Fujifilm X-T4 vs Sony a6600 Comparison

Fujifilm X-T4 vs Sony a6600 Overview and Optics

The Sony a6600 triumphs over the Fujifilm X-T4 in optics with a score of 76/100, a 3-point lead over the X-T4’s 73/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a CMOS sensor, APS-C sensor size, and image stabilisation. Additionally, each camera uses a unique lens mount, with the Fujifilm X-T4 featuring the Fujifilm X mount and the Sony a6600 using the Sony E mount.

The winning Sony a6600 stands out with its higher DXOMARK score of 82, indicating a superior sensor quality. Although the a6600 has a slightly lower megapixel count at 24.2 compared to the X-T4’s 26, it compensates with a faster processor, the Bionz X. This results in better overall image quality and processing capabilities.

On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-T4 excels in shooting speed, boasting an impressive 20 frames per second (fps) as opposed to the Sony a6600’s 11 fps. This allows the X-T4 to capture fast-moving subjects more effectively. However, the X-T4’s processor, the X-Processor 4, falls short compared to the a6600’s Bionz X processor.

In terms of optics, the Sony a6600 has the edge due. The Fujifilm X-T4, while lagging slightly in overall optics, offers a better shooting speed for action photography. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on the specific needs and preferences of the photographer.

The Fujifilm X-T4 and Sony a6600 both receive a video score of 91/100, indicating equal performance in this category. They share several video capabilities, including a maximum video resolution of 4K and built-in time-lapse functionality. However, there are some differences between the two cameras that set them apart in terms of video performance.

The Fujifilm X-T4 surpasses the Sony a6600 with its maximum video dimensions of 4096 x 2160, compared to the a6600’s 3840 x 2160. This difference allows the X-T4 to capture slightly higher resolution footage, providing more detail in the final product. Additionally, the X-T4 boasts a higher maximum video frame rate at 120fps, as opposed to the a6600’s 100fps. This advantage enables the X-T4 to record smoother slow-motion footage, offering more creative possibilities for videographers.

On the other hand, the Sony a6600 still holds its ground as a strong contender in video performance. Despite its lower maximum video dimensions and frame rate, the a6600 remains a reliable choice for those seeking quality 4K footage and time-lapse capabilities. Its video score of 91/100 confirms that it is a solid option for videography purposes.

Both the Fujifilm X-T4 and the Sony a6600 are exceptional cameras for video recording, with their shared 91/100 video score demonstrating their proficiency in this area. The X-T4 edges out the a6600 with slightly higher video dimensions and frame rate, offering more detail and creative options. Nevertheless, the Sony a6600 remains a dependable choice for those seeking excellent 4K video performance and time-lapse functionality.

The Fujifilm X-T4 emerges as the winner with a feature score of 85/100, while the Sony a6600 trails closely behind at 81/100. Both cameras share several common features, including a 3-inch screen size, touchscreen capability, flip screen, GPS, WiFi, and Bluetooth connectivity.

The Fujifilm X-T4 outperforms the Sony a6600 in terms of screen resolution, boasting 1,620,000 dots compared to the a6600’s 921,600 dots. This higher screen resolution allows for sharper and clearer image previews, assisting photographers in accurately assessing their shots. Furthermore, the X-T4’s higher feature score signifies that it has additional features that contribute to its overall performance and user experience.

On the other hand, the Sony a6600, despite having a lower feature score, still offers a competitive set of features that may appeal to some users. Its similarities to the X-T4 in terms of screen size, touchscreen capability, and connectivity options make it a viable option for those who may not require the higher screen resolution offered by the X-T4.

In comparing these two cameras, it is evident that the Fujifilm X-T4 holds an advantage with its superior screen resolution and overall feature score. However, the Sony a6600 remains a strong contender for those seeking a camera with similar specifications and connectivity options.

The Fujifilm X-T4 outperforms the Sony a6600 in storage and battery with a score of 73/100 compared to the a6600’s 48/100. Both cameras accept SD/SDHC/SDXC memory cards and offer USB charging. However, the X-T4 has two memory card slots, while the a6600 only has one, giving the X-T4 an advantage in storage capacity.

The Fujifilm X-T4’s battery life is 500 shots, using the NP-W235 battery type. In contrast, the Sony a6600 boasts a longer battery life of 810 shots with its NP-FZ100 battery. Despite the a6600’s superior battery life, the X-T4 still claims victory in overall storage and battery performance due to its dual memory card slots.

Considering these factors, the Fujifilm X-T4 is the better choice for those who prioritize storage capacity and versatility with its two memory card slots. However, the Sony a6600 remains a strong contender for those who value longer battery life for extended shooting sessions.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Fujifilm X-T4 or the Sony a6600:

• Sony a6400 vs a6600
• Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
• Fujifilm X-T4 vs X-T5
• Fujifilm X-T5 vs Sony a6600
• Sony a6600 vs a7C
• Fujifilm X-T3 vs X-T4