality, providing more creative options for filmmakers and photographers.
The Sony a7 II, while lacking in video resolution and time-lapse functionality, still performs well with its 60fps frame rate, allowing for smooth motion capture in Full HD. This may be sufficient for users who do not require the higher resolution offered by the Fujifilm X-T3.
Considering these factors, the Fujifilm X-T3 is the clear winner in terms of video capabilities, with its higher resolution and added time-lapse feature. The Sony a7 II, on the other hand, is a viable option for those who prioritize other aspects of a camera and do not require 4K video resolution.
|
Video
|
Fujifilm X-T3
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |  4K |  Full HD | |
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 4096 x 2160 px | 1920 x 1080 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 60 p | 60 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |  | | |
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MPEG-4, MOV | XAVC S |
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Sony a7 II Features and Benefits
The Fujifilm X-T3 emerges as the superior camera with a feature score of 83/100, significantly higher than the Sony a7 II’s score of 57/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as a 3-inch screen size, flip screen, absence of GPS, and WIFI connectivity.
The Fujifilm X-T3 outperforms the Sony a7 II in several aspects. Firstly, it has a touchscreen, which the Sony a7 II lacks. This makes navigating menus and settings more convenient and user-friendly. Secondly, the X-T3 has Bluetooth connectivity, enabling seamless and fast file transfers between devices, compared to the a7 II’s absence of Bluetooth.
Despite its lower feature score, the Sony a7 II does have an advantage in screen resolution. With 1,230,000 dots, it offers a slightly sharper display than the Fujifilm X-T3’s 1,040,000 dots. This can be beneficial for photographers who need to review images with more detail on the camera’s screen.
Taking these points into consideration, the Fujifilm X-T3 boasts a more comprehensive set of features, particularly with its touchscreen and Bluetooth capabilities. These enhancements contribute to the higher feature score and make it a more versatile and user-friendly option. On the other hand, the Sony a7 II’s higher screen resolution might appeal to photographers who prioritize image clarity on the camera’s display. However, this single advantage does not outweigh the numerous benefits offered by the Fujifilm X-T3, making it the clear winner in this comparison.
|
Features
|
Fujifilm X-T3
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |  | | |
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |  | | |
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |  | | |
Screen Type | TFT LCD | LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |  | | |
Screen Size |  3" | 3" | |
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 1,040,000 dots | 1,230,000 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |  | | |
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |  | | |
Wi-Fi |  | | |
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |  | | |
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Sony a7 II Storage and Battery
The Fujifilm X-T3 outperforms the Sony a7 II in storage and battery, scoring 68/100 compared to the Sony’s 35/100. Both cameras accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards, but the Fujifilm X-T3 has an advantage with two memory card slots, while the Sony a7 II has only one. Both models accept USB charging, making it more convenient for on-the-go use.
The Fujifilm X-T3’s battery, the NP-W126S, provides 390 shots, giving it a longer battery life than the Sony a7 II’s NP-FW50, which offers 350 shots. However, the Sony a7 II has a slight edge in storage versatility, as it also accepts Memory Stick Duo, Pro Duo, and Pro-HG Duo cards.
Considering these factors, the Fujifilm X-T3 is the superior choice for storage and battery capabilities due to its dual memory card slots, USB charging, and longer battery life. The Sony a7 II offers additional memory card compatibility but falls short in other aspects.
|
Storage and Battery
|
Fujifilm X-T3
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | SD / SDHC / SDXC | SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro-HG Duo | |
|---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots |  | | |
Battery Type | NP-W126S | NP-FW50 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 390 shots | 350 shots | |
USB Charging |  | |
|
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Fujifilm X-T3
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
Overall Score DXOMARK overall sensor score. | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Portrait (Color Depth) As described by DXOMARK 'The Portrait score in our camera sensor reviews defines color depth performance and its unit is a number of bits. A color depth of 22 bits is excellent; differences below 1 bit are barely noticeable.' | N/A | 24.9 bits | |
Landscape (Dynamic Range) As described by DXOMARK 'The Landscape score in our camera sensor tests defines the maximum dynamic range of the camera sensor and its unit is an exposure value (EV). A value of 12 EV is excellent with differences below 0.5 EV usually not noticeable.' | N/A | 13.6 EVs | |
Sports (Low-Light ISO) Described by DXOMARK as 'The maximal value of ISO sensitivity needed to reach a given value of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The greater the value, the better' | N/A | 2449 |
|
Scores
|
Fujifilm X-T3
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
Main Features | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Extra Features | N/A | ||
Construction and Durability | N/A | ||
Handling and Ergonomics | N/A | ||
Value for Money | N/A | ||
Total Score | N/A |
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Sony a7 II – Our Verdict
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Fujifilm X-T3 or the Sony a7 II:
|
User Scores
|
Fujifilm X-T3
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
B&H photo video | N/A |
|---|