CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Fujifilm X-T5 vs Leica Q2 Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Fujifilm X-T5

fujifilm
Winner!
81%

Leica Q2

leica q2
76%
Fujifilm X-T5
vs
Leica Q2
Price
Brand
Fujifilm
Leica
Model
X-T5
Q2
Released
2022
2019
Announcement Date
February 11, 2022
March 07, 2019
Camera Type
Mirrorless
Compact
Camera Size
Camera Weight

The Fujifilm X-T5 outperforms the Leica Q2 with a score of 81/100 compared to 76/100. Both cameras share characteristics such as being released in the 2010s and having similar dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T5, a mirrorless camera, is lighter at 557g and more affordable with a launch price of $1699. On the other hand, the Leica Q2, a compact camera, is heavier at 734g and more expensive at $5000.

Despite its higher price, the Leica Q2 falls short in performance. The Fujifilm X-T5 proves to be a better choice due to its higher score, lighter weight, and more budget-friendly price. The Leica Q2, while having a lower score, may still appeal to some users for its compact design. Ultimately, the Fujifilm X-T5 stands out as the superior option between these two cameras.

Fujifilm X-T5 vs Leica Q2 Overview and Optics

The Fujifilm X-T5 wins in optics with a score of 81/100, while the Leica Q2 scores 79/100. Both cameras feature CMOS sensors and similar megapixel counts, with the X-T5 having 40 megapixels and the Q2 offering 47.3 megapixels. They also share common ground in their processors, with the X-T5 using the X-Processor 5 and the Q2 utilizing the Maestro II.

The Fujifilm X-T5 outperforms the Leica Q2 in several aspects. It has a faster shooting speed of 15 frames per second, compared to the Q2’s 10 frames per second. The X-T5 also has a larger sensor size, with an APS-C sensor, and offers image stabilization. Additionally, the X-T5 has a Fujifilm X lens mount, allowing for interchangeable lenses.

In contrast, the Leica Q2 has a higher megapixel count at 47.3 and a full-frame sensor, which contributes to better image quality. However, the Q2 has a fixed lens mount, meaning it cannot use interchangeable lenses. The Q2’s sensor has a DXOMARK score of 96, but the X-T5’s sensor does not have a score, as DXOMARK does not evaluate Fujifilm cameras.

To conclude, the Fujifilm X-T5’s superior shooting speed, image stabilization, and interchangeable lens capabilities make it a better choice in terms of optics. The Leica Q2 does have a higher megapixel count and a full-frame sensor, but its fixed lens mount limits its versatility.

Optics
Optics
81%
79%
Megapixels
40 MP
47.3 MP
Image Resolution
7728 x 5152 px
8368 x 5584 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
15.6 x 23.5 mm
24 x 36 mm
Sensor Format
APS-C
Full Frame
Frame Rate
15 fps
10 fps
Lens Mount
Fujifilm X
Fixed
Image Processor
X-Processor 5
Maestro II
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
125
50
Maximum ISO (Native)
12,800
50,000
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
64
50
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
51200
50000
Minimum Shutter Speed
15 s
120 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 8000 s
1/ 2000 s
Autofocus Points
425
225
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
Electronic
Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution
3,690,000 dots
3,686,000 dots

Fujifilm X-T5 vs Leica Q2 Video Performance

The Leica Q2 outperforms the Fujifilm X-T5 in video capabilities, scoring 91/100 compared to the X-T5’s score of 87/100. Both cameras share common features, such as time-lapse functionality built-in, making them suitable for capturing dynamic scenes over time.

The Leica Q2’s advantage lies in its higher maximum video frame rate of 120fps, which allows for smoother slow-motion footage and better action scene capture. This is double the Fujifilm X-T5’s maximum video frame rate of 60fps. Despite having a lower maximum video resolution of 4K (4096 x 2160), the Leica Q2 still delivers high-quality video output suitable for most professional applications.

On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-T5 boasts a higher maximum video resolution of 6K (6240 x 4160), providing more detailed and sharper footage. However, this advantage is somewhat diminished by its lower maximum video frame rate of 60fps. The X-T5’s higher resolution may be more appealing to those who prioritize image quality over smooth motion capture.

In comparing both cameras, the Leica Q2 excels in capturing smooth, high-quality video footage, particularly in fast-paced or action scenes, while the Fujifilm X-T5 offers a higher resolution for those who value image detail. Ultimately, the choice between these cameras depends on the user’s specific video requirements and preferences.

Video
Video
87%
91%
Video
Max Video Resolution
6K
4K
Max Video Dimensions
6240x4160 px
4096 x 2160 px
Max Video Frame Rate
60 p
120 p
Time-Lapse Built In
Video File Format
MOV
MPEG-4

Fujifilm X-T5 vs Leica Q2 Features and Benefits

The Fujifilm X-T5 wins in the features comparison with a score of 85/100, while the Leica Q2 scores slightly lower at 83/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, touchscreen capability, and the absence of GPS. Additionally, both cameras offer Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity.

The Fujifilm X-T5 outperforms the Leica Q2 in terms of screen resolution, boasting 1,840,000 dots compared to the Leica Q2’s 1,040,000 dots. This higher resolution provides a clearer and more detailed display for the X-T5. Furthermore, the X-T5 features a flip screen, allowing for more versatile shooting angles and better ease of use, especially for vloggers and selfie enthusiasts.

On the other hand, the Leica Q2, despite its slightly lower score, excels in its own ways. While it lacks a flip screen, it maintains a compact and minimalist design, which may be preferred by some users who value simplicity and ease of carrying. However, this advantage is subjective and depends on individual preferences.

In conclusion, the Fujifilm X-T5 takes the lead in the features department with its higher screen resolution and the presence of a flip screen. The Leica Q2 remains a strong contender with its simpler design, but it falls short in providing the same level of display quality and versatility as the X-T5. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on the user’s priorities and preferences.

Features
Features
85%
83%
Built-in Flash
External Flash
GPS
Weather Sealing
Screen Type
LCD
TFT LCD
Touch Screen
Screen Size
3"
3"
Screen Resolution
1,840,000 dots
1,040,000 dots
Flip Screen
Live View
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth

Fujifilm X-T5 vs Leica Q2 Storage and Battery

The Fujifilm X-T5 takes the lead in storage and battery with a score of 76/100, while the Leica Q2 trails behind at 21/100. Both cameras share compatibility with SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards. However, the X-T5 has an advantage with two memory card slots, compared to the Q2’s single slot, and supports UHS-I cards for faster data transfer.

In terms of battery life, the X-T5 outperforms the Q2 with 580 shots per charge, thanks to its NP-W235 battery. The Q2, using a BP-SCL4 battery, offers a lesser 350 shots per charge. Additionally, the X-T5 benefits from USB charging, a feature absent in the Q2.

Despite these differences, the Leica Q2 still delivers high-quality images and performance. However, its storage and battery capabilities fall short compared to the Fujifilm X-T5. Thus, for photographers prioritizing longer battery life and more storage options, the X-T5 is the clear choice.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
76%
21%
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible)
SD / SDHC / SDXC
Dual Memory Card Slots
Battery Type
NP-W235
BP-SCL4
Battery Life
580 shots
350 shots
USB Charging
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Overall Score
N/A
96%
Portrait (Color Depth)
N/A
26.4 bits
Landscape (Dynamic Range)
N/A
13.5 EVs
Sports (Low-Light ISO)
N/A
2491
Scores

Fujifilm X-T5 vs Leica Q2 – Our Verdict

Fujifilm X-T5 vs Leica Q2 Comparison image.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Fujifilm X-T5 or the Leica Q2:

User Scores
B&H photo video
Spotted a mistake with these camera specs? Please let us know so we can update it!