Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 240 Comparison
Fujifilm X100T
Leica M Typ 240
MirrorlessMirrorlessThe Leica M Typ 240 wins with a score of 57/100, compared to the Fujifilm X100T‘s 53/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and share similarities in size and weight. The Fujifilm X100T measures 127 x 74 x 52mm and weighs 440g, while the Leica M Typ 240 comes in at 139 x 80 x 42mm and 680g.
The Leica M Typ 240 has a higher score, indicating that it is a better camera overall. However, the Fujifilm X100T has its advantages, such as being lighter and more affordable, with a launch price of $1300 compared to the Leica’s $6950.
Although the Leica M Typ 240 is the winner, both cameras have their merits, and the choice depends on individual preferences and budget.
Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 240 Overview and Optics
The Leica M Typ 240 comes out ahead in the optics comparison, scoring 62/100, while the Fujifilm X100T scores 54/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as having a CMOS sensor, no image stabilization, and similar processors ��� EXR Processor II for the Fujifilm and Maestro for the Leica.
The Leica M Typ 240 outperforms the Fujifilm X100T in a few key areas. Firstly, it has a higher megapixel count of 24, compared to the Fujifilm’s 16. This allows for more detailed and higher-resolution images. Additionally, the Leica M Typ 240 has a full-frame sensor, which is larger than the APS-C sensor of the Fujifilm X100T. A larger sensor typically results in better image quality, especially in low light situations. The Leica M Typ 240 also has a DXOMARK sensor score of 84, while the Fujifilm X100T does not have a DXOMARK score. Lastly, the Leica M Typ 240 has a lens mount, allowing for interchangeable lenses, while the Fujifilm X100T has a fixed lens mount.
On the other hand, the Fujifilm X100T has a faster shooting speed of 6 frames per second, compared to the Leica M Typ 240’s 3 frames per second. This can be advantageous in capturing fast-moving subjects or action shots.
Taking these factors into account, the Leica M Typ 240 offers better image quality and versatility due to its higher megapixel count, larger sensor size, and interchangeable lens system. However, the Fujifilm X100T provides a faster shooting speed, which can be beneficial for some photographers. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user.
APS-C
Full Frame
3:23:2
Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 240 Video Performance
The Fujifilm X100T outperforms the Leica M Typ 240 in video capabilities, scoring 70/100 compared to the Leica’s 43/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as Full HD maximum video resolution and 1920×1080 maximum video dimensions. However, the Fujifilm X100T offers superior features that contribute to its higher score.
The Fujifilm X100T has an advantage in video frame rate, offering a maximum of 60fps, whereas the Leica M Typ 240 only reaches 30fps. This higher frame rate allows for smoother video playback and more flexibility during post-processing, such as creating slow-motion footage. Additionally, the Fujifilm X100T has built-in time-lapse functionality, which the Leica M Typ 240 lacks. This feature enables users to create unique time-lapse videos without the need for additional equipment or software.
Although the Leica M Typ 240 falls short in comparison to the Fujifilm X100T, it still maintains Full HD video resolution and 1920×1080 video dimensions, providing decent video quality for casual users. However, its lower video score reflects the limitations in frame rate and the absence of built-in time-lapse functionality.
Taking all factors into consideration, the Fujifilm X100T is the superior option for video capabilities, thanks to its higher frame rate and built-in time-lapse feature. While the Leica M Typ 240 still offers acceptable video quality, its limitations make it less versatile and less suitable for those prioritizing video performance.
Full HDFull HD
Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 240 Features and Benefits
The Fujifilm X100T outperforms the Leica M Typ 240 in terms of features, scoring 58 out of 100, while the Leica M Typ 240 scores 54. Both cameras share some common specifications. They both have a 3-inch screen size and lack a touchscreen and GPS.
The Fujifilm X100T has several advantages over the Leica M Typ 240. Its screen resolution is significantly higher, with 2,360,000 dots compared to the Leica’s 920,000 dots. This results in a sharper and clearer display for the Fujifilm X100T. Additionally, the X100T has a flip screen, offering more flexibility when composing shots. The presence of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity in the X100T further enhances its functionality, allowing for easy sharing and remote control of the camera.
The Leica M Typ 240, on the other hand, has limited advantages over the Fujifilm X100T. It does not have a flip screen, Wi-Fi, or Bluetooth connectivity. These missing features make the Leica M Typ 240 less versatile and user-friendly compared to the Fujifilm X100T.
In terms of features, the Fujifilm X100T is the clear winner. Its higher screen resolution, flip screen, and connectivity options provide a better user experience and more flexibility when capturing photos. On the contrary, the Leica M Typ 240 falls short in features, making it less competitive in comparison to the Fujifilm X100T.
3"3"
Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 240 Storage and Battery
The Leica M Typ 240 triumphs over the Fujifilm X100T in the storage and battery category with a score of 27/100, while the Fujifilm X100T scores 21/100. Both cameras share similarities in their storage capabilities, as they both have a single memory card slot and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards. However, the Leica M Typ 240 stands out in battery performance, offering a longer battery life of 500 shots compared to the Fujifilm X100T’s 330 shots, using the BP-SCL2 battery type.
Despite its lower score, the Fujifilm X100T still performs well with its Lithium-Ion NP-95 battery, though it falls short in comparison to the Leica M Typ 240’s endurance. Neither camera offers USB charging capabilities.
Considering these factors, the Leica M Typ 240 proves to be superior in terms of storage and battery life, providing users with a longer-lasting experience. The Fujifilm X100T remains a decent option, but those seeking extended battery life may find the Leica M Typ 240 more suitable.
Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 240 – Our Verdict
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Fujifilm X100T or the Leica M Typ 240: