Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Fujifilm X-T5 — Which Is Better?

Fujifilm X-T30 II vs X-T5 Overview and Optics

The Fujifilm X-T5 emerges as the winner in the optics comparison with a score of 81/100, while the Fujifilm X-T30 II trails behind with a score of 67/100. Both cameras have a CMOS sensor, X-Processor, APS-C sensor size, and Fujifilm X lens mount. Neither camera has a DXOMARK score since Fujifilm cameras are not scored by DXOMARK.

The X-T5 outperforms the X-T30 II in several aspects. With a higher megapixel count of 40, the X-T5 captures more detailed images compared to the X-T30 II’s 26 megapixels. Additionally, the X-T5 is equipped with an X-Processor 5, a more advanced processor than the X-Processor 4 found in the X-T30 II. This results in faster and more efficient image processing. Furthermore, the X-T5 has image stabilization, which helps reduce camera shakes and results in sharper images, a feature lacking in the X-T30 II.

On the other hand, the X-T30 II has a faster shooting speed of 30, double that of the X-T5’s 15. This allows the X-T30 II to capture fast-moving subjects more effectively. However, this advantage is offset by the X-T5’s superior image quality and stabilization.

To sum up, the Fujifilm X-T5 has better optics than the Fujifilm X-T30 II, as evidenced by its higher score, higher megapixel count, more advanced processor, and image stabilization. The X-T30 II has a faster shooting speed, but the X-T5’s overall superior performance in optics makes it the better choice for photographers seeking high-quality images.

The Fujifilm X-T30 II comes out ahead in video capabilities with a score of 91/100, while the Fujifilm X-T5 trails slightly behind with a score of 87/100. Both cameras share some common video features, including a built-in time-lapse functionality that allows for creative and dynamic shooting experiences.

The X-T30 II takes the lead with its impressive 4K video resolution and the ability to record at a maximum video dimension of 4096 x 2160. Moreover, this camera boasts a high video frame rate of 120fps, which enables smooth slow-motion footage and detailed capture of fast-moving subjects. These features make the X-T30 II an excellent choice for users who prioritize video quality and versatility in their camera.

On the other hand, the X-T5 does have its strengths in video performance. It offers an even higher video resolution of 6K, with maximum video dimensions of 6240 x 4160. This increased resolution allows for more detailed and sharp footage. However, the X-T5 falls short in terms of video frame rate, offering only 60fps. This lower frame rate may limit the camera’s ability to capture fast action and produce smooth slow-motion video.

In comparing the video capabilities of the Fujifilm X-T30 II and the Fujifilm X-T5, it is evident that the X-T30 II is the superior choice for users who prioritize high frame rates and versatile video options. While the X-T5 does provide a higher video resolution, its lower frame rate makes it less suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects and slow-motion footage.

The Fujifilm X-T5 outperforms the Fujifilm X-T30 II in features, scoring 85/100 compared to the X-T30 II’s 70/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, touchscreen capability, flip screen, the absence of GPS, and the presence of WIFI and Bluetooth connectivity.

The X-T5 surpasses the X-T30 II in screen resolution, boasting 1,840,000 dots compared to the X-T30 II’s 1,040,000 dots. This higher screen resolution provides a clearer and more detailed display, enhancing the user’s experience when viewing images and navigating menus.

The X-T30 II does not have any advantages over the X-T5 in terms of features. Both cameras share the same core specifications, but the X-T5’s higher screen resolution sets it apart from the X-T30 II.

To conclude, the Fujifilm X-T5 is the superior camera in terms of features, thanks to its higher screen resolution. The Fujifilm X-T30 II, while sharing many of the same specifications, falls short in this aspect. Users who prioritize a clear and detailed display should opt for the X-T5, as it offers a better viewing experience for images and menu navigation.

The Fujifilm X-T5 outperforms the Fujifilm X-T30 II in storage and battery, scoring 76/100 compared to the latter’s 35/100. Both cameras accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards (UHS-I compatible) and offer USB charging. However, the X-T5 excels with two memory card slots, allowing for greater storage capacity and flexibility, while the X-T30 II only has one slot.

Additionally, the X-T5 boasts a longer battery life of 580 shots, using the NP-W235 battery type. In contrast, the X-T30 II’s NP-W126S battery lasts for 380 shots. This difference makes the X-T5 more suitable for extended shooting sessions.

Despite its lower score, the X-T30 II still offers adequate storage and battery performance for casual photographers or those who don’t require extended battery life. In this aspect, it may be a reasonable choice for some users.

To sum up, the Fujifilm X-T5 is the superior choice in terms of storage and battery, with its dual memory card slots and longer battery life. However, the X-T30 II remains a viable option for those with less demanding storage and battery needs.